Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

VASIN AI | Нейросети | CRM

@vasin_ai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

272subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001637834649
TypeChannel
Username@vasin_ai
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vasin_ai

Growth

2728 Aug 2026, 15:31 — 272 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:31 — 272 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:319 Aug 2026, 15:31
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 271–273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 15:31272no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:31272first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.2%
avg views ÷ 272 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held15 (26 July 202525 July 2026)
Views total175
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2531.3%
2126.3%
👍1012.5%
😁911.3%
🤣78.75%
❤‍🔥45.00%
🤔22.50%
😨11.25%
🥰11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я несколько обескуражен Он мне перечит?! Мне же не кажется это? 🤨 Как думаете, напишет в итоге то, что мне нужно или нет? 🤔

🤣2😁2

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

24 Jul 2026, 20:15 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🆕 Claude Opus 5: почти флагман, но вдвое дешевле Anthropic выпустила Claude Opus 5. Смысл релиза не в том, что это самая умная модель компании — самой умной остаётся Fable 5. Смысл в экономике: Opus 5 подбирается к её уровню, а стоит вдвое меньше. Цена та же, что у предшественника Opus 4.8 — $5 за миллион входных токенов и $25 за миллион выходных. В подписке Claude Max она стала моделью по умолчанию, в Pro — самой

👍1

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

9 Jun 2026, 20:39 UTC192 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как уснуть то теперь Он что вообще делает Я как будто снова в 2024 году, когда впервые с ChatGPT подружился 🤯 Те же эмоции, только перспективы осознаются уже сильно иначе 🥹

🔥2

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

9 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC182 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Anthropic затеяли революцию в вечно революционном мире AI Уже тестирую возможность вновь выпущенной ими модели и вам советую Окно возможности пока что приоткрыто до 22 июня

🔥1

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

18 Sept 2025, 05:33 UTC771 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня выступаю с темой про ИИ в прекрасном Новосибирске. Впервые в этом городе — красивом и чистом. Да, я успел увидеть только дорогу от аэропорта до отеля и центр города, пока прогуливался от отеля до центра “Мой Бизнес”, НО! Этого мне хватило, чтобы сформировать первое впечатление о городе. Я смотрел по сторонам вместо экрана смартфона — и многое увидел! А ещё в Новосибирске очень проактивные предприниматели. П

🔥12❤‍🔥4🥰1

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

15 Aug 2025, 20:22 UTC647 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Создано в ChatGPT 5 😉

5👍3🤔1

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

14 Aug 2025, 14:04 UTC592 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Open AI таки это сделали Вернули возможность пользоваться всеми любимой моделью 4o. Пока не сделают всего того, что обещали в пятой - рекомендую вам пользоваться проверенной 4o 😉

7

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

13 Aug 2025, 11:25 UTC467 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Все о том же)))

2👍1

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

9 Aug 2025, 11:22 UTC476 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GPT-5 продержалась всего сутки Запуск новой модели закончился скандалом. GPT-5, которую обещали как «самую мощную нейросеть в истории», разочаровала пользователей: она путается в простых вопросах, отвечает сухо и без эмоций. Reddit за сутки превратился в сплошную стену жалоб. Люди пишут, что «машина стала холодным роботом», и шутят, что теперь она отлично подойдёт для написания инструкций по микроволновкам. Ситуац

🔥3

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

8 Aug 2025, 05:53 UTC425 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😏

🤣5😨1

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

7 Aug 2025, 06:43 UTC439 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Как снимать кругляши в Telegram с размытым фоном (в режиме киноэффекта) и как пересылать кругляши без подписи «переслал» - делюсь подробной инструкцией 😉

🔥6

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

3 Aug 2025, 04:23 UTC381 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Microsoft опубликовали список из 40 профессий, которые скоро исчезнут из-за нейросетей. Какие профессии пропадут: Переводчики Редакторы Агенты по рекламе Финансовые консультанты Бортпроводники Графические дизайнеры Кассиры Монтажеры Веб-разработчики Есть и сомнительные предположения, например, что репортёры и журналисты, и даже «политологи» исчезнут. Это вряд ли. Человеческий подход в вопросах человеческих конфлик

🤔1

Signed Александр Васин ИИнтегратор AI и CRM для бизнеса. Нейросети, Битрикс24

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @vasin_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 992,781 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VASIN AI | Нейросети | CRM” (@vasin_ai), 272 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vasin_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.