Channel
@varm_jewerly
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003273692808 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @varm_jewerly |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/varm_jewerly |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 21 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 19 | +12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 7 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 6 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 3 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 3 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
17 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 52.9% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 23.5% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Амарин. Мастерская 47. Материалы: Подвеска - металлический сплав Бусины - пластик, хрусталь, морозный агат, стекло. Размер изделия 42см + 5см удлинительная цепь. Стоимость изделия 1300 рублей. На момент публикации в наличии 3 ожерелья. (В скором времени поставка материалов недостающих для большего количества) #фандом #лофд
❤3👻1🔥1
Немного пропала (за что мне стыдно), но наложилось: 1) волнение при поступлении 2) радость после поступления 3) забытая оплата за впн 4) выявленная ненадежность/уязвимость в креплении декоративных элементов Но сейчас все прекрасно, так что возвращаюсь в рабочий режим. Stay tuned 💜 #щп
Какой вариант лучше?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Уже несколько дней думаю над тем, какой вариант Амарина выглядит лучше.. Наверное мне самой больше нравится 1 с золотыми элементами, но среди знакомых реакция была менее однозначная, а значит стоит попробовать пособирать мнение так скажем "шарящих" людей, чтобы оценка не была в отрыве от персонажа.
❤1👻1🔥1
Джодах Ави. Игра Бога (ну, и не только;)). Материалы: Подвески - нержавеющая сталь Бусины - стекло, смола. Размер изделия 39см + 5см удлинительная цепь. Стоимость изделия 1300 рублей На момент публикации в наличии 5 ожерелий. #фандом #лофд Традиционно автор арта с (в этот раз ленивой) эстетики: @pankeck брала арт с пинтерест
❤1👻1🔥1
Люциус. Игра бога. По материалам: Подвеска из нержавеющей стали, бусины из вулканической лавы, стекла и пластика. Размер изделия 30см + 5,5см удлинительная цепь Стоимость изделия 1300 рублей. На момент публикации поста в наличии 3 ожерелья. #фандом #лофд //автор арта с четвёртого изображения: https://t.me/SenekkaArtspace
❤3👎1👻1
Возможно, в ближайшее время я переделаю оформление канала, ведь стартово не сильно заморачиваюсь на его счёт, иначе стану затягивать тем, чтобы наконец начать (это я более чем умею), так что, лучше перейдём к первому изделию:
Навигация: #кастом #фандом #майнкрафт #лофд #мш #музыка #заказ #щп Оформить заказ можно здесь: @barrrmint (Пишите, я не кусаюсь, сама немножко социофоб) Цена написана без учета стоимости доставки. По Петербургу возможна доставка путем личной встречи и будет рассчитываться по примерной цене проезда на транспорте. В остальные города России доставка через СДЭК, Озон, Вайлдберриз или Почту России. (Пост будет обновляться…
В этом посте прикрепила небольшое портфолио из работ, которыми в большей мере довольна и по сей день. (В комментариях прикреплю больше работ, но не могу ручаться за качество изображений там в связи с разницей во времени съёмки) Большинства украшений уже нет в наличии, но при наличии спроса могу повторить изделие на заказ.
❤1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @varm_jewerly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой вариант лучше?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Barm Jew” (@varm_jewerly), 21 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/varm_jewerly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.