Channel
@variance_olly
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
122subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003398152471 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @variance_olly |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/variance_olly |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 122 | +1 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 121 | +2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 119 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 117 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 117 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 118 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 120 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 122 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We’re putting £500 aside every month to reward our IB network. This isn’t simply about bringing in the most clients. We’ll be looking at overall growth, consistency, retention and contribution to VARIANCE. One IB will be selected by management each month. Want to become a VARIANCE IB? Message us - @variance_support
Photo, posted without a caption
For the past few weeks, all of my focus has been on building our community. Making sure our current clients are getting the best possible experience, whilst helping our IBs become the best they can be. I’m opening 3 spaces within VARIANCE. Client or Affiliate. If you’re serious about getting involved, message me directly @oc_var 3 spaces. First come, first served.
MONTHLY REPORT - AUGUST Slow month, but we made it work. 206RR | 2,190 POINTS | 47% WIN RATE Our goal has always been quality over quantity. Some groups take 22 trades in a day. We’d rather take 22 in a month and wait for the setups that actually matter. More trades ≠ better trades. Patience pays.
Photo, posted without a caption
The best part.. Full explanation sent / step by step of the entry Our goal isn’t to flood your phone with notifications & trades, when you have no idea about the reasoning behind them We want every member to eventually be able to trade for themselves If less noise, better RR and real trading is what your after message me @oc_var , let’s talk
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Monday and Tuesday completed Solid start to the week, 77RR in just 2 trades
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
1 month of VARIANCE. We’ve officially been live for a full month now. 248.5RR across just 29 trades That’s an average of 8.5RR per trade With a 60% win rate 29 trades. 248.5RR. The goal was never to flood the feed with trades. It was to wait for the right setups and execute them properly. Month 1 done.
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @variance_olly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Olly | Inner Circle” (@variance_olly), 122 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/variance_olly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.