Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๛ وارستگی ๛

Channel

๛ وارستگی ๛

@varastegi_ir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

871subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001709987952
TypeChannel
Username@varastegi_ir
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/varastegi_ir

Growth

8278718496 August 2026 — 827 subscribers6 August 2026 — 827 subscribers7 August 2026 — 829 subscribers15 August 2026 — 871 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 820–878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:52871+42
7 Aug 2026, 10:25829+2
6 Aug 2026, 15:17827no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:35827first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.2%
avg views ÷ 871 subscribers
Avg views / post
141
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (7 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,409
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2781.8%
👌412.1%
🔥13.03%
😢13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‌ ‌ هر که ترسد ز ملال اندُهِ عشقش نه حلال سَرِ ما و قدمش یا لبِ ما و دهنش @varastegi_ir #پیاله

🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC84 viewsread 6 August 2026

‌ ‌ ادامه پست قبل... 🔸هایدگر در آثاری چون تفسیر سرودهای هولدرلین، به بازگشت ادیسئوس اشاره می‌کند و آن را نه یک فتح تکنولوژیک، بلکه فرایند «دیدار با غربت برای آموختن زبان خویشتن» می‌داند. ادیسئوس تنها زمانی می‌تواند به سمت ایتاکا حرکت کند که از ارادهٔ معطوف به تسلط دست بردارد، محدودیت خود را بپذیرد و اجازه دهد «هستی» خود را بر او آشکار کند. 🔹 گذر از میان سیلا و کاریبدیس در فیلم نولان، تمثیلی از همین مواجهه با نیستی و

5 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC74 viewsread 6 August 2026

‌ ‌ 💠 بی خانمانی و درد غربت انسان ▪️ خوانشی هستی‌شناختی از فیلم «ادیسه» نولان ✍🏻 سیدعلی روح‌الامین 🔸سینمای کریستوفر نولان همواره برای من عرصه‌ای برای دست‌کاری «زمان» و آزمودن مرزهای وجودی انسان در مواجهه با ورطه‌ها بوده است. از پی‌جویی در لایه‌های ذهن در فیلم «تلقین» تا سرگردانی در سیاهچاله‌های زمان در «میان‌ستاره‌ای». امروز به تماشای جدیدترین اثرش، «ادیسه»، نشستم. 🔹 این فیلم فراتر از یک اقتباس حماسی شکوهمند یا نمای

5 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC74 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‌ ‌ 💠 بی خانمانی و درد غربت انسان ▪️ خوانشی هستی‌شناختی از فیلم «ادیسه» نولان ✍🏻 سیدعلی روح‌الامین 🔻متن کامل یادداشت در لینک زیر: 🔎 https://varastegi.ir/4435 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

1 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC135 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @akefbookPhoto

#تازه_های_نشر ۱۴۰۵ 📗 کتاب رساله شلینگ در باب ذات آزادی انسانی ✍🏻 نویسنده: مارتین هایدگر ▪️ ترجمه: الهام کریمی ▪️ مقدمه: دکتر صافیان 🔰 خرید با 20 درصد تخفیف در چهار قسط:👇🏻 https://www.iranketab.ir/c/beebc6 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 🔻 @akefbook

31 Jul 2026, 00:21 UTC161 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‌ ‌ 💠 برای عرضه به غرب چه داریم؟ با کدام شیوه؟ 👥 گفتگوی آقایان عبدالجواد فلاطوری، رضا داوری اردکانی، حداد عادل، مجتهد شبستری و... 🔰 مطالعه متن کامل گفتگو: https://varastegi.ir/4428 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

28 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC208 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ادامه پست قبل... به‌تدریج این احتمال برایم جدی‌تر شده است که شاید این تفاوت صرفاً یک تفاوتِ فرهنگی یا ادبی نباشد، بلکه از دو تلقیِ کاملاً متفاوت نسبت به خودِ هستی سرچشمه بگیرد. در سنتِ متافیزیکیِ غرب، موجود باید روشن، معین، تعریف‌شده و حاضر در برابرِ ذهن در مقامِ ابژه باشد؛ از همین‌رو زبان نیز پیوسته در کارِ تثبیت و تعین‌بخشیدن به آن است. اما در ذن، هستی بیش از آن‌که موضوعِ تملکِ مفهومی باشد، افقی است که انسان باید

2

28 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC155 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‌ ‌ بعد از تأمل در تفاوتِ میانِ سنتِ ذن و تفکرِ غربی، بیش از هر چیز یک تفاوتِ ظاهراً ساده اما بسیار بنیادین توجهم را به خودش جلب کرده است؛ عطشِ سیری‌ناپذیرِ فهمِ غربی برای سخن‌گفتن، تشریح‌کردن و روشن‌ساختنِ همه‌چیز. کافی است نگاهی به کتاب‌های قطورِ فلسفه از افلاطون و ارسطو گرفته تا هگل و هوسرل و حتی خودِ هایدگر بیندازیم. گویی حقیقت، چیزی است که هرچه بیشتر درباره‌اش سخن گفته شود، هرچه بیشتر طول و تفصیل یابد و هرچه دقی

1

25 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC221 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‌ ‌ موجِ دریا در کنارم، از تک‌وپویم مپرس آنچه من گم کرده‌ام نایافتن گم کرده‌ام #پیاله #بیدل_‌دهلوی @varastegi_ir

👌2

22 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC253 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

کمی خوردم ز انگور نجف، زیر زبانم ماند به مرگم نیز آن طعم ملس بیرون نمی‌آید نائب‌الزیاره همه دوستان هستم...

15

16 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC334 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‌ ‌ 🔸 فلسفه از بدو پیدایی خود در یونان، با «سفر» گره خورده است. نخستین فلاسفه و حتی شاعران، آثار خود را «هیستوریا» می‌نامیدند که بهترین ترجمه‌اش واژه‌ی آلمانی «ارفوندونگ» به معنای انکشاف است. کتاب «در باب طبیعت» پارمنیدس روایت سفر اوست. کتاب هفتم «جمهوری» افلاطون، حکایت سفر از غار جهل است. سهروردی «غربت غربیه» را نوشت. پدیدارشناسی روح هگل را شارحان، یک «اودیسه» می‌خوانند. 🔹 اما این صدرا بود که برای نخستین بار در تار

3

15 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC274 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

‌ ‌ ✍🏻 انتشار متن کامل یادداشت «در افق شهادت» نوشته حجت‌الاسلام دکتر سیدعلی روح‌الامین در دومین شماره گاهنامه «چراغ صبح» با موضوع «میدان؛ واکاوی نظری تجمعات شبانه مردمی». #گاهنامه #اندیشه #چراغ_صبح کانال بله چراغ صبح: https://ble.ir/cheragh_sobh پیج اینستاگرام چراغ صبح: https://instagram.com/cheragh_sobh 🔸 دفتر مطالعات راهبردی حوزه هنری اصفهان

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @varastegi_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 130,820 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“๛ وارستگی ๛” (@varastegi_ir), 871 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/varastegi_ir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.