Channel
@vaqtesheh_ir
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,085subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002563292988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vaqtesheh_ir |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vaqtesheh_ir |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @vaqtesheh_ir/72 · this entry3 Dec 2025, 14:07 UTC | @iskamedia/26689 Dec 2025, 21:01 UTC | 1.00 | 6 days |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @iskamedia | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 48 minutes | this entry (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 December 2025 to 12 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @vaqtesheh_ir — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 1,085 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 1,090 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 1,091 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:50 | 1,091 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
168 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 97 | 57.7% | |
| ❤ | 69 | 41.1% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مرکز ازدواجی "وقتشه" pinned «❗️ درود به همراهان عزیزمون چه چیزایی که به ما نگذشت ... مدتیه به دلیل تلخکامیها و شرایط اینترنت؛ فعالیت ما کمرنگ تر شده ولی ناامید نمیشیم و تعطیل هم نمیشیم تو این مدت یک دوره آموزشی سوادرابطه تولید کردیم منتهی با توجه به محدودیت دسترسی به اینستاگرام…»
❗️ درود به همراهان عزیزمون چه چیزایی که به ما نگذشت ... مدتیه به دلیل تلخکامیها و شرایط اینترنت؛ فعالیت ما کمرنگ تر شده ولی ناامید نمیشیم و تعطیل هم نمیشیم تو این مدت یک دوره آموزشی سوادرابطه تولید کردیم منتهی با توجه به محدودیت دسترسی به اینستاگرام و تلگرام؛ تو پیامرسان "بله" کانال زدیم و ازتون انتظار حمایت داریم تا بتونیم دوباره فعالیت هامون رو شروع کنیم. خیلی از مخاطبامون به صفحات ما دسترسی ندارن.. سا…
❤2
#سوال_جواب 🟡 سوال: سلام من سعیدم از ابهر زنجان ۲۹ سالمه به دختری علاقه دارم که تو خانواده ی پرجمعیت بزرگ شده. چارتا تا داداش داره سه تا تا خواهر من تک فرزندم و توی تنهایی و خلوت خودم بزرگ شدم. میترسم وارد رابطه بشم و به خاطر این تفاوت خانواده هامون اختلاف مون زیاد بشه. بنظرتون این تفاوت خانوادگی میتونه ازدواج مون رو به چالش بکشه؟ 🟢 جواب مشاور وقتشه: تو تک فرزند بودی یعنی یاد گرفتی وقتت رو با خودت باشی، تصمیمهات …
❤1👍1
#سوال_جواب 🟡 سوال: من مهدی ام از تبریز ۲۸ سالمه یه دختر رو میخوام که خانواده ش از نظر مالی از ما خیلی بالاترن دختر چشم و دل سیر و قانعیه و منو دوست داره.. مطلبی گذاشتین که باید دختر و پسر کفویت مالی داشته باشن.. وقتی خود دختر راضیه با من اوکی بشه چه مشکلی داره؟ 🟢 جواب مشاور وقتشه: کفویت مالی که صرفا بهمعنی برابر بودن پول حساب بانکی نیست؛ ملاک همسطح بودن اندازه جیب دو نفر، سطح توقعات، سبک زندگی و تعریف هر کدوم …
👍20❤6
📍آزمون انگیزه و تاب آوری میزان توانایی ات رو در مقابله با چالش ها و حفظ انگیزه میسنجه! لینک آزمون رایگان: https://share.google/XkJ9T4buck8faPzV2 -------------------------- | مرکز ازدواجی وقتشه - @vaqtesheh_ir | --------------------------
❤4👍3👎1
پیام یکی از شما: با طلای ۱۴میلیونی و سکه ۱۴۰تومنی فکر نکنم کسی دیگه قصد ازدواج داشته باشه 🟢 جواب ما به این دوستمون اینه که مشکل ازدواج، طلای ۱۴ میلیونی نیست؛ مشکل فرهنگ بسیار غلط ما ایرانیهاست.. ایران تنها فرهنگیه که طلا رو از «هدیه عاطفی» به «ضمانت حقوقی» تبدیل کرده.. شاید عدهای از دخترخانم ها به این صحبت ما گارد داشته باشن ولی متوجه نیستن که اولین قربانی این فرهنگ غلط، خود خانم ها هستن! تو خیلی از کشورها از…
👍25❤2👎1
#سوال_جواب 🟡 سوال: من راضيه ام از اهواز ۲۰ سالمه پسری که دوسش دارم تو یه شهر دیگه کار می کنه بهم گفته بعد از ازدواج باید بریم شهری که اونجا کار میکنه.. خانواده ام میگن دوری از شهر و خانواده سخته منم دوستش دارم و دلم پیششه ولی دو دلم که باهاش برم یا جواب منفی بدم 🟢 پاسخ مشاور وقتشه: برای جواب به این سوال باید چنتا موضوع رو بررسی کرد. اول تیپ و شخصیت خودت دوم شرایط محل سکونت جدیدت سوم کیفیت ارتباط و حمایت همسرت چه…
👍7❤2
❗️ ما تو ایتا کانال زدیم و مطالب رو به طور خودکار اونجا هم پست میشن.. اگه مشکل دسترسی به تلگرام دارید میتونید ایتا مونو دنبال کنید: https://eitaa.com/vaqtesheh_ir
#سوال_جواب 🟡 سوال: اینکه تو پیامهای قبلی نوشتید پسر باید بگرده و دختر مد نظرش رو پیدا کنه! ماهایی که دانشگاهمون رو تموم کردیم و این فرصت از دستمون پریده و الان هم مشغول کاریم دقیقا از کجاها باید دنبال دختر مناسبمون باشیم؟ 🟢 پاسخ مشاور وقتشه: وقتی میگیم «پسر باید شکارچی باشه و همسرش رو بگرده شکار کنه»، منظور پرسهزدن تو محیطهای ناسالم نیست؛ منظور اینه که ازدواج یک انتخابه و خودت باید دست بکار بشی نه اینکه منتظر…
👍12❤2
📍آزمون شخصیت کاتل یکی از معتبرترین ابزارهای روانشناسی برای شناخت عميق شخصیت افراد هست. این آزمون ۱۶ عامل اصلی شخصیت رو بررسی میکنه! لینک آزمون رایگان: https://vaqtesheh.ir/آزمون-کاتل/ -------------------------- | مرکز ازدواجی وقتشه - @vaqtesheh_ir | --------------------------
❤5👍4
روز مادر مبارک همه مادرامون ❤️❤️ -------------------------- | مرکز ازدواجی وقتشه - @vaqtesheh_ir | --------------------------
❤9
#سوال_جواب 🟡 سوال: من مهتابام از تهران، ۲۴ سالمه. خواستگارم خیلی شوخطبعه. منم اوایل جذب این روحیه شدم، ولی میترسم بعدها جدی بودن لازم رو نداشته باشه. شوخطبعی زیاد میتونه مشکلساز باشه؟ 🟢 پاسخ مشاور وقتشه: شوخطبعی ذاتاً خوبه و نشونهی معاشرتی بودنه، ولی یه نکتهی ریز داره… اگه تعادل در شوخطبعی نباشه، دردسرساز میشه. یعنی شوخطبع بودن مشکلی نیست؛ شوخی توی موقعیت نامناسب مشکلزا میشه. پیشنهاد میکنم بدون ای…
❤12👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vaqtesheh_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 396,063 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مرکز ازدواجی "وقتشه"” (@vaqtesheh_ir), 1,085 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaqtesheh_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.