Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Эйфория мыслей

@vanncreator

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

44subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001563449178
TypeChannel
Username@vanncreator
DescriptionКанал, где я открыто пишу обо всём, что только придёт мне в голову.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vanncreator

Growth

449 Aug 2026, 15:46 — 44 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 16:01 — 44 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:4610 Aug 2026, 16:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43–45 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:0144no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:4644first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.9%
avg views ÷ 44 subscribers
Avg views / post
32.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held13 (28 January 20262 August 2026)
Views total65
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
531
Videos
105
Links
52

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6057.7%
💋1514.4%
💘1211.5%
🔥87.69%
🥰43.85%
💯32.88%
👀21.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC31 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @eva_sun_bossteam

https://youtube.com/shorts/OcydXrgaa0o?si=HOGVfZAxpnsokcOA

3

21 May 2026, 18:30 UTC104 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Интересно, если бы я собирала подтанец на недавний женский камбек группы - кто-нибудь пошёл бы? У меня пятая точка горит походу перед рестом ахах

💯3👀2💋1

16 Apr 2026, 12:04 UTC197 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Считаю, мы смогли поймать этот street sexy style, поэтому ещё немного подгона медиа контента сегодня ✨ И спасибо Наташе за скорость и комфорт в рабочем процессе: по сути, полтора суток прошло от идеи до готовых фото ❤️

12💋1🔥1

15 Apr 2026, 20:01 UTC197 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Ну что ж... С днем рождения меня ✨

💘126💋5

7 Apr 2026, 07:31 UTC124 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

- Сколько вы хотите эффектов? - Да. Очень дорогостоящий клип и, как по мне, очень сочный таки получился, хоть совершенно не знаю, что за артист, но впечатление явно оставил https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4pj4Wwl41E

5💋1

1 Apr 2026, 05:41 UTC113 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вчера был очень неожиданный и до безумия вкусный подарочек от Роми - я аж прослезилась от такой красоты ❤️

7💋2

21 Mar 2026, 06:31 UTC132 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ставим ставки господа, успею ли я на ласточку, чтобы на мк попасть или нет :)

5

15 Mar 2026, 13:51 UTC154 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Случаем, может кто-то знает, как сейчас настроить мою волну? Раньше столько кайфовых инди групп подкидывал по моим жанрам, столько песен кайфовых новых, а сейчас сплошные старые песни... я их тоже люблю, но как бы и новых артистов и треки хочу поддерживать и открывать, а тут такая фигня :(

3💋1

9 Feb 2026, 11:36 UTC215 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Позовите меня на эйтиз адреналин - меня с него разрывает 😱

7💋1

5 Feb 2026, 21:53 UTC223 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

1 фото - как бы я хотела рисовать 2 фото - как я рисую на самом деле На самом деле очень хочется когда-нибудь так рисовать, но пока очень медленно просто калякую и пробую. Эдакая медитация получается 🙂 автор первой картины: miruMW

6💋1

5 Feb 2026, 10:46 UTC172 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://youtu.be/TQqbmDF4DIM?si=IUz7Ln-hUi7LqJKj Очень захотелось поделиться мыслями после этого видео. Потому что я такая же заложница предрассудков по поводу своего веса - когда я худая - меня любят, а когда толстая - я плохая Максимально всегда, когда со стороны слышу подобные фразы, оспариваю их и говорю о том, что вес вообще ничего не значит в плане характера, любви и т.п., но прекрасно понимаю такое виденье и

🔥53💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @vanncreator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 162,501 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эйфория мыслей” (@vanncreator), 44 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanncreator.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.