Me and cats failed project is stranded join @blehsaint atp
😭2

Channel
@vanitynew
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003993300615 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vanitynew |
| Created | 27 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vanitynew |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 88 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 88 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (27 May 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 58 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
114 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 43 | 37.7% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 24.6% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.26% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Me and cats failed project is stranded join @blehsaint atp
😭2
i want to announce our close friends cat aka @catstock67 my partners death even though he was a fed but still kind hearted guy i want everyone to say rip may his soul rest in peace much love cat we all loved you and your ragebaits and everything and the death was supposedly a car crash after he was coming home from fedding 🕊🕊🕊 (last seen online 3 days ago)
🕊7😭6
@YHCHATS — RICHNESS LIST S Tier Lunacy • Jacob A Tier Rifle B Tier B1 C Tier Curse • Xah D Tier Yato • crave E Tier Soufian • Yoru • capo • eg F Tier Cat • Silja • zone G Tier Sel • Alp • ex H Tier Xon • Saint I Tier Adam • Bud • Flow • hansut @vanitynew
👎6❤5😭5
vanity news ⚠️JUST IN: cat being caught. today the user cat aka @catstock67 saint(@ihatesaint) partner has been caught being a fed and trying to fed a few couple of members in vanity com like saint(@ihatesaint),sel(@seljux),zone(@feds33) and more members rumor is circulating in @yhchats that cat is trying to get people to fall for him by being and paying low 2 fig or even 1 fig and then stabbing them in the back a…
🔥6
guys kindly do NOT buy anything vanity before dming @ihatesaint or @catstock67 cuz u WILL get jewed the u will lose money
😭4🔥3
vanity news ⚠️JUST IN: yoru running away after trying to make beef. Yoru alleged that B1 had been making fun of and speaking negatively about Rifle inside a private group chat supposedly created by Saint. B1 denied the accusation, stating that he is not in any such group chat and has never spoken negatively about Rifle. Saint also confirmed that B1 is not a member of any group chat related to the claims. Following…
🔥6🌭4🤣1😭1
vanity news ⚠️JUST IN: Grace /su beef Adam is reportedly accusing multiple people of trying to sell the upcoming Grace vanity, which is expected to drop in around 10 hours. He allegedly demanded a 50% cut from whoever successfully claims it. Meanwhile, b1 responded saying he’s not coming into this with an ego and is simply trying to test his new setup/partner on the claim. @vanitynew
🔥5😭4
proof shows sel is innocent but adam is trying to make a quick 30 bucks from sel
👍6🤨4
Right now Adam is accusing the well-known guy Sel of selling his graces to Silja, while also demanding cuts from /glaze after Sel sniped it. Adam claims he was the one who gave the graces for both situations, but the proofs literally show otherwise and that he never did. Sel says Adam is just being paranoid and acting like a dork over $20–30 vanities.
😭8
@feds3 known ai developer has been seen saying stuff after getting banned for scamming on oguser and telegram saying he misses “cp” 😉
😭13👀7
Soon 🔜
🔥8🌚1👎1💩1
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @vanitynew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,263,569 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vanity news” (@vanitynew), 88 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanitynew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.