Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vanessa OpenSource

@vanessa_opensource

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

565subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001231685558
TypeChannel
Username@vanessa_opensource
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vanessa_opensource

Growth

5658 Aug 2026, 13:31 — 565 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:51 — 565 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:319 Aug 2026, 00:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 564–566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:51565no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:31565first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6839.8%
😁3218.7%
👍2816.4%
2212.9%
👏74.09%
🍾52.92%
🤣31.75%
🎉21.17%
😱21.17%
😭10.585%
🤔10.585%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2024 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Feb 2026, 15:37 UTC≈4,400 viewsread 8 August 2026

на самом деле, конечно, запись ЖР вне транзакции. и записи в ЖР фиксируются даже для отмененных транзакций.

19 Feb 2026, 15:24 UTC≈4,370 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

увидел очень интересное про запись в ЖР автор считает, что запись в ЖР транзакционная я всегда считал, что знаю, что запись в ЖР вне транзакции. что скажете? люблю такое находить 😁

3🔥3🤔1

19 Feb 2026, 07:35 UTC≈4,050 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

коллега специально добавил вот такой промпт для ИИ-ревьювера один из результатов такого разбора я и показал выше #ии

4🔥4😭1😱1

19 Feb 2026, 07:31 UTC≈3,200 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

из свежего общения коллеги с ИИ-ревьювером 😁 от меня отдельное спасибо ИИ за ностальгию по 1С 7.7 #ии

😁16

30 Aug 2025, 14:27 UTC≈5,350 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

творчество на тему конференции через Perplexity

🔥7👍21

20 Aug 2025, 11:27 UTC≈5,100 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Общение с ИИ-ревьювером кода 😂 Коллега доказывает CodeRabbit, что замечание учтено и ошибки точно нет.

😁16🔥3🤣3

12 Aug 2025, 11:55 UTC≈4,080 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Интересный новый инструмент для разработчиков скриптов 1script https://github.com/Stivo182/depos

🔥32

29 Jul 2025, 10:32 UTC≈3,690 viewsread 8 August 2026

В ванесса-раннер список расширений можно получить так vrunner designer —additional "/DumpDBCfgList -AllExtensions" благодарим пакетный режим конфигуратора /DumpDBCfgList [-Extension <имя расширения>] [-AllExtensions] — вывод расширений конфигурации. Если ни один параметр не задан, будет выдана ошибка. Доступные параметры: Extension <Имя расширения> — выводит имя конфигурации-расширения. Если расширение не существуе

27 Mar 2025, 16:25 UTC≈3,260 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Свежайший Gemini знает про инструмент Vanessa-ADD 🥳

👍12🍾5

5 Mar 2025, 12:27 UTC≈3,150 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️Всем привет! Ищу активного мейнтейнера для развития и поддержки проекта Vanessa-ADD - фреймворк тестирования для 1С. в связи с рождением сына, да, я теперь молодой папа, времени на поддержку проекта не хватает 😰 сыну уже несколько месяцев, но легче со временем не стало 😇 Предоставлю полные права к проекту и репозиторию на гитхабе. Помогу максимально. Я сам проект бросать не планирую, хочу его и дальше развивать,

🔥13👏5👍4

24 Jan 2025, 15:53 UTC≈2,610 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

а теперь представлю результаты работы ИИ-бота мой промпт очень прост - Заполни комментарии к коду процедуры на языке 1С далее я вставил текст самого метода из общего модуля и бот очень быстро создал замечательное описание // Функция возвращает значения реквизитов объекта в виде структуры // // Параметры: // Ссылка - Строка/Ссылка - Идентификатор объекта: // * Строка - полное имя

🔥111

24 Jan 2025, 15:51 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 8 August 2026

⚡️Хочу показать отличный инструмент для анализа кода 1С - меня впечатлило, как качественно бот создаёт комментарии к коду 🥳 Активно юзаю ИИ-бота https://chat.deepseek.com - он очень хорош, хотя ревью кода пока весьма слабовато 😇 Приведу пример Практически все разработчики знают метод из БСП - ОбщегоНазначения.ЗначенияРеквизитовОбъекта приведу его "родное" описание // Возвращает структуру, содержащую значения рекви

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vanessa_opensource. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 877,561 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vanessa OpenSource” (@vanessa_opensource), 565 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanessa_opensource.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.