Channel
@vandad_group1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002337761938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vandad_group1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vandad_group1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:13 | 52 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 51 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 52 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 51 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 51 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 46.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 یک اشتباه رایج در معاملات ملکی! قبل از امضای قرارداد، فقط به حرفهای طرف مقابل یا حتی بنگاه اکتفا نکنید. مشخصات ملک، مشخصات طرفین، مبلغ معامله، نحوه پرداخت، زمان تحویل، شرایط فسخ و تعهدات هر دو طرف باید با دقت بررسی و در قرارداد درج شود. ❌ جملههایی مثل «بعداً درستش میکنیم» یا «نگران نباش، بهت اعتماد دارم» ممکن است در زمان اختلاف هیچ کمکی به شما نکند. ✅ قرارداد خوب، قراردادی است که حتی در صورت اختلاف هم تکلیف …
اسکرین شات … 📞 @vandad_group1
👩🏻⚖️ بفرست برای کسی که آرزوی این لحظه رو داره 🥰✨ @vandad_group1
❤1
⚖️ آیا پیامک میتواند دلیل و مدرک در دادگاه باشد؟ بله، اما نه هر پیامکی. پیامکها و مکاتبات الکترونیکی ممکن است در کنار سایر دلایل، بهعنوان اماره یا دلیل مورد توجه دادگاه قرار گیرند. با این حال، قاضی با بررسی شرایط پرونده، اصالت پیامها و سایر مدارک درباره ارزش اثباتی آنها تصمیم میگیرد. 🔹 بنابراین، صرف وجود یک پیامک به معنای اثبات قطعی ادعا نیست و معمولاً باید با سایر ادله همراه باشد. #دانستنی @vandad_group1
قانون برای حمایت از ضعیف ها وجود داره نه برای قوی تر کردن قدرتمند ها 👩🏻⚖️👨🏻⚖️ روزتون بخیر ✨ @vandad_group1
👏1
💡 آیا عکس گرفتن از چک یا سفته، جای اصل آن را میگیرد؟ خیر. عکس یا تصویر چک و سفته، جایگزین اصل سند تجاری نیست و برای بسیاری از اقدامات حقوقی و بانکی، ارائه اصل سند ضروری است. ✅ اگر اصل چک یا سفته را تحویل میدهید، حتماً از آن تصویر تهیه کنید و رسید دریافت نمایید تا در صورت نیاز، سابقهای از آن در اختیار داشته باشید. @vandad_group1
خب بریم سراغ جوابش
به نظرتون عکس از سفته جای اصل سفته رو میگیره؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سلام روزتون بخیر ✨
📞 02128428216 راه ارتباطی مستقیم با گروه ونداد 🥰
👍2
⚖️ نکته حقوقی امروز آیا امضای سفید، بهتنهایی دلیل بر اعتبار هر نوشتهای است؟ خیر. اگر شخصی برگهای را سفیدامضا در اختیار دیگری قرار دهد، دارنده آن حق ندارد هر متنی را برخلاف توافق طرفین در آن درج کند. در صورت سوءاستفاده از سفیدامضا، علاوه بر امکان طرح دعوای حقوقی، در شرایطی ممکن است مسئولیت کیفری نیز برای سوءاستفادهکننده ایجاد شود. 📚 آگاهی از حقوق، نخستین گام برای پیشگیری از بسیاری از اختلافات است. @vandad_gro…
❤2
سلام روزتون بخیر ✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vandad_group1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظرتون عکس از سفته جای اصل سفته رو میگیره؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اگه پدرتون قبل از فوت همه اموالش رو به نام یکی از فرزندان بزنه، فکر میکنید بقیه حق اعتراض دارن یا نه؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گروه ونداد” (@vandad_group1), 52 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vandad_group1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.