Channel
@vamperskie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
327subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003790363005 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vamperskie |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 10 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vamperskie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 327 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 328 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 328 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
8 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424592391187231707 | 3 | 37.5% | |
| custom 5397639628863865768 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5424878320045027144 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5424835112674029912 | 1 | 12.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ищете место, где каждый профиль проходит через внимательный взгляд, а правдивые слова действительно имеют вес? Добро пожаловать в наш канал проверки СП — пространство, где помогают увидеть сильные стороны профиля, подчеркнуть индивидуальность и получить честную оценку. Мы также ищем администрацию! Если вы: Ответственный человек. Умеете общаться с людьми. Готовы помогать участникам и поддерживать активность. При…
Signed Clêōpätrą
Мы открыли чат для общения без нормы Заходим все https://t.me/+1FNt7P8P0GUzMzhi
Signed Maleficent
Активные переходим сюда @maleficentovskie
Хочу сообщить, что мы @vampireskie , переезжаем в новый канал: @maleficentovskie Также прошу прощения, если отправила данный пост когда канал спит/в ресте и тд. Кто хочет сохранить наш союз пишите сюда: @J5E7N
К тому же я всегда говорил, что не нужно обижаться на моё мнение во время оценок. Это лично моё мнение, а у вас своя голова на плечах.
custom 54245923911872317071
Signed Müstâng.
откуда у вас такие выводы? джен отлично справляется с ролью владельца, сама она очень понимающий и приятный человек. админы всегда пытаются для вас выложится на все сто. обидно, когда после наших усилий мы получаем это. если ваше мнение сложилось после интерактива с оценкой личных аккаунтов, поясню, у каждого свои критерии и вкус. мы не можем подстраиваться под всех. воспринимайте критику нормально, не всем может пон…
Signed Déflect
чет дохуя распизделись. в личо скажи.
custom 54245923911872317071
Signed Az'سارابي
Вас приветствует владелец канала "Vampireskie" хочу обратиться к вам с очень большой просьбой. Если вы учавствуете в интерактивах/играх, то прошу давать самоотдачу и взаимодействовать в ответ. Ведь админы тоже тратят на это определенное количество времени и тоже устают от этого. Очень не приятно видеть то, что 700+ подписчиков на канале, а актива ноль. Если вы присоеденились к какому то интерактиву и просто сидите жд…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Она 10/10, но она не умеет извиняться.
Ой, у кого-то чувства задели? Бедняга. Тон сбавь. Мы здесь контент пилим, а не работаем в службе психологической помощи. Если ты считаешь, что нам нужно "исправляться" ради твоего комфорта — у нас для тебя плохие новости. Можешь поплакать в комментариях под другим постом, если полегчает.
Signed Müstâng.
Джен кажется очень грубой и не общительной. С ее стороны много грубости к подписчикам это не круто👎🏻 Исправляйтесь админы Вообще все админы хуевые у вас отношения к подписчикам хуевое и атмосфера вообщем на канале👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻
custom 53976396288638657682custom 54248783200450271442custom 54245923911872317071custom 54248351126740299121
Signed Müstâng.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vamperskie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Поиграем в она 10/10,но?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 7 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,227,780 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vamperskie named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕЕЗД Vampireskie” (@vamperskie), 327 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vamperskie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.