фотографии валентина ощущаются как что-то волшебное. как первый взгляд на самое стоящее кино. я в экстазе.
custom 544536072272688899575❤34💋17❤🔥9💘5🥰1

Channel
@valtisem
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,204subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001626261867 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @valtisem |
| Created | 12 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/valtisem |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 1,204 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 1,205 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 1,207 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 1,207 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,597 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 624 | 39.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 290 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5318882689003041610 | 195 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5445360722726888995 | 159 | 9.96% | |
| 💘 | 129 | 8.08% | |
| 💋 | 104 | 6.51% | |
| 💅 | 55 | 3.44% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 2.38% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.125% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.063% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,597reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 9 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
фотографии валентина ощущаются как что-то волшебное. как первый взгляд на самое стоящее кино. я в экстазе.
custom 544536072272688899575❤34💋17❤🔥9💘5🥰1
всевышний спустился с небес, чтоб подарить нам такого потрясающего фотографа, как валентин блох. они – искусство. самая настоящая драгоценность. it's their aura. 🤍🌟
💅55custom 544536072272688899522❤13💋8❤🔥4💘3custom 53188826890030416101
время устроить вечеринку #мойтт
❤62❤🔥14🥰3💋2custom 53188826890030416101
кто вдруг забыл, то у него лапки 🐾
custom 531888268900304161073custom 544536072272688899530💘17❤11💋3❤🔥2
посмотрела ТТ. начало чудесное. картинка, визуал, сами парни – всё так красиво и приятно. то-ли от скучания по любимому шоу, то-ли от энергии парней, но посмотреть дальше ещё несколько серий залпом захотелось прям сразу. обрадовало, что вернули изначальную соревновательную составляющую в игру. всё же тот вкус, азарт и вытекающие из этого всего приколы – именно то, за что я так сильно полюбила этот проект. за антона…
💘61❤30💋13❤🔥8🥰1
антон шастун самый ахуенный мужик во вселенной и это принимается без каких-либо доказательств. это аксиома.
❤69❤🔥22💋19🥰9💘1
LORD HAVE MERCY. он богоподобен.
❤71❤🔥31💋10🥰1
немного красивых ракурсов 🖤
❤🔥51❤22custom 544536072272688899517💘3💋1🥰1
этот бессовестно ахуенный мужчина в образе блейда – самое настоящее преступление.
❤51❤🔥27💘8custom 53188826890030416105💋2🥰1
я чувствую чувства 🖤
❤🔥45❤19custom 531888268900304161010💘3💋1🥰1
антон в своей абсолютной слэй реперской эре делает со мной просто невообразимые вещи. он сияет. cr. [1, 2, 3]
❤55❤🔥27custom 531888268900304161012💘5🙏2🍓1💋1🥰1
доброе утро, друзья. кайфующий и красивый антон шастун со всех вечериночных ракурсов это определённо то что мне было нужно чтоб снова почувствовать себя прекрасно.
custom 531888268900304161045🥰19❤9❤🔥7💘4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @valtisem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 305,846 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@valtisem named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“валти 👾” (@valtisem), 1,204 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valtisem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.