Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вальти

@valti_arts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

347subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001556308988
TypeChannel
Username@valti_arts
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/valti_arts

Growth

347348347.59 Aug 2026, 15:17 — 348 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:30 — 348 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:31 — 347 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:1710 Aug 2026, 09:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 347–348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:31347-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:30348no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:17348first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 347 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.0
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held12 (26 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total420
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3035.3%
❤‍🔥2124.7%
🔥1214.1%
custom 521992134251357316267.06%
custom 535525519936980020655.88%
👏33.53%
🤪33.53%
💋22.35%
💘22.35%
🤗11.18%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC17 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Набросала вчера своих персонажей в анфас и 3/4 и поймала себя на мысли, что лица у них получаются каждый раз немного разными, хотя и остаются узнаваемыми

5❤‍🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Если в ближайшее время анонсирую свой комикс, будете читать?

  1. Да, с удовольствием!78%
  2. Посмотрю, если заинтересует0%
  3. Я здесь в основном ради артов0%
  4. Моя кнопка22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤗1

6 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC24 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

✨ | ☀️ Ехехехе, вот и результат! + вариант в традишке #анимация

5custom 52199213425135731623💘1custom 53552551993698002061

4 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC28 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В очередной раз тестировала новые скачанные кисти в клип студио, поэтому для пробы только правую часть нарисовала. Под песню из постов выше взяла Дина и Блу 💕 Ещё маленький спойлер к будущей анимации: этот арт нарисую в скетчбуке, а вот как он будет вставлен — увидите! 🤫

4🤪3💘1custom 53552551993698002061

2 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC30 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

И ещё недавние скетчи, с головами вчера набросала. 😃 В тик токе есть тренд под песню «my moon my man», а я на странице нарисовала Дина (слева) как «солнце», а Джея (справа) как «луну». Подумала немного и поняла, что по контексту не подходит, вместо Дина Сонет лучше подходит. А то выглядит так, что оба в отношениях, хотя они братья. 💀 Такое не одобряю, поэтому это просто останется в скетчбуке

5

2 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC25 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Скетчи, которые накопились за июль. Кто-то помнит наверняка, что был тренд с Барби и Кеном среди художников, когда фильм только-только вышел. Так вот, единственный законченный вариант среди моих персонажей — это с Сонет и Джейсоном в 2023 году 😨

🔥4👏32custom 53552551993698002062

31 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC34 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 итоги! Вместо работ покажу вам фотку, на которой стою рядом с заведующим кафедрой «Графические информационные технологии». 🤭 А теперь перечислю, что произошло в этом месяце: 🔷 со второй попытки закончила первый курс; 🔥 нарисовала классного персонажа для своего проекта на учебную практику; 🔷сделала анимацию под одну из своих любимых песен (Collar full); 🔷 закончила спустя 2 года скетчбук. Хочу

🔥63custom 52199213425135731623

30 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC35 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

До конца артфайта осталось мало времени, поэтому это будет завершающая пятая атака. А то сил нет особо. 😅 Насчёт отдельного поста — думаю, что не буду составлять, поскольку вы все арты по этой теме видели. Опишу свои впечатления: 1. 5 атак для первого раза это вполне неплохой результат! 2. Мне показалось, что такой формат «челленджа» мне не совсем подходит, а буду ли участвовать в следующем году — неизвестно. 3. В ц

3💋2❤‍🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Какая-то крутая женщина рисуется

❤‍🔥5custom 53552551993698002061

26 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC46 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

В тик ток выложила новое видео про свой проект Вот отрывок, ещё не удержалась с моментом «Всё!» из Ералаша и вставила в концовку. Так что можете идти смотреть

❤‍🔥5

26 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC43 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мне в ответ на артфайт нарисовала @kayori42!! Блу такая красотка здесь 🥰

❤‍🔥7🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @valti_arts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

Если в ближайшее время анонсирую свой комикс, будете читать?

  1. Да, с удовольствием!78%
  2. Посмотрю, если заинтересует0%
  3. Я здесь в основном ради артов0%
  4. Моя кнопка22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,128,621 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вальти” (@valti_arts), 347 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valti_arts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.