https://x.com/apolitical3678/status/2084996990031573152 - 711 jKr: Juutalaiset avaavat Toledon portit, mikä johtaa satojen vuosien muslimihallintoon Espanjassa. - 1492 jKr.: Isabella ja Ferdinand valloittavat takaisin Espanjan viimeisen jäljellä olleen muslimialueen. 1492 jKr.: Juutalaisten karkottaminen 1492 jKr.: Espanjan ”kulta-ajan” alku 1968 jKr.: Espanjan juutalaisten karkottamismääräyksen virallinen kumoa…

Channel
Valo Paljastaa ☀️
@valopaljastaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,154subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001398120965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @valopaljastaa |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/valopaljastaa |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 1,154 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 1,153 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,152 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 1,152 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.9%
- avg views ÷ 1,154 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 183
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.53%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,477 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 51s
- Average length
- 1m 19s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 33 | 68.8% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
'Spain pressured over Gaza stance' 'They are trying to force Spain into active participation' ~ Harrison Smith, host of The War Room WATCH FULL
DRIVE-BY SHOOTING INTERVIEW: The punishment beating of Spain by allies of the US and Israel Trump gave $40m to the Kingdom of Morocco weeks before the invasion of Ceuta. You don't need to be Einstein to work out that when he said Spain would pay a price for its stance against Israel, this was it. Spanish lawyer and analyst Rubén Gisbert explains Follow @moatstv 575 #RubenGisbert #Ceuta #Morocco #Trump
31.7.2026 Espanjaan on saapunut yli 100 000 siirtolaista viimeisten 12 tunnin aikana. Kaikki Maghrebin maat ovat järjestäneet koordinoidun operaation, joka on kestänyt jo useita päiviä. Vankilat on tyhjennetty ja niissä olleet rikolliset on lähetetty tänne käymään jihadia tulevina viikkoina ja kuukausina. Espanjan hallitus on pidätettävä, asetettava syytteeseen ja tuomittava ankarimpiin rangaistuksiin. Armeija sai…
6.8.2026 Miksi lähdimme (Rebel News) Espanjaan: valtamediasta et saa totuutta Ceutan valtauksesta Yli 60 000 muslimimaahanmuuttajaa tunkeutui 30. heinäkuuta Ceutaan Espanjassa ja ylikuormitti viranomaiset. David Menziesin RAPORTTI: https://rebelne.ws/4wN3oSa
🇨🇳🇮🇱 Kiinan tiedustelupalvelu paljastaa Mossadin johtaman Ceutan maahanmuuttajien kosto-operaation Humanitaarinen hätätila jatkuu Espanjan Ceutan alueella, jossa vapaaehtoisjärjestöt ovat rekisteröineet noin 4 860 maahanmuuttajalasta – mikä on kaksinkertainen määrä virallisiin arvioihin verrattuna, kertoo El Mundo. Lehti viittaa yhä useampaan kiinalaiseen tiedusteluanalyytikkoon, jotka yhtyvät uskottaviin teorioihin…
Virparda, Intia Morbin talukan Virpardan kylässä sijaitsevan viljelijän kaivon epätavallinen veden liike on saanut piirihallinnon määräämään teknisen tutkimuksen. Kaivo, joka sijaitsee viljelijä Pranjivanbhai Saradian pellolla, rakennettiin noin kolme kuukautta ennen monsuunia. Tämän kauden runsaan sateen seurauksena se täyttyi vedellä. Sunnuntaista lähtien vesi on kuitenkin toistuvasti muuttunut sameaksi ja liikk…
Big oil (Millä eri keinoilla energian hinta on saatu nostettua korkealle tasolle?)🤔
Andrew Korybkon geopoliittinen näkemys https://mvlehti.net/2026/07/31/analyysi-selvennys-venajan-politiikan-faktoista-maga-liikkeen-kannattajille-andrew-korybko/
*Anti 👃
👍1😁1
Christopher Jon Bjerknis - The Kalergi Plan | Practical Idealism In Action The "immigrant invasion" of the west, and the race mixing that will ensue is absolutely deliberate and essential for the fulfillment of the jewish 'Kalergi Plan' to genocide all white people of European descent, as outlined in the 1925 book: 'Practical Idealism" by Richard Coudenhove Kalergi. Practical idealism by Richard von Coudenhove-…
Siitä seuraavaa virushuijaus matoa koukkuun "maailman onnellisimmalle" kansalle Kovat ruttorajoitukset iskivät itärajalle... https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=27835040892783520&set=pcb.27835042269450049
💩5🤬3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @valopaljastaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@valopaljastaa named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Valo Paljastaa ☀️” (@valopaljastaa), 1,154 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valopaljastaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.