Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Valks — русско-эрзянский словарь

@valks_dictionary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004488001229
TypeChannel
Username@valks_dictionary
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 13 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/valks_dictionary

Growth

6874716 August 2026 — 68 subscribers10 August 2026 — 68 subscribers13 August 2026 — 74 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:2774+6
10 Aug 2026, 00:4568no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:1668first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
112.3%
avg views ÷ 74 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.1
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,330
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6956.6%
👍2823.0%
🔥64.92%
👏43.28%
💔32.46%
😱32.46%
🥰32.46%
❤‍🔥21.64%
💯21.64%
🤔21.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC21 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

О чём вам хочется читать больше? (можно несколько)

  1. Новости: что происходит с языком сейчас33%
  2. Уроки, разборы слов и грамматики25%
  3. Поэзия, сказки, литература42%
  4. История и культура эрзян67%
  5. Люди: интервью и портреты25%
  6. Цифровое: клавиатуры, переводчики, ИИ33%
  7. Наука: исследования и словари33%
  8. Финно-угорский мир: опыт родственных народов58%

The shares total 316%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3👍2

9 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC30 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Единственная в мире сцена, где эрзянский звучит профессионально, начиналась в 1932 году с полуподвала на 35 мест. Сегодня национальному театру в Саранске — девяносто: больше сорока спектаклей, труппа из тридцати пяти артистов. Но «театр может пережить своего зрителя — не может пережить собственную труппу»: без набора молодых актёров-носителей сцена рискует стать национальной по костюмам и русской по языку. Как театр

💔3👍1

8 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC36 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

📊 Словарь живёт: месяц в цифрах 👥 За июль — около 2000 читателей и 3400 просмотров, график ползёт вверх. Заходят не только из России: работают и английская, и немецкая версии сайта. 🔎 Словарём реально пользуются, а не просто открывают главную: ~1050 поисков и ~1090 открытых карточек за полтора месяца. И девять запросов из десяти находят ответ. 🔊 Произношение тоже слушают — уже 132 прослушивания. Чаще всего включаю

7👏2

8 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC43 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Бабушка знает эрзянский. Внук — нет. Между ними — не лень и не «нежелание», а десятилетия чужих решений: язык вывели из школы, конторы и эфира, а ответственность за его судьбу оставили кухонному столу. «Языковой сдвиг не происходит сам собой — его организуют». Где на самом деле решается судьба эрзянского языка и почему семья не справится в одиночку — в нашем материале.

3💯2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC41 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔊 Занимательная статистика озвучки Живой голос носителя стоит рядом с карточкой: открываешь слово, жмёшь ▶ — и слышишь, как оно звучит по-настоящему. Подвели итоги первого этапа работы. 📊 Главные числа • 1434 слова уже с озвучкой • 1442 записи (у восьми слов — сразу два голоса, мужской и женский) • ≈ 33 минуты чистой эрзянской речи, если слушать подряд • полторы недели назад было ~335 слов — то есть за это время оз

3🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC53 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Есть ли у эрзянского языка современная музыка и что мешает ей стать явлением — в нашем материале. 🔎 Valks 🤝 Помочь словарю

6👍1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC90 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔊 Словарь заговорил громче За неделю в VALKS стало втрое больше живого звука: произношения от носителей теперь есть у 1134 слова (неделю назад — около 335). Открываете карточку — и слышите, как слово звучит на самом деле. Записывают носители эрзянского, и голосов в команде прибавилось. 📝 На карточках — больше примеров употребления: живые фразы из эрзянских текстов, выверенные носителями. Спасибо каждому, кто помог

7❤‍🔥2👍2

30 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC97 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Как передать ребёнку язык, которого нет ни в школе, ни на улице? Две семьи, у которых получилось. 🔎 Valks 🤝 Помочь словарю

4👍2

24 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC132 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Мы запустили самоучитель эрзянского языка «Šumbra či!» — «Добрый день!». С этой фразы начинается наш бесплатный курс с нуля: 24 урока, которые доводят до уровня A1–A2. Что внутри: 🔊 Диалоги озвучены носителями — вы слышите живую эрзянскую речь, а не читаете транскрипцию с листа 📖 Каждое слово в уроке кликабельно и ведёт прямо в словарь (26 000+ статей) ✍️ Латиница — главная, рядом кириллическая подсказка и русс

9🔥5👍2🥰2👏1

24 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC100 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔊 Словарь заговорил в два голоса На valks.erzja.info уже 281 слово можно не только прочитать, но и услышать. К мужскому голосу добавился женский — произношение начитывают носители эрзянского. Нажмите ▶ рядом со словом и послушайте, как оно звучит на самом деле. 🔎 Valks 🤝 Помочь словарю

4👍1

23 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В 1897 году Самарская губерния была первой в империи по числу назвавших родным «мордовское наречие» — 238 598 человек. В переписи 2021 года национальность «эрзя» здесь указали 428. Куда исчезли эрзянская газета, радио и школьные классы Заволжья — в нашем материале. 🔎 Valks 🤝 Помочь словарю

👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @valks_dictionary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

О чём вам хочется читать больше? (можно несколько)

  1. Новости: что происходит с языком сейчас33%
  2. Уроки, разборы слов и грамматики25%
  3. Поэзия, сказки, литература42%
  4. История и культура эрзян67%
  5. Люди: интервью и портреты25%
  6. Цифровое: клавиатуры, переводчики, ИИ33%
  7. Наука: исследования и словари33%
  8. Финно-угорский мир: опыт родственных народов58%

The shares total 316%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

На каком языке с вами говорили дома, когда вы были ребёнком?

  1. В основном на эрзянском13%
  2. На эрзянском и русском примерно поровну4%
  3. По-русски, но эрзянский звучал у бабушек и дедушек25%
  4. Только по-русски, хотя семья эрзянская29%
  5. Только по-русски — эрзянских корней в семье нет21%
  6. На другом языке8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

Что строить дальше?

  1. Больше примеров употребления36%
  2. Озвучка слов (голос носителя)36%
  3. Самоучитель / уроки32%
  4. Мобильное приложение41%
  5. Толкования на самом эрзянском36%
  6. Больше слов / редкая лексика59%

The shares total 240%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 190,404 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Valks — русско-эрзянский словарь” (@valks_dictionary), 74 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valks_dictionary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.