Channel
@valer_33_kis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
314subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002029513548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @valer_33_kis |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/valer_33_kis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 314 | -29 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 343 | -17 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 360 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 361 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:09 | 361 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
209 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 39.2% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 23.4% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 16.3% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 8.61% | |
| 💋 | 10 | 4.78% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 3.35% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 2.87% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.478% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.478% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.478% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖤Если вы возвращались к человеку после расставания, чем это закончилось?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Не знаю, ты мне веришь или нет Я жестко упивался и снова начал курить и пить Ты опять в моем халате, на моем балконе *Кризис доверия приводит к саморазрушению. Но цикл отношений не разрывается.
❤5
🤩
❤21🥰8🔥1
Что для вас тяжелее всего выдержать в отношениях?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6👍2
Молча погашу свет Твоя чистая душа светит в темноте Украду в ночи Я в тебе тону, будто в омуте Значение* строки — про сильную эмоциональную зависимость, где человек видит в другом свой единственный свет, хочет полностью обладать им и постепенно тонет в своих чувствах.
❤8
♥️
❤12😍7🐳6🔥1
💔Если взаимности нет, но чувства есть — что вы обычно делаете?
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍4
Я оставлю себе на заметку Что жить надеждой — это та же пропасть И я не добьюсь своей сказочной цели Ведь ты не будешь писать сказку со мною Полюби меня, люби до дна Значение* Осознание, что «сказочного» общего будущего не будет, сочетается с тихой надеждой и потребностью в любви и душевной близости, которая не исчезает даже после понимания реальности.
❤3🔥2
💛
🔥20👍12🥰10❤2
❤️Нормально ли меняться ради человека?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍7
Я бы точно знал, куда себя деть Ходил за тобой бы прямо как тень Я бы вдохнул тебя полной грудью И держал в мехах, что прочнее железных прутьев Значение* Строки передают сильную привязанность, растворение в человеке и желание полного эмоционального слияния.
🔥5👍3
🤩🤩
❤21🔥15💋10👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @valer_33_kis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🖤Если вы возвращались к человеку после расставания, чем это закончилось?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что для вас тяжелее всего выдержать в отношениях?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💔Если взаимности нет, но чувства есть — что вы обычно делаете?
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤️Нормально ли меняться ради человека?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤️Есть ли у событий скрытый смысл, даже если мы его не видим?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 8 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вселенная33” (@valer_33_kis), 314 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valer_33_kis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.