Channel
@valentinodebunk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001962386470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @valentinodebunk |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/valentinodebunk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 108 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 110 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 111 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 111 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 7 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 17 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2024 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
NEW VALENTINO DETRACE DEBUNKED 😂 All mails using @gmail.com domains are random mails attached in random DBs, “2023-2024 rat logs” in which have no correlation to valentino as none of it links to any of his accounts, the mails provided are linked to an entire different person and was used as a placeholder (Doxbin does not require email verification) <- DB it came from Linkedin “val xo” doesn’t exist, nor do the burn…
😭5
THIS IS NOT VALENTINO’S FACE These are all the UGLY ASS “faces” that retards claim are valentino, none of them are & no one has sent proof any of these are either No valentino is not Indian, no he was never clipped by qr, no he never got cucked by qr, that girl larps dating valentino due to her obsession over him NOTE: He is FACELESS, none of these UGLY fake leaks are him unironically Also valentino's name is not…
😭12
VALENTINO "ESEX CLIP" / "YES IMMEDIATELTY" DEBUNKED valentino & the egirl Euna were obviously aware of the trolling "clipping" scenarios as it’s in the chat in the clips, obviously valentino saying "yes immediately" was a troll Though the poor people will still cry & claim its "real" to cope 😂
VALENTINO "BEGGING" FOR AME DEBUNKED PT 2. You can clearly see valentino & ame admitting to those screenshots being fake No idea why broke kids (preferably cringe packers) use those fake screenshots to cope
VALENTINO "BEGGING" FOR AME DEBUNKED Obviously fake, valentino does not type like this For context, ame inspect element valentino & her's real DM's as a joke Ame also dated his boy not him, just obviously AI generated inspected DM's
VALENTINO "VOICE CHANGER" DEBUNKED (3-4 YEAR OLD PUBLIC RECS) x2 fake intel of blacked out videos do not say "valentino" nor does it sound like him (troll set + allegedly a packer "kranky") 2 other bottom Discord clips are public and 2-3 years old, posted by valentino, posted in this channel & similarly sounds like him in 2026 Unironically there are multiple clips of him speaking, not to mention majority of it is …
VALENTINO "BEGGING" EGIRL "KORT" TO STAY IN VC DEBUNKED valentino was trolling this egirl asking her to stay in VC which she did for 6+ hours, not really "intel" but light debunk Thumbnail of the fake clip: https://ibb.co/F40hGTcp
VALENTINO ESEXING QR/LAESY DEBUNKED Fake esex clip, random old british guy moaning claiming to be valentino (valentino sounds nothing like him) Also not only that but there is not a single sign of valentino’s profile in this shitty fake leak
INSTAGRAM MIMIC USERNAME - NICKNAME FAKE MESSAGE METHOD Example on how these poor retards spend their time making fake valentino "leaks" Editing their instagram name (not username) to valentino's old IG username to make fake intel on him Com is dead and niggas are still crying about valentino and making fake shit of him daily 😂
FAKE VALENTINO "FACE LEAK" ON INSTAGRAM DEBUNKED Example on how its fake is below, no this is NOT valentino's face
VALENTINO SAYING "I LOVE U" DEBUNKED valentino does not use Instagram, nor has that ever been his username(s), any screenshots in context to using IG is not valentino considering he doesn't own that app nor do any of the screenshotted messages say his name
PROOF THE EGIRL VALENTINO SAID " I love u" TO WAS A SOCIAL EXPERIMENT Everything was planned moments before valentino sent that message, still not better than what he has on her though
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @valentinodebunk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 848,564 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“valentino debunked” (@valentinodebunk), 108 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valentinodebunk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.