Main Portal Join: https://t.me/hallofbooks

Channel
Rah/Raelyn Lorebook
@rahlorebook
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
232subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003415731271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rahlorebook |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 24 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rahlorebook |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 232 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 233 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 234 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 234 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 24 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 49s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
66 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 43 | 65.2% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 22.7% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 12.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2025 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Should we drop everything on @raelyn today?
- Yes95%
- No9%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2
🚨JUST IN: Rah / @raelyn has been seen on her new PC setup she got for Christmas this year after her devices were taken when valentino ran her off late November 😂 Although it comes with a twist, it appears she is still obsessed with valentino calling him rich & addressing herself as poor! DISCLAIMER: Rah / @raelyn / Jacina is still wildly obsessed with valentino while knowing he obviously doesn't want her nor feeds …
😭7👍2
🚨JUST IN: Rah / @raelyn / Jacina has been seen begging for valentino to do explicit things in VC while following him around in Discord server(s) As you can see there is a strong obsession she has with valentino where she has to continuously stalk him, follow him around in servers, spam him on Telegram, Discord, etc. NOTE: It appears she will never get over the fact that valentino does not want her but she still ran…
😭8❤1
🚨JUST IN: Rah @raelyn has been caught trying to fuck on valentino after he cucked her & ran her off 😂 Moments after rah / @raelyn was rejected she blocked him out of anger & frustration NOTE: This is her 1000th time trying to DM valentino & bag him but failed every single time while she continues to have an obsession with him while having a boyfriend Holy airball! 😂😅
😭5
#1 Fan of king valentino flexed giving him 100k robux
😭11
🚨JUST IN: A very RECENT clip surfaces of Rah / @raelyn admitting to valentino that he made her in terms of exposing her for being a nonetheless little cuck 😂 P.S. Despite her being ran off by him moments before this on multiple accounts she still seems to find her way bay back to her father valentino NOTE: Intel says (won't say the source), @raelyn cucked some broke random & claims to have cucked him multiple times…
😭5
🚨JUST IN: After Rah / @raelyn being ran off by valentino & completely made by him she has gotten some fame not only on Telegram but in TikTok comment sections 😂 It appears she has became TikTok comment famous in Stranger Things S5 related videos LOL NOTE: Despite her claiming to be inactive she lurks on Telegram daily due to her addiction, ignore Rah / @raelyn making claims of "leaving com" or "going inactive" 😂
😭5
The same broke niggas venting about valentino & Justin are the same niggas copying their lingo, usernames/display names, channels, pfps, troll style, etc 😂
😭2
🚨JUST IN: It appears valentino has completely ran off rah / @raelyn we're sorry for the late news as she unlinked her channel ownership to her rental @ 😂 We do find it funny that after the tough talk she had she has been seen ran off by the person she hated the most; guess who LOL! Later today we will be posting everything involving rah / @raelyn / jacina including clips of her begging for valentino on her VR heads
🚨JUST IN: Rah / @raelyn also known as Jacina has given her unknown friend 'weeb MM' access to her account in the meantime for her disappearance DWC: This weeb MM girl is shady, she seems to be sending very strange photos / videos to valentino on her free time 😂 Should we post on this 'weeb MM' girl as she is fairly close to @raelyn the valentino victim?
👍7❤2
🚨JUST IN: There is a mass spread of fake intel being marked as 'valentino' which is ALL fake and some being out of context Not to mention EVERY piece of fake intel posted of valentino is debunked in t.me/valentinodebunk We're pretty certain the only people believing this fake intel is the bully victims of valentino on multiple occasions
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rahlorebook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Should we drop everything on @raelyn today?
- Yes95%
- No9%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What more do you want to see of rah / @raelyn?
- NSFW (audios included)77%
- Sexting / Begging DMs13%
- More Info9%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2025 to 28 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@rahlorebook named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 9 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rah/Raelyn Lorebook” (@rahlorebook), 232 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rahlorebook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.