Channel
@val_skazal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
95subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003179628466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @val_skazal |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/val_skazal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 95 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 92 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 92 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (16 March 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 51 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
65 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 56.9% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 12.3% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 3.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ИИ. Игрушка инфлюенсеров или новый этап человечества? 📱 Сейчас для большинства ИИ выглядит как модный атрибут: - кто‑то играет с агентами - кто‑то просит чат написать пост - кто‑то генерирует карусели для инсзапретограма Легко подумать что вся эта история с ИИ просто очередной хайп, часто пункты выше с ИИ тратят больше времени чем самому сделать! 😁😁 Я вижу другую картину из трёх уровней: Игроки, Инструменты, Резул…
❤4🕊1
АНТРОПИКИ держат пользователей на поводке с помощью новой FABLE 5 Есть такой фаундер биотех‑стартапа - Дэвид Фридберг Они в Ohalo Genetics с помощью моделей модифицируют гены и белки для сельского хозяйства. Работа, на которую у учёных уходили месяцы в лаборатории, у них занимала считанные часы с помощью самых современных моделей ИИ. Полгода они так и жили: загружают данные, формулируют задачу, модель выдаёт вари…
🔥2🕊2❤1
Зацените статистику на скрине! Наше расширение по отслеживанию лимитов ChatGPT/Клода подхватила волна установок в браузере, похоже реально полезная и удобная штука получилась! Я постоянно лазил в настройки, проверял лимиты чтоб понимать когда упрусь, или чтоб понимать какая задача сколько занимает в реальности. Особенно если используешь агентов в сторонних интерфейсах типа VS Code, это не всегда удобно реализовано. …
❤2🔥2👍1
На каком ты этапе пользования ИИ?
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Технари, нетехнари, вайбкодеры, предприниматели, фрилансеры… …да и вообще все кто тут читает (мама ты тут?) Я много снимаю на ютуб и даю информацию чаще всего там раздаю пользу (кстати подписывайтесь) Но вот телеграм пустует, решил исправлять и сейчас разрабатываю рубрики И чтобы рубрики несли ту пользу, которая будет полезна на конкретном этапе погружения в ИИ Проголосуйте ниже в опросе, это на общее благо Кажд…
❤4
Так как я активно слежу за ИТ сектором, не смог пройти мимо такого события Попытался сделать карусель для ТГ даже :) Из Гугла уволилось на днях пара ключевых содрудников что трудились над ИИ. Один из них Нобелевку даже получал! Конечно там машина большая и еще талантов хватает, никуда Гугл не денется с рынка, и все так же будет в топе за счет своей экосистемы. Но что эпичного в этой новости, что акции Google поте…
🔥2🕊2❤1
Как объяснить монтажёру правки за 5 минут вместо 40 Я хоть и предприниматеаль но в последнее время часто работал с монтажерами и продюссерами. Вот пришел предварительный монтаж видоса/шортса: хочу переставить блоки местами. И приходится переписывать руками текст который слышу в видео, а то как ещё объяснить? Реально на шортс в 1 мин уходит минут 40 возни. У меня есть для такого сайд-проект: скилл транскрипции для C…
❤4🔥3
В эпоху всего ИИ-шного Валера фотается для неИИ-заставок на Ютуб:)) 🤦♂️ Теперь по теме поста Вы купили себе ИИ или дорогую игрушку? Я видел такое: Купили подписки, дали сотрудникам «поиграться», бюджет освоили. А бизнес как работал, так и работает. Чтобы ИИ начал приносить деньги, надо пройти вполне конкретный путь, но большинство застревает в самом начале. Старт почти у всех одинаковый: вайб-кодинг и радость. Ты…
👍4❤2
Валерий Кузнецов ИИ практика pinned «Как я вообще оказался в IT У меня техническое образование - Информ Технологии НГУ, но я рано понял что программистом не стану. Наверное не хватало усидчивости и в должной мере мозгов, чтоб стать очень крутым кодером. Абы каким не хотелось. Такое признание…»
Впервые написал статью на VC, там вообще кто то еще пишет не-нейрослоп? =) https://vc.ru/life/2966881-minimax-m3-obzor-i-testirovanie-novykh-vozmozhnostei-modeli (Странно, даже превью нет 😤)
🔥4❤2😱2
Channel name was changed to «Валерий Кузнецов ИИ практика»
Локальный ИИ прямо в Хроме уже работает. Полгода как Все ИИ-расширения для браузера устроены примерно одинаково. Шлют скриншоты ваших браузеров на свой сервер, там что-то думают, возвращают инструкции куда тыкать. Печально медленно, токены улетают за пару запросов, и хбз что там в облаке с вашими данными. Google на этом фоне тихо растит локальные ИИ прямо в Хроме (руки-то длиннющие). В прошлом году Gemini Nano работ…
👍3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @val_skazal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На каком ты этапе пользования ИИ?
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,166,077 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Валерий Кузнецов ИИ практика” (@val_skazal), 95 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/val_skazal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.