Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ваан Бабаян

@vahanbabayan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

852subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002279496329
TypeChannel
Username@vahanbabayan
DescriptionМнение,прогнозы,аналитика и конечно новости
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vahanbabayan

Growth

8528 Aug 2026, 11:19 — 852 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:20 — 852 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:198 Aug 2026, 11:20
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 851–853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:20852no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:19852first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.75%
avg views ÷ 852 subscribers
Avg views / post
66.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held18 (23 February 202628 July 2026)
Views total66
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
36
Videos
38
Links
87

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14m 33s
Average length
2m 05s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,384 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
38516.1%
👍35815.0%
🎉34314.4%
🔥33113.9%
🤩32613.7%
🥰31713.3%
👏31513.2%
👌30.126%
🤡30.126%
😁20.084%
🤮10.042%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,384reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С момента вступления в ЕАЭС мы не проводили референдума, следовательно, в выходе или отказе в этом также нет необходимости Вопрос "остаться или выйти?" уже загоняет нас в ловушку всей нации. Прежде чем проводить референдум, тем более что в подобных вопросах мы должны в первую очередь понимать часть ответственности правительства. Если спросить у народа, естественно что большинство захотят поехать в ЕС и выйти из ЕАЭС

4

18 May 2026, 18:41 UTC111 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vagharshak001Video

Ինչ՞ խորհրդարան ենք ստանալու.Վաղարշակ Հարությունյան Какой парламент мы получим?Вагаршак Арутюнян

3

18 May 2026, 15:35 UTC99 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vagharshak001

https://youtu.be/jLJBcVmf4jY?si=nMYdtMuW0KDjoUk-

2

15 May 2026, 06:20 UTC84 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vagharshak001Video

🇦🇲✅1️⃣ Քարոզարշավ Երևան

2

12 May 2026, 06:23 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vagharshak001Video

🇦🇲Օր 3-րդ.✅1 Քարոարշավ

4

10 May 2026, 18:05 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vagharshak001Video

🇦🇲2026 Քարոզարշավ օր 2-րդ

3

9 May 2026, 06:24 UTC65 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vagharshak001Video

🇦🇲2026 Քարոզարշավ Օր 1-ին

4

24 Apr 2026, 14:07 UTC138 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Произошедшее в Карабахе — продолжение Геноцида, но уже в иной форме, сегодня вызовы стоят уже перед Сюником: экс-посол Армении в РФ Происходящие процессы имеют ту же логическую основу, что и политика Османской империи в период Геноцида, сказал журналистам в Цицернакаберде бывший министр обороны Армении и экс-посол в России Вагаршак Арутюнян. Он также отметил, что игнорирование исторического опыта недопустимо. Забыт

5

19 Apr 2026, 16:17 UTC≈3,840 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

За кого проголосуйте на выборах парламента Армении 7-ого июня 2026года?

  1. Никол Пашинян41%
  2. Вагаршак Арутюнян10%
  3. Гагик Царукян6%
  4. Самвел Карапетян7%
  5. Арман Татоян21%
  6. Роберт Кочарян0%
  7. Айк Марутян0%
  8. Левон Зурабян0%
  9. Эдмон Марукян15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁21👌1

17 Apr 2026, 18:50 UTC103 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vagharshak001

https://youtu.be/j5978W-OL_U?si=i26BX0gnf5Uc8XDE

👍32

17 Apr 2026, 08:41 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vagharshak001Video

✔️Դիտեք 24news-ով գեներալ Վաղարշակ Հարությունյանի հարցազրույցը

👍4

14 Apr 2026, 09:44 UTC247 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🇦🇲2026🔴Мы лучшая команда!!!

4👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vahanbabayan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Apr 2026, 16:17 UTCAnonymous Poll3,530 voters approx.

За кого проголосуйте на выборах парламента Армении 7-ого июня 2026года?

  1. Никол Пашинян41%
  2. Вагаршак Арутюнян10%
  3. Гагик Царукян6%
  4. Самвел Карапетян7%
  5. Арман Татоян21%
  6. Роберт Кочарян0%
  7. Айк Марутян0%
  8. Левон Зурабян0%
  9. Эдмон Марукян15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 235,116 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ваан Бабаян” (@vahanbabayan), 852 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vahanbabayan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.