Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Чай с гвоздями

Channel

Чай с гвоздями

@vaforks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

846subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001654296866
TypeChannel
Username@vaforks
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vaforks

Growth

8468728597 August 2026 — 872 subscribers8 August 2026 — 872 subscribers16 August 2026 — 858 subscribers24 August 2026 — 846 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 842–876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 11:37846-12
16 Aug 2026, 03:17858-14
8 Aug 2026, 01:16872no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:41872first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 846 subscribers
Avg views / post
86.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total346
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

254 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9135.8%
🤣7128.0%
🔥5722.4%
💯197.48%
🤡72.76%
😱62.36%
👏31.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC97 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣115🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC128 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как понять, что перед тобой адекватный парень, как понять, пробивает ли он почву для манипуляций над тобой или нет Обращаю внимание на мелочи, и детали, это важно ( ты же уже с мелочами сталкивалась со своим бывшим... п.c согласен неудачная шутка ниже пояса) Например, вы переписывались, тут время доходит до назначения свиданки, он инициатор все ок. Зеленый флаг: Он «я могу в пятницу в 20-00, тебе будет удобно?» К

8💯1🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC184 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мои дорогие всем привет , по тихоньку буду вести вк )) нужны ваши подписки.. https://vk.ru/vaforks

4🔥3💯1

10 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC311 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прикиньте… Только в фильмах мужчина появляется в конце. Когда уже всё плохо, город горит, злодей почти победил, надежды нет… И он берет всё в свои руки. Решает проблемы. Спасает всех. Финальные титры. А в жизни почему-то всё наоборот. Мужчина появляется в самом начале. И именно после этого начинается самое интересное. Внезапно ты начинаешь переживать из-за сообщений. Ждать ответа. Перестаешь спокойно спать. Ду

🔥104💯4

9 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC223 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в 17:00 по мск смотрим «Обсессия» https://www.twitch.tv/vaforks

3🔥3

8 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC205 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://www.twitch.tv/vaforks Сегодня таро раскалады и смотрим ждули!)

🔥4

7 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC195 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://www.twitch.tv/vaforks Готовим тар тар на твиче, заходите

🔥5

6 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC232 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто опаснее: нарцисс или психопат? Большинство думает, что психопат — это самый страшный человек, которого можно встретить. Но вот парадокс. Именно с нарциссами люди чаще годами живут, строят отношения, женятся, рожают детей… и только потом понимают, что постепенно потеряли себя. В чем разница? Нарциссу жизненно необходимо чувствовать свое превосходство. Он питается вашим вниманием, восхищением, чувством вины и

10🔥4😱3

4 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC252 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прикиньте, я сегодня понял одну странную вещь. Самые тяжелые разводы почему-то не с богатыми мужчинами. И даже не с теми, у кого есть имущество, бизнес или миллионы. Самые тяжелые разводы очень часто именно с теми, у кого за душой ничего нет. И речь сейчас вообще не про деньги. Потому что квартира делится за пару подписей. Машина тоже. Деньги можно заработать заново. А вот когда человек годами жил за счет твоей

11💯6🔥6

29 Jun 2026, 09:20 UTC279 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ты смотришь ему в глаза. А надо было — ниже. Вот вы сидите в ресторане. Ты честно пытаешься поддерживать зрительный контакт, ищешь в его глазах хоть намёк на интерес. А он уже пятнадцать минут рассказывает, почему все его бывшие были «не такими». Потом пересказывает конфликт из онлайн-игры. А под конец начинает объяснять, как бы он управлял страной, если бы ему дали шанс. Ты киваешь, улыбаешься из вежливости и счи

6🔥2🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vaforks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чай с гвоздями” (@vaforks), 846 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaforks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.