Channel
@v_dendy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
519subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001624586428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @v_dendy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/v_dendy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 519 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 518 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 519 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 519 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
207 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 71 | 34.3% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 23.7% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 13.0% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 7.73% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 5.80% | |
| 🏆 | 11 | 5.31% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 3.38% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.45% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.45% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 1.45% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.45% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.483% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.483% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 12 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С Пасхой Сегодня день, когда стоит вспомнить покой не приходит извне, его выстраиваешь сам. Тишина, ясность, вера в свой путь — это не подарок праздника, а ежедневная работа над собой. Желаю тебе силы принимать то, что не в твоей власти, и твёрдости менять то, что в ней. Меньше суеты больше смысла. Меньше шума и больше дела. Пусть близкие будут рядом, а ты верен себе.
❤🔥7🔥6👍4💘3
Anthropic подарил $200. использование сверх тарифа CLAUDE компенсирует пользователям две неприятности — утечку исходников Claude Code в марте и блокировку третьесторонних оболочек типа OpenClaw с 4 апреля. Жест доброй воли, но реально полезный Размер бонуса зависит от тарифа Проверьте, если у вас есть подписка, бонусы уже на счету.
👍5💯1🔥1
Как устроена платформа лидогенерации OPUS — от ноля до сделки за 14 дней Большинство SaaS-сервисов для бизнеса решают одну задачу. Email-рассылки. Чат-бот. CRM. Аналитика. Каждая стоит 5-50к в месяц. Получается 5 разных счетов и ноль связки между инструментами. OPUS решает другую задачу — собирает весь цикл работы с клиентом от первого касания до сделки в одну систему. Без зоопарка сервисов. 🤩 Архитектура — 5 мо…
💯3🔥3👍2
О чем рассказать в следующих постах? Выбирайте вектор:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2💯2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3👍3🔥2😁1
ChatGPT = 2000₽/мес + VPN + зарубежная карта 409 000 человек в месяц гуглят "gpt бесплатно" и попадают на скам-ботов. Я сделал нормальный продукт. На русском. Без VPN. Бесплатно. В Telegram. Завтра покажу что внутри. 🔥по классике
🔥10❤2👍2😍1
Это твой пра-пра-пра-пра-дед, где-то в хуйпойми каком году, в том же возрасте на полях, а ты боишься даже затестить АИ в своей работе ...
🤣6👍3💯1
6 уровней работы с Вайб Кодингом Большинство на первом. И думают, что познали вселенную 😂 Разбираю как есть: 1. Промптер Ты написал ей "привет, как дела" в два часа ночи. Иногда прокатывает, иногда — игнор. Ты не понимаешь почему. Винишь её. "Вайб-кодинг не работает" — это ты просто не умеешь писать первым. 2. Планировщик Ты уже не просто "привет". Ты спрашиваешь, что она любит, куда хочет, чему радуется. Plan Mo…
💯4🏆2👍2
🩸Код - как искусство Сегодня за 9 часов я установил весь этот список. На фрилансе это 3 недели работы на данный момент. Сегодня мы получаем независимость от своей страны и её политического и экономического курса. Получаем свободу от корпораций . Мы получаем шанс прожить нормальную жизнь, а не стать чьим-то трудовым ресурсом. Получаем жизнь! ⠀
❤7⚡3👍3
Кто пишет код, тот будет создавать алгоритм развития Подключил Claude Code — ИИ-программиста который сам настраивает серверы, пишет код и строит бизнес-инфраструктуру ... Скоро покажу что он умеет.
👍5💯2😍2
Пишет мне подруга UGC креатор Денис, мы продвигаем БАДы и спортивное питание. Мне надо делать по 10 роликов в день. Я так устала себя снимать с этими банками. Смотрю какие-то говорящие уроды с глазами и открытым ртом на базе флаконов, сделанные через нейросети, в набирают миллионы просмотров. С каждого просмотра я тяну рубль. Можешь помочь? Признаюсь честно — я не сталкивался с монтажом говорящих уродов. Монтиро…
👍6🏆4💯1
🩸Быть человеком - значит мыслить и стремиться к знанию.
👍6🏆3❤🔥1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @v_dendy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
О чем рассказать в следующих постах? Выбирайте вектор:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 12 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 958,459 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Денис Верняков | ИИ на практике” (@v_dendy), 519 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/v_dendy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.