Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

реееест Вавра Свэгова

@vAvrtr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

615subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002471883118
TypeChannel
Username@vAvrtr
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vAvrtr

Growth

614615614.56 Aug 2026, 18:33 — 614 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:57 — 615 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:336 Aug 2026, 23:57
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 614–615 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:57615+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:33614first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
92.3%
avg views ÷ 615 subscribers
Avg views / post
568
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (21 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,812
Reactions total600
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

600 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘17529.2%
custom 581434511692766052416727.8%
custom 52198489293649728409315.5%
custom 53214588748117175096010.0%
custom 5278775425399559750528.67%
custom 5911147147134244531406.67%
🦄122.00%
👾10.167%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
89
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
64
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vAvrtr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC79 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kiccthiefPhoto

первый реквест пошел #skethh

custom 591114714713424453116💘3custom 58143451169276605242

Signed Вавра swag

4 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC235 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вавра х2, вавроны, #комишки и карточка на клей с трюфелем

custom 591114714713424453124💘6custom 58143451169276605246custom 52787754253995597501

Signed Вавра swag

30 Jul 2026, 09:21 UTC≈1,360 views96 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Это было хорошо☕️

custom 581434511692766052460💘22custom 527877542539955975012custom 52198489293649728402

Signed Вавра swag

29 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC534 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я там была я там всех била я я я

custom 527877542539955975023custom 52198489293649728406💘4custom 58143451169276605244

Signed Вавра swag

27 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC635 views57 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дура все отстань иди мне молитвы возноси гiфт для халяльно

💘33custom 527877542539955975015custom 52198489293649728407custom 58143451169276605242

Signed Вавра swag

26 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC560 views29 reactions25 Starsread 6 August 2026

Пасиба за звёздочки 🙏 ЕБАТЬ СКОООЛЬКО ЧТО СКОЛЬКО

custom 521984892936497284020💘4custom 58143451169276605244custom 52787754253995597501

Signed Вавра swag

26 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC556 views60 reactions64 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кушать подано

custom 581434511692766052441custom 521984892936497284011💘4custom 53214588748117175094

Signed Вавра swag

26 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC565 views68 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#комишки мишкакомишка для моти

💘38custom 581434511692766052416custom 532145887481171750911custom 52198489293649728403

Signed Вавра swag

25 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC531 views56 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Гифт для моей любимой стар позорище 67

custom 521984892936497284030🦄12custom 581434511692766052410💘3👾1

Signed Вавра swag

25 Jul 2026, 06:07 UTC584 views56 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Лето солнце песок юпалопы 😺

💘31custom 581434511692766052415custom 521984892936497284010

Signed Вавра swag

22 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC554 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#комишки аыуыауыаыуаы оч много

custom 532145887481171750916💘10

Signed Вавра swag

21 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC619 views57 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мои карточки учасников для премии clay 🆒

custom 532145887481171750929💘17custom 58143451169276605247custom 52198489293649728404

Signed Вавра swag

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @vAvrtr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 59,232 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“реееест Вавра Свэгова” (@vAvrtr), 615 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vAvrtr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.