Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Agata‘s Dirty Talk

Channel

Agata‘s Dirty Talk

@v587Call

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

995subscribers

+281 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002329580045
TypeChannel
Username@v587Call
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/v587Call

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7061,003854.57 August 2026 — 714 subscribers8 August 2026 — 714 subscribers15 August 2026 — 708 subscribers22 August 2026 — 706 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,002 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,003 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,001 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,002 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,000 subscribers25 September 2026 — 995 subscribers9957 August 202625 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 49 days, net +281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 661–1,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 05:56995-5
12 Sept 2026, 23:401,000-2
9 Sept 2026, 06:161,002+1
3 Sept 2026, 16:371,001-2
31 Aug 2026, 18:561,003+1
29 Aug 2026, 04:341,002+296
22 Aug 2026, 22:36706-2
15 Aug 2026, 19:43708-6
8 Aug 2026, 02:16714no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:58714first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1030.3%
💩721.2%
🤡721.2%
🤮515.2%
🤣412.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

fourmeme继续做这个的概率极大,除非后面跑出其他很nb的叙事flip,但目前来看应该不会。 筹码高控,叙事也比gpu强 0x57aedac0ccaafdec0ec62fc4fbfd8252735affff

🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC107 viewsread 8 August 2026

64这个位置硬的要死 感觉像诱多 加密资产没啥波动性了

3 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC131 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

空了点btc 止损放在前高 止盈63000

❤2

3 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC132 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

最近在看一些大周期的指标 等我抄底了跟你们说

🤮2

29 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC182 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

之前看到个傻逼说法 各大交易所做一堆美股infra是为了给加密虹吸美股流动性 当时就觉得很搞笑 我不否定链上美股确实交易很便利 Hyper liquid也确实比传统市场更快的掌握了定价权 (比如cxmt ) 但我是美股玩家 为什么要买全是诈骗垃圾的项目呢 近一年上的Crypto项目 什么zk ai赛道币价基本都跌了99% 现在好了 币圈大哥们和存量们这波美股亏晕过去了 充当流动性了

💩2

29 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC179 viewsread 8 August 2026

去年全亏完了 还有信心一定能赚回来 现在在想 去哪里能赚点钱呢 https://x.com/0xagata/status/2082486203241357739?s=46

27 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC184 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

感觉快熊底了 感触很深 因为自己一边打工一边炒币 现在真的太难了

🤮2❤1

27 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

赌博日记 今天又亏了好多米 项目方太坏了

🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @v587Call. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Agata‘s Dirty Talk” (@v587Call), 995 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/v587Call.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.