fourmeme继续做这个的概率极大,除非后面跑出其他很nb的叙事flip,但目前来看应该不会。 筹码高控,叙事也比gpu强 0x57aedac0ccaafdec0ec62fc4fbfd8252735affff
🤡1

Channel
@v587Call
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
995subscribers
+281 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002329580045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @v587Call |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/v587Call |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 995 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 1,000 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 1,002 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 1,001 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 1,003 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 1,002 | +296 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 706 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 708 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 714 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 714 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
33 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 30.3% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 21.2% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 21.2% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 15.2% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 12.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
fourmeme继续做这个的概率极大,除非后面跑出其他很nb的叙事flip,但目前来看应该不会。 筹码高控,叙事也比gpu强 0x57aedac0ccaafdec0ec62fc4fbfd8252735affff
🤡1
4年一度的转折又让我空到了?
🤣4
64这个位置硬的要死 感觉像诱多 加密资产没啥波动性了
空了点btc 止损放在前高 止盈63000
❤2
最近在看一些大周期的指标 等我抄底了跟你们说
🤮2
Video, posted without a caption
之前看到个傻逼说法 各大交易所做一堆美股infra是为了给加密虹吸美股流动性 当时就觉得很搞笑 我不否定链上美股确实交易很便利 Hyper liquid也确实比传统市场更快的掌握了定价权 (比如cxmt ) 但我是美股玩家 为什么要买全是诈骗垃圾的项目呢 近一年上的Crypto项目 什么zk ai赛道币价基本都跌了99% 现在好了 币圈大哥们和存量们这波美股亏晕过去了 充当流动性了
💩2
去年全亏完了 还有信心一定能赚回来 现在在想 去哪里能赚点钱呢 https://x.com/0xagata/status/2082486203241357739?s=46
定投$hype $crcl
🤡5💩1🤮1
感觉快熊底了 感触很深 因为自己一边打工一边炒币 现在真的太难了
🤮2❤1
赚回来了 想少亏钱的诀窍就是不在bsc接痰
赌博日记 今天又亏了好多米 项目方太坏了
🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @v587Call. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Agata‘s Dirty Talk” (@v587Call), 995 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/v587Call.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.