Channel
@uzargument
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
647subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001221335421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uzargument |
| Created | 8 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uzargument |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 647 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 652 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 653 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 653 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
293 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 178 | 60.8% | |
| 🎉 | 28 | 9.56% | |
| 😱 | 24 | 8.19% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 7.51% | |
| 😢 | 21 | 7.17% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 5.46% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2022 to 14 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aktual: Sizda qaysi biridan muammo bo’lmoqda?
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😢6👍2
2022 yilda O’zbekistonda “Yil sportchilari” maqomini qaysi sportchilarimizga bergan bo’lar edingiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍4
Bugun, farzandingiz yoki ukangiz, singlingiz, jiyaningiz maktabga bordimi (yoki boradimi)? (o’zingizchi? agar ta’lim tizimida ishlasangiz)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2
Hozirda telekanallarda qo’yilayotgan seriallar ichida muntazam tomosha qilayotganingiz:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
So’rovnomani to’htatsak ham bo’ladi Argentinani belgilanganlarni tabriklaymiz! 🎉🎉
👍6
Аргентина становится чемпионом мира! Обыграв сборную Франции в серии пенальти, основное время завершилось 2:2, дополнительное 3:3. Поздравляем Месси и его команду! https://t.me/uzargument
👍6
Shu bugungi o’yin bahona kanalimizni qayta boshlab yubora qolamizmi? Shuddat bilan o’tayotgan o’yinda Jahon kubogini qaysi jamoa ko’taradi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍4
Rasmiy saytlardan ushbu xabar feyk ekanligi tasdiqlandi. So’rovnomani to’htatishga qaror qildik! Faollik uchun hammaga katta rahmat!
👍11🤩2
👆 Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda mana shu xabar tarqalmoqda. Xabarga aniqlik kiritilguncha, so’rovnoma o’tqizib ko’ramiz. Faolroq bo’ling! Toshkent shahar hokimligiga qaysi nomzod loyiq deb o’ylaysiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🎉7👍5🔥4😢4❤2😱1
#Тезкор #Диққат ❗️ Билгичларнинг айтишича, Масс медиа рахбари Комил Алламжонов Тошкент шаҳар ҳокими лавозимига тайёрланмоқда экан. Хабарингиз бор, Комил Алламжонов Масс Медиада рахбарликдан ташқари - Автотест, МиллийТв, Кун.Уз, Қалампир.Уз, Газета.Уз, Дарё.Уз, хайдовчилик гувохномаси олиш учун ягона имтихон маркази, УзИмей, Хумо карт лойихалари рахнамоси хисобланади. Жахонгир Ортиқхўжаев қайси лавозимга ўтиши хози…
👍10😢7😱2
Chempionlar ligasi play-off bosqichi davom etadi. Bugun eng qiziqarli o’yinlardan biri. Qaysi jamoa yutadi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍6
Bolajonlar uchun yangi, judayam qiziq loyiha boshlash arafasidamiz. Farzandlaringiz ham so’rovnomada faol ishtirok etishiga imkon bering! Qaysi qahramonlar qiziqroq? (2-qism)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uzargument. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 14 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Aktual: Sizda qaysi biridan muammo bo’lmoqda?
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2022 yilda O’zbekistonda “Yil sportchilari” maqomini qaysi sportchilarimizga bergan bo’lar edingiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Bugun, farzandingiz yoki ukangiz, singlingiz, jiyaningiz maktabga bordimi (yoki boradimi)? (o’zingizchi? agar ta’lim tizimida ishlasangiz)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Hozirda telekanallarda qo’yilayotgan seriallar ichida muntazam tomosha qilayotganingiz:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Shu bugungi o’yin bahona kanalimizni qayta boshlab yubora qolamizmi? Shuddat bilan o’tayotgan o’yinda Jahon kubogini qaysi jamoa ko’taradi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆 Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda mana shu xabar tarqalmoqda. Xabarga aniqlik kiritilguncha, so’rovnoma o’tqizib ko’ramiz. Faolroq bo’ling! Toshkent shahar hokimligiga qaysi nomzod loyiq deb o’ylaysiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2022 to 14 January 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 288,943 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UzArgument” (@uzargument), 647 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uzargument.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.