Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Главная Героиня

Channel

Главная Героиня

@uye_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,519subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001207014303
TypeChannel
Username@uye_channel
Created31 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/uye_channel

Growth

8,5068,5308,5186 August 2026 — 8,530 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,521 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,508 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,506 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,517 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,506 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,512 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,518 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,519 subscribers8,5196 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,502–8,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 11:498,519+1
26 Aug 2026, 01:338,518+6
22 Aug 2026, 17:268,512+6
19 Aug 2026, 16:328,506-11
16 Aug 2026, 20:378,517+11
13 Aug 2026, 10:068,506-2
10 Aug 2026, 11:138,508-13
7 Aug 2026, 07:028,521-9
6 Aug 2026, 08:378,530first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.09%
avg views ÷ 8,519 subscribers
Avg views / post
519
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 47 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held48 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total24,899
Reactions total1,254
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 27s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,211 reactions across 46 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
45437.5%
🤣19416.0%
🔥19115.8%
👍18315.1%
🤪705.78%
👏675.53%
🤓423.47%
custom 525348181753256588480.661%
custom 540451508982069946320.165%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 48 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uye_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC287 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Цитаты великих (подростков, которые живут у меня дома): я что, дурочка что ли, на отдыхе книжки читать??? 😐 Тем временем я на отдыхе:

🤣24🤪5🤓4

27 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC334 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Уже завтра встречаемся на разговорном Зуме! 28 августа 19:00-20:20 (мск) ☝🏼до 1 сентября действует код ВСТРЕЧА на любой из Зумов Вместе мы будем обсуждать статьи из англоязычных журналов, которые я разбираю в своем клубе с разборами журналов (ну я никак не придумаю название!) и практиковать английский так, что вы сами удивишься, как легко начинают складываться фразы. Что вас ждёт на Зуме: 🩷Никаких домашних задан

5👍2🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC344 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

А вот какую красоту я сделала на выходных потому что не умею преподавать английский как все приличные люди только по учебникам! Всё про клуб и зумы тут.

👍116🔥3

26 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC410 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Так вот зачем был нужен отпуск! Да-да, это все мои книги, надеюсь, никого не забыла! И да, вы видите сразу аж 4 новые книги, ждём выхода серии со дня на день! 📕 Больше книг богу книг и больше английского богу английского! 😈

👍17👏119🔥2🤓2

26 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC406 views35 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Если вам все ещё кажется, что мужчина с температурой 37 это самая страшная картина мучений и умираний от страданий (стихотворение получилось случайно), то вы просто давно не жили в одном номере с мужчиной, который сгорел на солнце. Благодарите судьбу! — ✨ Разговорные Зумы (следующий - 28 августа) ✨ Оффлайн практикум по английскому в Москве 29 августа

🤣256🔥3🤪1

25 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC486 views42 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Вообще, это очень похоже на шизофрению. Я, конечно, не сталкивалась прямо с диагностированным человеком (или сталкивалась, но он мне не говорил), но из популярный культуры я знаю, что голоса в голове это один из симптомов. Становится страшновато. Вроде бы я просто плыву в бассейне, но то в левом, то в правом ухе, прямо внутри черепа, я слышу голоса: Подожди! Отдай! Это мои очки! Ну покатай меня! Смотри-смотри как

🤣286🤪5🤓3

25 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC493 views16 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Ну что, так выглядит голосование когда ты сам себя ээээ перехитрил! Я ведь прекрасно объясняю грамматику на индивидуальных уроках, горжусь этим без ложной скромности. Но для марафонов я не брала грамматику наверное лет шесть. Хотя тогда получилось замечательно. И что это было? Не знаю! Абсолютно ведь очевидно, что грамматика, база, структура - это идеальный материал для марафона. Мы думаем так делать: 5 недель 5 вр

10👍3🔥2🤪1

25 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC463 viewsread 26 August 2026
Poll

Обсуждаем с Аней наши онлайн-форматы на осень (приметный формат - короткий марафон на 4 недели прямо в Телеграм), что вам было бы интереснее)

  1. Марафон по песням21%
  2. Марафон по эпизоду «Секса в большом городе»42%
  3. Марафон по грамматике - разложить по полочкам 5-7 времен60%
  4. Другое - пишите в комментарии2%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC535 views10 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Я знаю, как сложно бывает перейти от «я всё понимаю в тексте» к «я свободно говорю на английском». Я 18 лет преподаю английский и знаю, что учить язык и разговаривать на языке - не одно и то же. И единственный способ заговорить на языке - это заговорить на языке. С огромной радостью и предвкушением нашей встречи объявляю: к разборам статей англоязычных журналов я добавляю разговорные Зумы — и не просто с преподават

6👍2🔥2

24 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC583 views28 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

🤣🤦🏻‍♀️ А что вообще происходит? Подряд пришло несколько вот таких схожих сообщений, где странные люди предлагают мне прислать им свою книгу абсолютно бесплатно, прямо через директ запрещенной сети. Это что за тренд? Если что, все мои книги доступны в хороших книжных (если их там нет, уходите, это НЕ хороший книжный) и на всех существующих маркетплейсах! А часть книг можно найти на сервисах Строки, Яндекс книги, Ли

🤪1210🔥6

23 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC615 views15 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Я люблю вызовы и решила попробовать совместить всё, что вы так любите и хотите видеть на практикуме. Поработаем по всем материалам: песням, моей книге use your Girl Power!, отрывку сериала “Секс в большом городе” и статьям из современных глянцевых журналов. 29 августа 19:00-21:00 Москва Практикум по всему Я уже 18 лет преподаю английский по интересным материалам и попробую совместить так много разных в один практик

10👍3🔥2

23 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC600 views29 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Собрала для ЛитРес свои любимые книги про мозг. Рекомендую этот список всем, у кого есть мозг интерес к развитию и саморазвитию!

👍187🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @uye_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@uye_channel edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

Обсуждаем с Аней наши онлайн-форматы на осень (приметный формат - короткий марафон на 4 недели прямо в Телеграм), что вам было бы интереснее)

  1. Марафон по песням21%
  2. Марафон по эпизоду «Секса в большом городе»42%
  3. Марафон по грамматике - разложить по полочкам 5-7 времен60%
  4. Другое - пишите в комментарии2%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

27 августа встречаемся на практикуме по:

  1. Песням33%
  2. Книге с историями великих женщин Use your Girl Power!40%
  3. Статьям из глянцевых журналов36%
  4. Смотреть и обсуждать «Секс в большом городе»49%

The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 305,258 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Главная Героиня” (@uye_channel), 8,519 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uye_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.