Photo, posted without a caption
🤬1

Channel
@uxcreep
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002098877382 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uxcreep |
| Description | Дизайн-крип. Статьи, разгоны, разборы и кайфы 🤓 По всем вопросам: @boringbor Статьи: https://habr.com/ru/users/UXCreep/articles/ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uxcreep |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 08:22 | 60 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 07:47 | 60 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
112 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 34.8% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 27.7% | |
| custom 5976546120229196131 | 24 | 21.4% | |
| custom 5895558979945238083 | 8 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5242485713412299371 | 7 | 6.25% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.893% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2025 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
🤬1
Йоу! На следующей неделе расскажу вам о долгожданном проекте, который спустя 7 месяцев наконец увидел свет. Крупный проект моего домена в Озоне, который мы довольно быстро придумали, долго согласовывали и наконец выкатили ☝️🤓
🔥7custom 59765461202291961315custom 52424857134122993714
Кстати, автор недавно стал магистром дизайна и маркетинга🤓 Никита Дик (запомните имя, ещё услышите) организовал кайфовый выпускной и на нём я впервые кому-то играл на барабанах. Уровень любительский, возможно кринж, но как же мне понравилось, вы бы знали… Если думаете поступать в магистратуру на дизайн, то знайте — это место скорее для знакомств и новых друзей, особенно если вы уже работаете. Так и получилось. У м…
❤14
Йоу, папищики! Сёдня был на Кайференции. Спасибо Веронике 🙏 В целом прикольный опыт, стилёвый брендинг, но в следующий раз компанией надо прийти и в диз-баттле поучаствовать. Ждите 🤓
🔥7❤3
Привет! Я Борис Петросян, младший продуктовый дизайнер в Отзывах. Смотря ролик про китайский UX, я вдруг понял, что где-то уже всё это видел. Мне стало интересно, какие особенности в интерфейсах есть в Азии, на Западе и что мы, как дизайнеры из России и в целом русскоязычного сегмента, заимствуем извне. Почему те же китайцы делают свой дизайн перегруженным, а мы часто делаем упор на визуал. Так и родилась идея стат…
❤11🔥10custom 59765461202291961319
А вот и статья для Озона 🤓
В фигму добавили голосовой чат?) Заметил случайно иконку наушников при шеринге. Решение на уровне прикола, но надо потестить. Рабочие созвоны переносим в фигму? 🤓 UPD: фиче оказывается миллион лет, но за это время особо никак её не развили и не подсветили, а я только заметил 💅
С Новым годом, дорогие папищики. Кайфуйте в новом году в 2026 раз больше! Днём ждите пост со статьей обновлённой 💅
🔥4
Привет, крипы! Давно меня не было В последнее время много работал и думал как разнообразить канал. Обновлений много, работы предвидится ещё больше, поэтому ждите. Скоро будут дополнения статей, лекции и новые статьи. Есть план и я его придерживаюсь как могу. А пока скажу, что обновил телефончик и попробовал Liquid Glass. Супер нравятся новые паттерны, переезд инпутов вниз, сафари со своими жестами, кайфую от таких …
❤7🔥3
🤡 Йоу, крипы! В Фигме уже сегодня должны выпустить Liquid Glass. Вчера запостили об этом событии микро-тизер. Видос прям короткий, но по визуалу примерно то же самое, что мы видели у Apple и это уже круто. Да, кто-то скажет, что фича выходит, когда сами яблочники чуть отошли от своей концепции, но это все фигня, я думаю. Целевой вариант, я уверен, прозрачный как и был изначально, просто нужно немного доработать ото…
custom 59765461202291961316❤4custom 52424857134122993713💩1
Я просто оставлю это здесь https://youtu.be/IjmJU29OxX8?si=dULpqhejN31E07DZ
От нового паттерна показа рекламы в ВК кайфуйте 💅
custom 58955589799452380836🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @uxcreep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UXCreep” (@uxcreep), 60 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uxcreep.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.