Channel
@ux_pechka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,425subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001430960404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ux_pechka |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ux_pechka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 1,425 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 1,425 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 18 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
280 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 26.4% | |
| 💩 | 44 | 15.7% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 13.6% | |
| 😁 | 37 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 10.0% | |
| 🖕 | 26 | 9.29% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 3.57% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.07% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.07% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.714% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.714% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.714% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.357% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2024 to 2 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Эволюция ТГ-каналов о UX-редактуре Когда я создавала этот канал в 2020 году, было модно постить кейсы других компаний, критиковать их или предлагать улучшения (я так делала и делаю). Шли годы, тренд сменился, и многие перестали постить контент по типу «смотрите, что нашла». На замену пришли текстовые посты-рассуждения-мнения про жизнь, карьеру, отношения с коллегами и прочее. Авторы из амбассадоров UX-редактуры ста…
❤21
Допустима ли ирония или сарказм в общении с пользователями?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
вопрос к вам⬇️
😁27❤1
Точка Банк ищет Middle UX-редактора. Точка Банк — финтех-компания, которая создаёт онлайн-банк и другие сервисы для бизнеса. 📍От 150 000 ₽. Удалёнка или работа в офисе, мы есть в 20 городах по всей стране. У нас комьюнити UX-редакторов, прописанный TOV, гайды и библиотеки. Мы ждём, что редактор будет бороться за стиль коммуникации Точки в интерфейсах и помогать в разработке сервисов. Что делать: — Писать тексты д…
❤3
еще немного фоточек с митапа💔
🔥9❤4
24 июня прошёл офлайн-митап «Как UX-редактура влияет на бизнес» Ловите записи выступлений на ютуб-канале MTS Design: 📌Олеся Кайгородова, МТС: Как измерять работу UX-редактора, не привлекая внимания санитаров 📌Аня Акулова, Авито: Роль редактора в продукте. Как приносить максимум пользы бизнесу 📌Диана Ивановская, Т-Банк: Объединяй и властвуй: чем дружба бота и оператора полезна бизнесу 📌Лена Колесник, ВКонтакте: Ка…
❤13🥰3🔥2
Главное мероприятие этого лета⚡️⚡️⚡️Приглашаем на митап «Как UX-редактура влияет на бизнес». Когда: 24 июня с 14.00 до 18.00 Поговорим о том, в чём важность UX-редактуры, как измерять работу редактора и как бизнесу понять, нужен ли редактор вообще. Бонус: прогноз по развитию рынка UXW от Киры Калимулиной. Кому митап будет полезен: редакторам, аналитикам, продакт-менеджерам, дизайнерам и оунерам. Программа: ⚡️Оле…
🔥17❤4
Заметила два слова, которые часто сейчас пишут с ошибкой. Это слова с «оо»: координально и вообщем. Режет глаз, но как будто окно Овертона в социальных сетях становится все шире и в каждый последующий раз думаешь: «ошибка конечно, но так много кто пишет, да и ладно». Вижу пару причин этого явления (на самом деле таких слов много, но меня эмоционально цепляют эти два): 1. То, что много раз повторили в соцсетях, ста…
❤13😢10👏5💔2
Самокат продолжает экспериментировать с названием категорий. Категория «Новинки» стала называться «Только завезли», а не-продукты — «Штучки!». Интересно наблюдать, как сервисы переиспользуют находки друг друга. К примеру, вслед за Самокатом плашка «Раскупили» была замечена в Wildberries. Правда, ненадолго: WB быстро вернули «Нет в наличии».
👍14👎5💩3🤮1
Стало интересно, измеряют ли эффективность работы UX-редакторов в других компаниях. Поделитесь, как устроено у вас?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2
Алексей Чупин, экс-дизайн-директор МТС и VK, поделился презентацией о том, как оформить портфолио, с которым тебя точно наймут. Это рекомендации для дизайнеров, но, считаю, будут мега-полезными для UX-редакторов. Хорошие художники копируют, великие - воруют. Короче, давайте подглядывать за дизайнерами, у них интересно.
🔥7❤2
Всем привет. Выкладываю для вас презентацию моего выступления на Dprofile Fest. Спасибо большое всем, кто пришел послушать. Отдельное спасибо всем, кто задавал вопросы: это впервые у меня, когда все 100% вопросов после выступления были настолько качественными и острыми. Это было прям удовольствие. © Алексей Чупин Channel
❤6👍3❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ux_pechka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Допустима ли ирония или сарказм в общении с пользователями?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Стало интересно, измеряют ли эффективность работы UX-редакторов в других компаниях. Поделитесь, как устроено у вас?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2024 to 2 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 842,139 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UX Печка” (@ux_pechka), 1,425 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ux_pechka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.