Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Утя мотя

@utkamoty

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

324subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002038619299
TypeChannel
Username@utkamoty
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/utkamoty

Growth

321324322.58 Aug 2026, 03:48 — 321 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:31 — 321 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:57 — 324 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:488 Aug 2026, 18:57
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 321–324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:57324+3
8 Aug 2026, 07:31321no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:48321first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
115.9%
avg views ÷ 324 subscribers
Avg views / post
376
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (21 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total6,760
Reactions total928
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

928 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33936.5%
❤‍🔥20622.2%
custom 539550238441790313613114.1%
custom 5438276955856217662778.30%
464.96%
🔥464.96%
😨293.13%
custom 5395362355599156580262.80%
custom 5438125107287466922151.62%
custom 5440577125591592368101.08%
custom 544049340379408794130.323%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 928reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
275
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 18 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @utkamoty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC230 views82 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Утренняя вылазка за родственниками пришельцев Так хотелось порисовать водичку, прям очень сильно (из-за другой работы). И моё любимое утро, куда же без него, расслабляет данное время суток Спасибо за внимание, я наконец-то спать... утром... да, как и этот арт 👀 #абдукция

43custom 543827695585621766222custom 544057712559159236810custom 544049340379408794132❤‍🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC438 views98 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, хеллоу, я тут умудрилась !наконец! переехать. Могу немного рисовать, пока тут попутно разбираю ОЧЕЕЕНЬ много вещей 😧 Сделала ещё новые эмодзи реакты на канал (спасибо бустам Лютика, повод ещё порисовать стикосы (хочу ещё каких нить два отрисовать, раз 6 реактов можно)) Так что- можете спокойно ставить хорошиков 🌟 #абдукция

custom 543827695585621766254❤‍🔥24custom 5438125107287466922155

29 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC330 views44 reactions14 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как вы так быстро рисуете? Можете поделиться своими рекомендациями, подсказками, пожалуйста? —— Большое спасибо за вопрос!! Не уверена, что я тот человек, который быстро рисует (могу целыми сутками напролёт рисовать, но) Могу посоветовать из базового: 1. Научиться проводить быстрые линии с попыткой передать объект (можно несколько таких штрихов) 2. Научиться делать акценты на работе и что стоит детализировать, а что

❤‍🔥239custom 53955023844179031365🔥4custom 539536235559915658021

29 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC186 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cerher_hexVideo

🎞➿➿➿❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️➿➿➿🎞 🌟🦷🥹🥹🥹🥹 « Свет, камера, мотор! Не отрывайте глаза, ведь всеми любимый телеведущий снова выходит на экраны телевизоров !! Будьте внимательнее, не пропустите ни одной детали ! Кто знает, какая мистика за занавесом повседневности? » #видосек #абдукция

custom 5395502384417903136184🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 20:53 UTC284 views45 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

кто больше всего импонирует как персонаж?) —- Я очевидно очень люблю Кирилла (через опять же свою призму восприятия). Скорее всего я бы его одного рисовала, если бы не нашла для себя Дарилл Но в целом, мне нравится о нём размышлять и каким существом он является на самом деле (Да и о его чертах характера. Мне импонирует характер и как его постепенно раскрывают. Для меня взрывом была 5 серия и я ОЧЕЕЕНЬ много думала о

30custom 53953623555991565809custom 53955023844179031364❤‍🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC244 views47 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чем тебе нравятся дариллы? 🥹 — Мне с самого начала Дариллы показались милыми до их конкретики в отношениях (ощущение, знаете, потенциала сбалансированного пейра, где есть и что-то милое и что то грустное (возможно что-то evil моментами)) И конечно же, лично во мне этот пейринг нравится за "подумать и поразмышлять". Мой мозг понимает их взаимоотношения через свою призму восприятия и проложил своё комфортное видение (

❤‍🔥27custom 5395502384417903136107custom 53953623555991565802🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC258 views45 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока есть время почиллить, могу поотвечать на вопросы, если таковые есть 👀 (Мне интересно-) Буду прикладывать микро скетчи абдукняшек в кошачьих ушках. А то слишком много стекла в последнее время

🔥27❤‍🔥86custom 539536235559915658021custom 54382769558562176621

28 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC179 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @jun00iPhoto

Ой, сорри, две одинаковые фотки скинула СПОЙЛЕРЫ НА 10Ю СЕРИЮ!!! Вайб Дани в психушке заставил меня пересмотреть «Майора Грома: Чумного доктора». Мне ещё тогда, в 21–22-м, нравилась тема подорванной психики Разумовского — у них много общего...🐁🧪💉

15custom 53955023844179031364❤‍🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC549 views56 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спойлеры 10 серия (+-) Пока есть время до отключения интернета и разбора компа - рисую Хедканон на то, что Кирилл заключил сделку с тенью и попытался спасти так Даню (взамен дал только часть своего тела, поэтому вернули часть Дани 😞) #абдукция

❤‍🔥3013custom 539550238441790313613

27 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC242 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ЛЮТИК- КАКИЕ 100 ЗВЁЗД 😨😨😨😨😨

14❤‍🔥7custom 53953623555991565803custom 53955023844179031362

27 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC578 views78 reactions100 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

!Спойлеры 10 серия! После просмотра у меня сразу родился в голове концепт: тьма - Кирилл и свет - Даня... Чисто от души артик, несмотря на усталость дикую #абдукция

5016custom 539550238441790313610❤‍🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC436 views49 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В смысле... вас 300??? ПОДОЖДИТЕ, Я ЕЩЁ НЕ ОТОШЛА ОТ 200 БОЛЬШОЕ СПАСИБО?!?! 💥💥💥 Не думала, что вас будет НАСТОЛЬКО много!!! И серия вышла бомбезная и вы подкинули ядерку!!!!! (- эмоционально-социальная батарейка) Зацеловала КАЖДОГО!!!! Готова вечно говорить о том, насколько я благодарна всем вам и насколько хорошие люди тут собрались (вы реально лапули, господи) I hope, что мой скилл будет дальше расти, чтобы вас ра

custom 539550238441790313626137custom 53953623555991565803

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @utkamoty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 283,540 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Утя мотя” (@utkamoty), 324 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/utkamoty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.