меня заебали все сансы на зоне, их слишком дохуя #тейк@ut_dr_zona_pt
💩7❤3👎2🤡2🤮2

Channel
@ut_dr_zona_pt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
149subscribers
+89 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004327429157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ut_dr_zona_pt |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 19 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ut_dr_zona_pt |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:37 | 149 | +10 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:37 | 139 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 138 | +16 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 122 | +35 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 11:54 | 87 | +27 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 60 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:47 | 60 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 45.3% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 9.47% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 6.32% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 5.26% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
меня заебали все сансы на зоне, их слишком дохуя #тейк@ut_dr_zona_pt
💩7❤3👎2🤡2🤮2
Сервер атаковали дримовцы Неанон автомат #тейк@ut_dr_zona_pt
❤4🤯3
🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 Просим любить и жаловать... ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ ❤ ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ confession ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Привет-привет, кадеты и кадеточки! На нашем знаменательном шоу мы покажем вам ЧУДЕСНЫЕ работы, мысли, таланты, картинки наших любимых телезрителей! Так что готовьтесь, друзья, ведь... ❤️🔥…
Posted without readable text
❤4❤🔥2
что за нн на зоне вечно сидят? #тейк@ut_dr_zona_pt
❤9🖕1
а хули кловеров на зоне так много #тейк@ut_dr_zona_pt
❤5❤🔥2
чет зона превратилась в зону сансов
❤3😱3👎1
А вот и копия скина Кетвена. #тейк@ut_dr_zona_pt
🔥3
Здравствуйте, часть зоны Андертейл, Дельтарун и т.д., которая подписана на этот канал! Я хочу сообщить об одном чудаке, который натворил много плохого. (Типа жалобы, да.) Позже будет показан его скин (типа подделки или копии, сделанной Ашеко для этой жалобы). Его псевдоним - Кетвен. • Что же он натворил? Кратко: Кетвен сталкерит автора этой "жалобы", всячески пристаёт и т.д. (Автор "жалобы": "Это сообщение будет НЕ а…
👍3
до меня, невинного дитя джевёрса, сегодня домогались злые дяди стимтоны #тейк@ut_dr_zona_pt
❤5
Хочу немного дополнить тейки о ласте(я не автор тейков) Я более чем уверен, что Ласт сплагиатил скин у этого чела(на более шакальном скрине) И если вам кажется, а че такого в том, что ласт использовал ту же палитру и мол это случайно, то стоит держать в голове, что Ласт когда-то общался с тем Дастом на шакальном скрине и до сих пор до конца не отпустил(в последний раз он объявлялся несколько месяцев назад с угрозами …
😱3
Я не автор тейков про Ласта, но за все эти года накопилось столько дерьма касательно него, что я хочу начать дополнять Давайте я начну кратким сообщением о том, что по последним моим данным, в начале лета Ласт наведовался к своим бывшим, у которых когда-то вымогал интимки, и шантажировался их, угрожая судом При том за тот промежуток он как минимум так подъебался к 4+ людям. С одним из таких человек я общаюсь лично и…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ut_dr_zona_pt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“з𝗈н𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖾/𝖣𝖾𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗎𝗇𝖾 | 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗒 𝗍𝗈𝗐𝗇” (@ut_dr_zona_pt), 149 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ut_dr_zona_pt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.