Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,686–7,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 10:47
7,700
-9
7 Nov 2026, 06:50
7,709
-2
4 Nov 2026, 10:40
7,711
+9
1 Nov 2026, 06:09
7,702
-6
29 Oct 2026, 16:50
7,708
-6
27 Oct 2026, 02:19
7,714
-3
23 Oct 2026, 20:21
7,717
-8
21 Oct 2026, 05:37
7,725
-1
18 Oct 2026, 09:16
7,726
-6
15 Oct 2026, 06:00
7,732
-13
11 Oct 2026, 23:57
7,745
-2
5 Oct 2026, 07:59
7,747
-11
26 Sept 2026, 21:39
7,758
-9
18 Sept 2026, 01:02
7,767
+1
13 Sept 2026, 20:18
7,766
+3
9 Sept 2026, 23:39
7,763
-20
4 Sept 2026, 23:40
7,783
+5
29 Aug 2026, 07:38
7,778
+12
26 Aug 2026, 04:46
7,766
-2
23 Aug 2026, 08:54
7,768
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.99%
avg views ÷ 7,700 subscribers
Avg views / post
461
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
65 (31 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
11,537
Reactions total
465
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,790
Videos
≈1,090
Links
≈1,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 46s
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,793 reactions across 64 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,271
70.9%
🔥
232
12.9%
👍
117
6.53%
😁
98
5.47%
🎉
27
1.51%
🥰
24
1.34%
🤔
12
0.669%
👏
9
0.502%
🤩
3
0.167%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,793 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (32.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Любовь нельзя вытянуть силой
Люди не начинают любить нас сильнее только потому, что мы тяжело стараемся ради них. Можно быть очень удобной. Очень терпеливой и очень понимающей. И даже очень-очень жертвенной. И всё равно не получить той любви, которой так хочется.
Потому что любовь не вытягивают щипцами.
Её невозможно добыть доказательствами:
«посмотри, сколько я для тебя сделала»;
«посмотри, как я старалась»;
«пос…
⚡⚡⚡«Я между двух огней — мужем и взрослым сыном. Как мне быть?»
Прочитала вопрос и поймала себя на чувстве возмущения. Я столько раз приглашала вас на тренинг по эффективному поведению в конфликте. А теперь читаю историю, в которой люди годами живут в противостоянии, теряют силы, здоровье, разрушают отношения и не знают, как из этого выйти.
И знаете, я задумалась: а не испытывает ли сама автор вопроса похожее возму…
Когда я сама размышляла над этим вопросом, мне пришла в голову очень простая мысль.
Вот есть яблоко. У него есть форма, цвет, запах, вкус, плотность. Всё это характеризует яблоко. А возьмём авокадо— у него будут совершенно другие характеристики.
Так вот, для меня женственность — это всё то, через что женщина проявляет себя в мире. Как она выглядит, чувствует, думает, строит отношения, живёт свою женскую жизнь.
Кон…
Приглашаю на прямой эфир в ВК
Тема: «Он перестал пить. Почему семье всё равно тяжело?»
Поговорим о том, почему прекращение употребления алкоголя не всегда сразу приносит в семью облегчение, и что происходит с отношениями после этого.
Эфир проведём вместе с отцом Иоанном Клименко. Диакон Иоанн - ответственный за организацию трезвенной работы на приходах Москвы, кандидат химических наук, автор курсов онлайн занятий …
Рождественский пост уже скоро!
Рождественские письма - прекрасная возможность провести этот пост интересно вместе со своими детьми.
Это 40 писем для детей на каждый день Рождественского поста. Их можно использовать в адвент-календаре или "получать" по почте.
✨Каждое письмо - это интересный текст + задание
✨Письма подходят для детей от 4 до 15 лет
✨Письма именные, адресованы конкретно вашему ребёнку (детям)
✨ Пись…
💥Друзья или я? Отвечаю на вопросы.
Мне кажется, в вашем вопросе две разные проблемы. И важно их разделить.
☑️Первая — муж не умеет отказывать другим.
Возможно, Вы его жалеете, потому что считаете, что друзья пользуются его добротой. И одновременно злитесь: почему взрослый мужчина не может сказать «нет»?
Здесь легко оказаться в треугольнике Карпмана: муж — жертва, друзья — преследователи, Вы — спасатель.
Но счита…
Хочется больше понимания в семье и меньше разговоров, которые заканчиваются обидой?💕🫂💞
Умение сказать о важном, услышать другого, обсудить разногласия и договориться может многое изменить в повседневном общении.
Именно этому посвящён тренинг «Эффективное поведение в конфликте». Будем замечать привычные реакции и пробовать общаться иначе через ролевые диалоги, игры и арт-терапевтические упражнения.
В субботней гру…
⁉️«Я грешнее всех». Это смирение или низкая самооценка?
Есть слова в православных молитвах, которые могут вызывать у человека недоумение. «От нихже первый есмь аз».
То есть: «Из грешников я первый».
Эти слова мы произносим в молитве перед Святым Причащением. Они восходят к словам апостола Павла (1 Тим. 1:15). И я хочу сегодня поговорить об одной тонкой теме.
Что значит считать себя самым грешным? Не означает ли эт…
❤17
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @usovapsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@usovapsy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 November 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Умеете ли вы договариваться?
Договориться — это не значит уступить. И не значит убедить другого сделать по-вашему. Это способность найти решение, в котором услышаны оба человека.
✔️Если наши желания не совпадают, я могу спокойно сказать, чего хочу, и выслушать его(её) позицию.65%
✔️Если супруг(а) предлагает то, что мне не нравится, я сначала пойму, почему это важно для него(неё)38%
✔️ Во время спора я могу изменить своё мнение, если понимаю, что аргументы другого человека разумны76%
✔️Если не приходим к общему решению,можем не продолжать разговор. Я предложу вернуться к нему позже29%
✔️Я могу согласиться на компромисс, даже если в результате получу не всё, чего хотела(ел).65%
✔️Если мне пришлось уступить, я не припоминаю это супругу(е) при следующем конфликте.41%
✔️Я могу прямо сказать: «Мне это не подходит. Давай подумаем, какой ещё вариант устроит нас обоих»59%
✔️Если вопрос для супруга(и)значительно важнее,чем для меня, буду это учитывать при принятии решения62%
✔️Мы договорились, но я понимаю, что мне не подходит решение, я снова подниму вопрос56%
✔️После сложного разговора не ищу виноватого, а стараюсь понять, есть ли решение для двоих41%
The shares total 532%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Православный психолог | Никита Сергеевич Яночкин @yanochkin_psiholog · 17,093 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
Священник Никита Горбик @otec_nikita · 24,695 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
Молитва о семье @molitva_o_semje · 22,288 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Мотивации от Берегового 🎯 @beregovoymotimotivation · 21,474 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 September 2026
Алина Бабкина @alinababkinatg · 22,500 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
Священник Владислав Береговой @pravoslavieVtelege · 97,433 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
🍏ПРОСТО.ПОСТНО🍏 постные рецепты @prostopostno_natalia · 53,041 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Господи Иисусе Христе, Сыне Божий, помилуй мя... @ICXC_pravoslavie · 19,529 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 September 2026
Виктория Макарская. Бабсовет @makarskayababsovet · 228,654 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Матушка Екатерина Муравьева | православие, Петербург, рецепты @katherinemuraveva · 18,774 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
Что-то личное @chto_to_li4noe · 27,464 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Николай Бабкин | cвященник, клинический психолог @nickolaybabkin · 57,413 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Игумен Нектарий (Морозов) @igumennektariy · 25,790 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
СВЯЩЕННИК НИКОЛАЙ ДУБИНИН. Белгородская Митрополия. @otecnikolay_d · 43,519 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Православие и дети @pravoslavie_i_deti · 56,641 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Православная психология @orthodoxpsiholog · 73,300 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
ПП - Православное Питание @pravrecept · 23,139 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Otche.pro @otchepro0 · 21,769 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
oliv'едка | дом·уют·рецепты 🤍 @olivedka · 28,270 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
ДОБРОДЕТЕЛЬНАЯ ЖЕНА @dobrodetelnaya_zhena · 23,023 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
SALOMEYA @ElenaSalomeya · 19,298 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 October 2026
Канал о. Саввы Мажуко @savvamazhuko · 29,597 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
@tatiana_paris @tatiana_paris · 22,398 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Сергей Комаров @komarov_mission · 19,476 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Усоварядом” (@usovapsy), 7,700 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usovapsy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.