№ 4801166051
ИНН 582102494565
Матушка Татьяна Добролюбова - христианка, женщина, жена, мама, хозяйка🌸
Учусь быть добродетельной женой
Я в Максе https://max.ru/dobrodetelnaya_zhena
PR @ZarinaDanina
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -740. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,936–23,898 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 19:57
23,047
-4
5 Nov 2026, 18:40
23,051
-13
4 Nov 2026, 16:36
23,064
-10
3 Nov 2026, 14:59
23,074
-8
2 Nov 2026, 12:54
23,082
-2
1 Nov 2026, 15:27
23,084
-4
31 Oct 2026, 16:49
23,088
-5
30 Oct 2026, 13:39
23,093
-7
29 Oct 2026, 11:48
23,100
-3
28 Oct 2026, 12:00
23,103
-6
27 Oct 2026, 12:35
23,109
-4
26 Oct 2026, 09:36
23,113
-7
25 Oct 2026, 06:11
23,120
-7
24 Oct 2026, 05:11
23,127
-8
23 Oct 2026, 02:48
23,135
-8
21 Oct 2026, 23:05
23,143
-11
20 Oct 2026, 16:09
23,154
-3
19 Oct 2026, 17:08
23,157
-11
18 Oct 2026, 13:59
23,168
-7
17 Oct 2026, 14:17
23,175
first reading
Engagement
246 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.80%
avg views ÷ 23,047 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 246 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
246 (6 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
78,493
Reactions total
9,340
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 14:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,880
Videos
≈2,470
Links
≈228
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 46m
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 94 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
33,097 reactions across 245 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
17,149
51.8%
🙏
12,643
38.2%
👍
1,002
3.03%
🥰
606
1.83%
🔥
544
1.64%
😁
451
1.36%
🕊
215
0.65%
🤣
95
0.287%
😍
69
0.208%
👏
66
0.199%
😢
60
0.181%
❤🔥
53
0.16%
💯
29
0.088%
💔
24
0.073%
🍓
21
0.063%
😇
11
0.033%
👀
10
0.03%
💘
9
0.027%
🤔
7
0.021%
🎉
6
0.018%
9 further kinds
27
0.082%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 245 of the 246 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,097 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 246 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 71 posts held from the last 30 days (2.82%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Приезжала скорая😢съемки отменила
Мне, конечно, очень жаль, что так вышло. Может, потому, что два таких серьезных волнительных события в один день - это как-то многовато))
Сделали укол, дали таблетку. Стало лучше, но не сильно(( лежу
Не знаю, как на концерт поеду 🙈
🔴Лития по усопшему (для самостоятельного чтения дома)
Это как бы мини-молебен о усопшем, который может совершать не только священник, потому что я взяла вариант, написанный специально для чтения мирянами.
Записала видео в удобном для вас формате, наглядно показывая рукой, как петь. Когда решите помолиться о упокоении, можете включать меня и просто петь вместе со мной🙏🏻
В конце можно добавить самостоятельн…
❗️Родные, нужна ваша срочная молитвенная помощь🙏🏻
Сейчас я должна была поехать на съемки, но у меня так болит голова, что я не могу встать с постели. Сразу начинает подташнивать от боли. Горсть таблеток уж выпила. Но пока не особо что-то изменилось.
Возможно, это искушение. Потому что я должна была рассказывать о чудесах. А рассказы о чудесах всегда очень раздражают врага рода человеческого.
Лежу и молюсь:…
Доброе утро, дорогие!
Сегодня Димитриевска родительская суббота — день особой молитвы о наших усопших. Помянем родных и всех, кого уже нет рядом: попросим у Господа прощения им и упокоения, а нам — памяти смертной и мира в сердце
Царствие Небесное всем усопшим. Помоги нам, Господи, прожить этот день тихо и с молитвой🙏🏻
Давайте по нашей с вами уже сложившейся прекрасной доброй традиции помолимся в комментари…
Девочки, помогайте 😁
Выбираю платье на концерт Полины Гагариной — и никак не решу!
Показываю три варианта. Какое бы вы выбрали: 1, 2 или 3? 🤍
Напишите, пока я ещё не сложила все три в сумку))
Собрались с Эмилией в садик, вышли, а у нас… первый снег! ❄️
Правда, почти сразу превратился обратно в дождь 😅 И обязательно ещё будет день, когда выпадет другой снег…
И мы снова назовём его первым 😁
Но Эмилия уже успела попробовать этот на вкус 😅 Так что первый снег засчитан! 🤍
«Родители должны быть такими, какими они хотят видеть своих детей – не на словах, а на деле».
«Главным центром жизни любого человека должен быть его дом. Это место, где растут дети – растут физически, укрепляют свое здоровье и впитывают в себя все, что сделает их истинными и благородными мужчинами и женщинами.
Любимая императрица Александра❤️что не цитата, то поражает меня своей мудростью, простотой и чистотой…
Почему я хочу подарить
Полине Гагариной именно икону
«Нечаянная Радость»? 🤍
Для нашей семьи это особенный образ. С ним связаны две истории, которые я бережно храню в сердце.
Первая — наша Дашенька.
После рождения старшей дочки у нас долго не было детей. Мы ждали, надеялись и молились перед иконой Божией Матери «Нечаянная Радость». Просили о малыше.
И наша молитва была услышана. У нас родилась Дашенька — …
Папа вернулся с богослужения, а Эмилия сразу устроилась рядом, обняла его и сказала:
- Папа, от тебя пахнет Причастием🤍
Вот так обнимаешь папу и говоришь слова, которые маме хочется запомнить навсегда…
Мы собираемся в Москву на концерт Полины Гагариной! Для новых подписчиков коротко расскажу, как всё случилось))
Я давно хотела сводить старших девчонок на её концерт в Пензе, но каждый раз он приходился на Великий пост. И вообще, как-то так повелось, что все известные певцы в основном едут в марте) В этом году концерт был запланирован на февраль, до поста, и я заранее купила билеты. Но потом его перенесли на перву…
❤102🙏44
Showing the 12 most recent of 246 posts we hold for @dobrodetelnaya_zhena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Проголосуйте, пожалуйста🙏🏻
Нужен ли вам УСПЕНСКИЙ КУРС?
Да, пойду64%
Нет, не пойду10%
Пока не знаю..27%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 246 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Открытая группа Татьяны Ельфимовой @tetiana_elfimova · 36,695 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
Сестра во Христе 🕊️ @byankinastya · 18,909 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 October 2026
Молитва о семье @molitva_o_semje · 22,289 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Постимся всей семьёй 👨👩👧👦 @postimsya_vsei_semyoi · 22,486 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Священник Илья Савастьянов @savastyanov_i · 27,978 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
mom_lena @mom_lena_channel · 21,941 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Георгиевский храм @georghram · 33,294 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДОБРОДЕТЕЛЬНАЯ ЖЕНА” (@dobrodetelnaya_zhena), 23,047 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dobrodetelnaya_zhena.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.