Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кастинг-Директор и Гедонист - Анастасия Усова

@usova_cast

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13,469subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001871501921
TypeChannel
Username@usova_cast
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/usova_cast

Growth

13,42313,46913,4467 August 2026 — 13,424 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,424 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,432 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,423 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,435 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,448 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,452 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,461 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,469 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,416–13,476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:3613,469+8
13 Aug 2026, 04:3513,461+9
12 Aug 2026, 07:4513,452+4
11 Aug 2026, 06:4713,448+13
10 Aug 2026, 03:3113,435+12
9 Aug 2026, 05:5713,423-9
8 Aug 2026, 04:2213,432+8
7 Aug 2026, 04:3613,424no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:0113,424first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 13,469 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held27 (13 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total54,980
Reactions total892
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,268 reactions across 22 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
60147.4%
🔥19515.4%
👍1239.70%
❤‍🔥806.31%
😁645.05%
🤝584.57%
🙏211.66%
🤔201.58%
🥰161.26%
💯151.18%
🤩131.03%
💔110.868%
🤗110.868%
🤣90.71%
🍾70.552%
👌60.473%
👏60.473%
🤷40.315%
30.237%
🏆30.237%
2 further kinds20.158%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @usova_cast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,320 views96 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо всем, кто откликнулся на мой опрос. Честно говоря, я с трепетом смотрела на эти цифры. Мы всегда думаем, что "у всех всё получается, кроме меня", а тут, живой срез нашей общей актёрской реальности. Итак, как же выглядит наш сезон съемок 2026 (пока что)? 🎬 6% - в огне съемок (держитесь, герои!) 🧘‍♀️ 33% - тишина, но я в ресурсе (золотая выдержка!) 🎭 9% - ушли в смежку (вы всё ещё в искусстве!) 🎢 29% - то гус

56❤‍🔥21💔7🤝5🤗3👍2😁2

13 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTCviews —

Кастинг-Директор и Гедонист - Анастасия Усова pinned a photo

12 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,720 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ ИНТЕНСИВ "САМОПРОБЫ ОТ А ДО Я" 0% теории и 100 практики от Ярослава Штефана на 5-часовом тренинге для актеров кино. Интенсивная практика по 5-ти предметам: 1️⃣ Самопробы: разбор реальных примеров и отработка элементов актерского мастерства для работы в сцене в пробе. 2️⃣ Этюды на оценку: практическое освоение техники проживания оценки и оценочного ряда на разных планах в работе на камеру; 3️⃣ Техника

11👍4😁4🤔3🏆1🔥1🤣1

11 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,100 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Мне как кастинг-директору жутко интересно, какой тренд сейчас преобладает. Поставьте только ОДИН смайл, который описывает ваш сезон 2026🙂 Поехали! 👇

  1. 🔥 Огонь! Снимаюсь нон-стоп, нет времени даже выпить кофе.7%
  2. 🌱 Тишина, но я в ресурсе: учусь, качаю анкеты, жду осенних сдвигов.33%
  3. 💸 Ушел в смежную профессию (озвучка, дубляж, педагогика), кино пока мимо.9%
  4. 🤡 Сезон странный: то густо, то пусто. В июле было три проекта, в августе пока штиль.29%
  5. 👀 Ничего не происходит, просто жду ответа от кастинг-директора (привет, это я!).17%
  6. Как обычно, если есть что добавить - пишите в комментариях 🙂4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥7❤‍🔥5🙏43

11 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈2,080 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💬 ВОТ ПОЧЕМУ НОВИЧКОВ БЕРУТ ЧАЩЕ, ЧЕМ ОПЫТНЫХ Осень — сезон, когда проектов в разы больше, а лиц всё ещё не хватает. Заходить в индустрию проще именно сейчас, пока конкуренция не выросла. С приглашённым экспертом разберём: 🔋 Как собрать рабочее портфолио без студийной съёмки за 40 000 ₽ 🔋 Как справиться с зажимом перед камерой за несколько минут до кастинга 🔋 В чём разница между модельным и актёрским кастингом — и

👍43🤔2🤣2😁2🏆1custom 53596788395910186931

8 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈2,780 views102 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Немногого о моей работе… Третий день идет читка сценария, вся группа в Питере, ну и я от них не отстаю, пытаюсь заодно ухватить лето за хвост 🙂

🔥4826👍15😁11🤩2

8 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,570 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

23👍6🤝5🙏3🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈3,460 views56 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ищем главных героев. 🚨 Съемки в Минске‼️ Ориентировочный период с 25 августа по 10 октября. Нужны актеры, максимально свободные в указанный календарный период‼️ 💡АННА – 35 лет, главный бухгалтер торговой фирмы, самостоятельная, практичная и упрямая женщина, привыкшая рассчитывать исключительно на свои силы, поскольку отец её дочери Лизы давно устранился от воспитания, и вся ответственность за ребёнка лежит полно

37👍16🤝3

5 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC≈2,970 views146 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо всем, кто откликнулся в опросе. Я всех вижу и запоминаю🙂 На самом деле, это был такой тихий способ понять кое-что важное. Посчитать не цифры, а присутствие. Почувствовать, кто здесь. Потому что скоро начнётся кое-что большое. И происходить это будет в Питере. 🎬 Да, тот самый проект, о котором я уже писала ранее, всё ближе. Пока не могу рассказать всего, но знаю точно: искать людей я буду не только в Москве

75🔥32❤‍🔥10🙏9🍾7👍7🥰2😁2

4 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC≈3,190 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Решила обновить карту подписчиков. Кто вы по географической душе?

  1. МСК69%
  2. СПб25%
  3. Регионы РФ11%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC≈4,220 views44 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Давно не делилась с вами своими просмотрами, а ведь это моя рабочая стихия и моя страсть. Тем более впереди выходные ( я знаю, что у кого-то они бывают🙂) Я смотрю всё: и наше, и зарубежное, и делаю это не только потому что надо быть в тонусе, но и потому что безумно люблю наблюдать за актёрской игрой в разных оптиках. В этот раз решила нарушить свои же правила и залезла в жанр, который обычно обхожу стороной. Я н

19👍10❤‍🔥7🤝5🙏2🤩1

29 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC≈3,940 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

20👍10🔥7😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @usova_cast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@usova_cast edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTCAnonymous Poll507 voters

Мне как кастинг-директору жутко интересно, какой тренд сейчас преобладает. Поставьте только ОДИН смайл, который описывает ваш сезон 2026🙂 Поехали! 👇

  1. 🔥 Огонь! Снимаюсь нон-стоп, нет времени даже выпить кофе.7%
  2. 🌱 Тишина, но я в ресурсе: учусь, качаю анкеты, жду осенних сдвигов.33%
  3. 💸 Ушел в смежную профессию (озвучка, дубляж, педагогика), кино пока мимо.9%
  4. 🤡 Сезон странный: то густо, то пусто. В июле было три проекта, в августе пока штиль.29%
  5. 👀 Ничего не происходит, просто жду ответа от кастинг-директора (привет, это я!).17%
  6. Как обычно, если есть что добавить - пишите в комментариях 🙂4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTCAnonymous Poll884 voters

Решила обновить карту подписчиков. Кто вы по географической душе?

  1. МСК69%
  2. СПб25%
  3. Регионы РФ11%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTCAnonymous Poll184 voters

Выберите идеальные для вас день и время, чтобы мы назначили дату общего эфира/созвона.

  1. Понедельник34%
  2. Среда35%
  3. Днем после 15.0043%
  4. Вечером после 18.0051%

The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 885,857 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кастинг-Директор и Гедонист - Анастасия Усова” (@usova_cast), 13,469 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usova_cast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.