Channel
@usnxergaf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001192045254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @usnxergaf |
| Description | personal contact @xergaf [BA] |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 27 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/usnxergaf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 28 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 28 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 27 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Klarifikasi, Orang yang keep hyyunjin akhirnya balikin usnnya kesaya. Sudah pindah owner dan sekarang usnnya saya pakai. Terimakasih bagi semua yang sudah mau bantu untuk fwin hal ini, hingga membuat owner yang keep hyyunjin berubah pikiran untuk balikin usnnya pada saya. Bagi yang sudah bantu fwin hyyunjin untuk report boleh tolong dihapus saja ya dan tidak perlu di report lagi usnnya. -xergaf
HELP FW. Tolong report @hyyunjin karena yang keep ngga mau balikin ke saya dan proof yang dia kasih keep 16 mei itu bohong (tidak benar), dia juga banyak alasan yang tidak masuk akal agar usnnya tidak dibalikin ke saya. Tolong siapapun untuk banned username ini dan jangan dibeli, report channel @hyyunjin. Untuk @manlys yang keep username saya, semoga kamu buka mata dan pikiran ya. Saya sudah berusaha berdiskusi deng…
Kalo lewat info create ch mah saya juga bisa taruh usn yang baru saya keep hari ini ke ch yang dibuat di tahun lalu, setelah itu saya akuinnya udah punya usn itu dari lama wkwk
Ini buktinya saya ss tanggal 28 mei 2022, minggu ini juga saya masih cek usn @hyyunjin masih punya saya nih
Dibilangnya tanggal 16mei create. Tapi buktinya saya tanggal 28mei masih ss ch lama @Hyyunjin dan infonya masih punya saya wwkwk
cuma mau ngasih tau aja kalau saya sudah keep ini dari tanggal 16 mei, berarti sudah 3 minggu tapi kenapa sudah 3 minggu baru di tagih? kalau benar" punya kamu seharusnya kamu tungguin dong, lagian kamu bilangnya dari ch yang ke deak, pertayaannya sejak kapan ch bisa ke deak?, kalu semisal ke tfo random si bisa aja bisa saja ke tfo random lalu org yang ke tfo random itu deak, berarti itu bukan salah saya dong? lagia…
Sedih dah usn @juyeonk dan @hyyunjin gua gamau dibalikin sama yang keep
wts @yohans sold cp : @xergaf
wts @younghoon sold @yohans cp @xergaf
ufs @yomunghoon sold cp @xergaf
ufs @younsghoon sold cp @xergaf @xergaffff
berlaku sehari aja.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @usnxergaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,038,639 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@usnxergaf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“usn xergaf” (@usnxergaf), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usnxergaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.