Channel
@urumbul
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
112subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003707539954 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @urumbul |
| Description | connect @blrutal |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/urumbul |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 112 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 112 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 61.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 38.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20260407101214377315010300166050673503640 | 1 | 7 April 2026 | 7 April 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 7 April 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
terimakasih ya sudah ikut GA🤍 kapan" lagi Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=sv88keaqe&r=ehmxoj&orderId=20260407101214377315010300166050673503640
❤1
sudah ku text yaa, cek rc
3⃣lagi sini comment
text me @blrutal, batas pengambilan jam besok jam 6 pagi wib nanti. ty
https://t.me/keecer/6?comment=197 https://t.me/keecer/6?single&comment=352 https://t.me/keecer/6?single&comment=358
❤2
https://t.me/keecer/6?comment=174 https://t.me/keecer/6?comment=417 https://t.me/keecer/6?single&comment=436
text me @blrutal, batas pengambilan jam 8 wib nanti. ty
https://t.me/keecer/6?single&comment=247
https://t.me/keecer/6?comment=10 https://t.me/keecer/6?single&comment=327 .. https://t.me/keecer/6?single&comment=76 https://t.me/keecer/6?comment=185 https://t.me/keecer/6?single&comment=229 https://t.me/keecer/6?comment=309 https://t.me/keecer/6?single&comment=214 ..
ini sisa cc,noktel 1,gift, & stars 50s 1 aku drop jam set 2, yg waktu itu blm sempat terbalas ya. abis selesai aku spin sisa nya. setelah spin selesai, batas pengambilan sampai jam 8 wib nanti.. selebihnya bakal dibagikan secara acak jika tidak ada yg ambil
sorry ya guys, sampe tgl 4 masih bz...
ini yg belum udah gugur ya soalnya dah lewat 24jam, sisanya ntar di spin
🔥5❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @urumbul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 568,962 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“toko berkah pinggir jalan” (@urumbul), 112 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urumbul.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.