Channel
@urliveyn_russia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003152650248 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @urliveyn_russia |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/urliveyn_russia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 30 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 30 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 325 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Сейчас Ауюми является моим основным детищем и хобби, в который я погружен с головой. Понятное дело, можно было бы вкладываться в какой-то Minecraft сервер или делать ролики на ютуб, но это лично для меня мега скучная и убыточная история, да и в них нет такого простора реализации своих идей, есть потолок, а сейчас - потолок только идеи, ресурсы, деньги. Их можно прибавить, можно убавить, а потолка в этой сфере всё рав…
Я реально горд тем, что сейчас получается вплане безопасности данных и сети в Ауюми. Мы используем топовые IT решения и запускаем у себя сервисы, которыми пользуются крупные мега-компании. Конечно, невозможно говорить, что эта инфраструктура полностью безопасна, уникальна и проверена на всех плоскостях, именно по этому я всегда всем и говорю, что Ауюми выйдет явно сырым и буквально будет пробой пера. Хочу упомянуть -…
🦋 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🦫 нач: 200★/200 робуксов мин: 15★/15 робуксов авто:500★/500 робуксов 😛Правила: 😑:- не присваивать авторство себе 😘:- не ставить свои правила 😨:- без возрата 😆:- Конец через 48ч (по мск) после последней ставки (или после обмена) ❤️ Победитель получит PNG без водяного знака ❤️ ------------ Можно обменять этого адопта ------------ Анонка 🥹 тгк 🥹 лс #а
Тут моя фанатка делает свой дебьют, вхвхв Кароче, Венричка делает дебьют своей 3д модельки с фулл трекингом тела, можете зайти к ней на стрим, кому интересно! Очень крутая и уникальная витуберша с выдающейся подачей, иногда к ней захожу на стримы, а она всегда поднимает мне настроение
Posted without readable text
Video, posted without a caption
Чуваки, когда в Ауюми зарегаете аккаунт, пж продайте никнейм nextgen, оч надо 🥹🥹 + Можете написать в коммы к посту, если захотите освещать любые новости по Ауюми или строить теории по функционалу. P.s; Для этого будет канал @neswex, где буквально будет все спойлеры и новости до выхода Ауюми только об Ауюми
Ой, а че с комментами
Ваще заметили, как Kari себе лого обновили?? У меня кстати оттуда теперь крутые кросы 🙂
Блин блинский тут просто так много простых прикольных ребяток, с которыми даже я мб хочу простт поболтать кстати хай там Венривв и друзья Неникади ✌✌ Но щас так ушёл в работу над Аую; что даже это могу потерять, видимо время реальн перестраиваться и постить не какую-то дрянь, а может что-то нормальное
Всем хай! Как всегда у меня на канале накрученные подписоты, потом видимо придётся откручивать сидеть 🫡🫡 Вообще хочется правда как-то сделать ситуацию канала лучше в плане постов и тд, сам вижу, что актив и ваш в первую очередь интерес полностью пропал, но что именно делать - это уже мне нужно подумать (а идей... 0) Можно же тут буллщит постить?? Не против просто постов про жизнь и тд?? Любите стримы по играм каким …
Конечно. Мини юрлик 🥹
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @urliveyn_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 904,004 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юрли Вейн” (@urliveyn_russia), 30 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urliveyn_russia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.