Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

URBS+TOPIA

@urbstopia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

155subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002555199231
TypeChannel
Username@urbstopia
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/urbstopia

Growth

154155154.56 August 2026 — 154 subscribers8 August 2026 — 154 subscribers13 August 2026 — 155 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 154–155 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:38155+1
8 Aug 2026, 18:46154no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:19154first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
93.5%
avg views ÷ 155 subscribers
Avg views / post
145
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held7 (5 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total580
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2152.5%
🔥1845.0%
💔12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC61 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#снимки #торонто Фотографировала недавно открытие маленького муниципального парка, который мы спроектировали.

11🔥1

18 Jul 2026, 23:53 UTC207 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И тут, собственно, я перехожу к вопросам, которые возникли у меня по итогу прочтения этой статьи. А что они будут делать с долгами? В США столько лет мусолили тему прощения долгов за оплату обучения, потому что это камень на шее низшего и ниже среднего класса, но в итоге простили долги лишь частично, и их всё ещё надо выплачивать, система не меняется (только усложняют доступ к скидкам). А ипотека? Куда она денется,

10

18 Jul 2026, 23:52 UTC160 viewsread 8 August 2026

В статье приводятся стратегии, которые предлагаются экономистами для решения грядущего кризиса, и которые уже сейчас разными гос-вами внедряются: 1. Всеобщий налог на потребление в качестве первоочередной меры для поддержания бюджетов государств до тех пор, пока не будут внедрены более устойчивые механизмы — особенно в случае, если человеческий труд в массе своей исчезнет. Даже если разбогатевшие на ИИ магнаты стану

18 Jul 2026, 23:52 UTC152 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В Блумберге вышла статья о мрачном будущем, в котором из-за сокращения рабочих мест, вызванного ИИ, государства столкнутся с падением дохода от налогообложения физических лиц: то есть подоходного налога. Как и в эпоху промышленной революции проблема сводится не к технологии, замещающей труд, а к тому, что государства и люди не успевают адаптироваться к резким и очень быстрым переменам. То есть новые профессии и сфер

💔1

3 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC159 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @elooopPhoto

Осторожно, он герой Белорус прошёл 619 036 шагов за месяц и стал туалетным сомелье, чтобы сделать карту общедоступных туалетов в Минске. Идея пришла ему в голову, когда он «лазил в мусорке в поисках чека из Макдака с паролем от туалета». Туалетный сомелье навайбкодил сервис «Кабинка» и сам наполнил его данными: «Норматив был 10-15 туалетов в день. За месяц прогулок посетил почти 400 туалетов и нагулял 619 000 шаго

🔥10

3 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC123 viewsread 8 August 2026

Вот что такое настоящий урбанизм⬇️⬇️⬇️

5 Jun 2026, 00:22 UTC192 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Последнее, что хочу добавить про InZoi, это абсолютно сумасшедшие опции редактирования города, где, помимо смены растений и добавления светлячков и фейерверков, можно устроить грязный сайлент хилл и наводнить его крокодилами. Я не понимаю... но я в восторге. П.С.: ещё я нашла как угнать машину, сбила человека и попала на один день в тюрьму — там полноценный геймплэй, вплоть до того, что можно шить наволочки и смотре

🔥7

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @urbstopia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 846,236 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“URBS+TOPIA” (@urbstopia), 155 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urbstopia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.