Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Урбекистония

Channel

Урбекистония

@urbekistan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

426subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003802302219
TypeChannel
Username@urbekistan
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/urbekistan

Growth

417426421.57 August 2026 — 417 subscribers7 August 2026 — 419 subscribers16 August 2026 — 426 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 416–427 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:03426+7
7 Aug 2026, 16:03419+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:17417first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
173.5%
avg views ÷ 426 subscribers
Avg views / post
739
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held7 (19 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total4,435
Reactions total744
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

744 reactions across 6 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
37350.1%
🥰7510.1%
custom 5431736721391759227547.26%
456.05%
💘314.17%
custom 5267390446350386137233.09%
custom 5188365040968808895222.96%
🍓212.82%
👾182.42%
👀152.02%
🔥131.75%
❤‍🔥111.48%
custom 533037773517908572681.08%
custom 540930660687571679381.08%
👻60.806%
custom 533279062203618705840.538%
custom 536399420368670735640.538%
custom 543153409771963673440.538%
custom 533496212743627551230.403%
🌭30.403%
1 further kind30.403%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 744reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @urbekistan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC275 views159 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ура в Урбекистонии уже 400 водолазов!!! Поздравляем!!! Вот вам угольный заводик (не продается, но можете заказать тонну щебня)

100custom 543173672139175922725custom 526739044635038613713💘6custom 51883650409688088955🍓3custom 53327906220361870582custom 53349621274362755122

Signed ALANNOCHK!!!

27 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC589 views171 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скоро будет супер насыщенный дроп🎧😎

114💘19🍓14custom 51883650409688088957custom 52673904463503861375custom 54317367213917592274custom 54093066068757167933custom 53303777351790857262

Signed Ceriertone

23 Jul 2026, 23:29 UTC791 views141 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Планы на день: 1. Найти формулу своего вонючего одеколона 2. Купить шапку 3. Посетить так называемый наход

🥰7024custom 543173672139175922723🔥6custom 52673904463503861374🍓3💘3custom 53303777351790857263

Signed Ceriertone

19 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,110 views109 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

а моя первая любофф началась с Мегатонны! 😊 фоточки оттуда... R.I.P 💔 (Вы могли видеть грустные мемы про нее у Цери в канале, потому что на данный момент все что вы видите на фотографиях более не существует в нашей реальности) Мне и раньше очень нравились заброшенные места, но я была скорее сторонним, завороженным этим зрелищем наблюдалой. А потом мы, в один погожий денек, гуляя вместе, увидели ее и решили совершить

67👀13custom 51883650409688088958👻6👾4custom 54315340977196367344custom 54093066068757167932custom 54317367213917592272

Signed ALANNOCHK!!!

19 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC814 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ура, 100 подписчиков! Разыгрываем бутерброд, результаты в следующем году

48👾11🔥6🥰3💘2🍓1😈1custom 52673904463503861371

Signed Ceriertone

19 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC856 views90 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто-то спрашивал в комментариях, откуда у меня тяга к заброшенным зданиям и что было первым. Что было первым я понятия не имею, ведь заброшенные разваелины всегда были частью моей жизни, будь то заброшенный вертолет с гнездом ос или разваленное предприятие за кирпичным забором. Основным же спусковым крючком для самого последнего фикса (и самого яркого) был поход в катакомбы и заброшенный горелый особняк в 2023 году

4320❤‍🔥11custom 53639942036867073564🌭2👀2👾2custom 53303777351790857262

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @urbekistan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 177,943 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Урбекистония” (@urbekistan), 426 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urbekistan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.