Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Uragan

Channel

Uragan

@uragan_tonn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

194subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002378185304
TypeChannel
Username@uragan_tonn
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/uragan_tonn

Growth

1941961957 August 2026 — 196 subscribers8 August 2026 — 196 subscribers16 August 2026 — 194 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 194–196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:16194-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:45196no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:59196first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍266.7%
😁133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2025 to 17 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 May 2025, 13:48 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Leksonton

https://t.me/tontrade?start=OygsZI5-ty в холд

Signed i

26 May 2025, 19:21 UTC134 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Leksonton

Ладно что-то скучно Делаем мини конкурс Рандомный комментарий получит от меня 3 тона, итоги завтра в 12:00 @Leks / @TonTradingbot

Signed i

23 May 2025, 08:08 UTC119 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeksontonPhoto

https://tonfor.pro/gifts пользуйтесь @Leks / @TonTradingbot

Signed Gletcher BIO

19 May 2025, 12:55 UTC88 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeksontonPhoto

теперь видосы у смеркиса только такие 😎 @Leks / @TonTradingbot

Signed i

19 May 2025, 04:31 UTC74 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Leksonton

1 тон Участников: 7 Призовых мест: 5 Дата розыгрыша: 22:00, 20.05.2025 MSK (2 дня)

Signed Gletcher BIO

17 May 2025, 18:12 UTC63 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeksontonPhoto

Blum - все? пост взял у @rub1kub @Leks / @TonTradingbot

Signed Gletcher BIO

17 May 2025, 13:29 UTC71 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeksontonPhoto

Snoop Dog зарегался в тг https://t.me/snoopdogg старый токен продолжает лететь на фоне этой новости https://t.me/tontrade?start=4Mm5RwIpBq @Leks / @TonTradingbot

Signed i

16 May 2025, 14:49 UTC70 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Leksonton

https://t.me/tontrade?start=HCeQwKgtSg https://t.me/dtrade?start=883994951_EQBZ1yu-rK7-2Oae_gcQKb2wqw4HFBgrbp35NZjQM8UsLpgM мб ниже упадет изза паники, смотрите сами, так то можно взять в холд @Leks / @TonTradingbot

Signed Gletcher BIO

15 May 2025, 19:41 UTC81 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeksontonPhoto

📣 Фаундер @blum уходит из криптовалюты и вкладывается в LEGO @Leks / @TonTradingbot

👍2

Signed Gletcher BIO

14 May 2025, 12:11 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Leksonton

Dtrade наконец-то полностью запустили трейд бот, заходим и тестим

Signed Gletcher BIO

13 May 2025, 18:35 UTC68 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Leksonton

MRKT не забудьте подключить кошельки, обещают насыпать ранним пользователям @Leks / @TonTradingbot

Signed i

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uragan_tonn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 May 2025, 18:39 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

хочу запустить проект с 5 тон до 500 тон, как вы относитесь к этому?

  1. будет очень интересно, сам нахожусь в такой ситуации44%
  2. не интересно42%
  3. 50/5014%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2025 to 17 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Uragan” (@uragan_tonn), 194 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uragan_tonn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.