Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сусанна Ураева | uraeva.online

Channel

Сусанна Ураева | uraeva.online

@uraeva_online

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

689subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001844142904
TypeChannel
Username@uraeva_online
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/uraeva_online

Growth

689690689.58 August 2026 — 690 subscribers8 August 2026 — 690 subscribers15 August 2026 — 689 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 689–690 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:37689-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:20690no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:02690first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

414 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14635.3%
11728.3%
👍4711.4%
😁317.49%
👏184.35%
❤‍🔥92.17%
🎉92.17%
🤔71.69%
🤩71.69%
💯51.21%
😱51.21%
👌40.966%
😍30.725%
🤣30.725%
👻10.242%
😢10.242%
🤗10.242%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2024 to 5 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uraeva_online. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 October 2024 to 5 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2025, 06:16 UTC≈1,600 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍒 Кэшбек «Ягодки» на WB: Мы дождались! Наконец-то и у Вб появился свой кэшбек. Признаться, интересно сравнить, будет ли инструмент отрабатывать лучше, чем «баллы за отзывы», или инструменты органично дополнят друг друга. Как работает система? 📌 Выставляете кэшбек 0-25% на товары 📌 Бонусы покупателю начисляются только при оплате через WB Кошелёк 📌 Начисление происходит через 14 дней после выкупа (защита от фрода) 📌

🔥52👍2👏1

Signed Susanna Uraeva

31 Jul 2025, 06:26 UTC≈1,200 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Считать или не считать: зачем нужен трекинг задач? В агентстве у меня в управлении было несколько команд, одна из которых занималась контентом. Каждый день они: 🔹 Создавали и оформляли магазины (да, даже при стандартном интерфейсе там хватало подводных камней); 🔹 Готовили карточки товаров — от базовых характеристик до rich-контента; 🔹 Организовывали поставки (чтобы всё загружалось без ошибок). Казалось бы — всё по

🔥304🤩1

Signed Susanna Uraeva

24 Jul 2025, 06:26 UTC≈1,270 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

3 модных фреймворка обратной связи, которые только кажутся эффективными 🚫 Да, я вернулась! 👀 После перерыва — сразу в бой с темой, которая бесит всех: как НЕ надо давать обратную связь. Корпоративный мир обожает красивые модели фидбека. Но 80% из них — просто «пустышки» 😤. Разберём ТОП-3, которые выглядят логично, а на деле… лучше бы их не использовали вовсе. 1. Метод «Бутерброда» 🥪 (Хорошо → Плохо → Хорошо) Приме

🔥20👍5🤗1🤩1

Signed Susanna Uraeva

25 Dec 2024, 09:29 UTC≈2,980 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю в какой момент я решила собрать фул-хаус из популярных онлайн-школ, но в мае мы обновили с академией Eduson лекции по маркетплейсам. Сегодня коллеги поздравили с Наступающим и обратной связью от студентов 🤩

🔥24🎉96👍5🤩2

Signed Susanna Uraeva

23 Dec 2024, 10:41 UTC≈2,450 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Врываемся в финальную неделю года с юмором!

😁18💯4🤣31

Signed Susanna Uraeva

22 Dec 2024, 14:40 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 8 August 2026

Вдруг вы тоже в поисках 🎄

Signed Susanna Uraeva

22 Dec 2024, 14:40 UTC≈2,210 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @burlak_na_mpPhoto

Самый важный вопрос на свете 📞 Где купить живую ёлку? Да такую, чтобы была высокая, пышная, зеленая и не стоила как айфон. Я смотрю на следующих площадках: 🔹Ozon: https://www.ozon.ru/category/zhivye-elki-35289/ 🔹Ягодки: https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/0/search.aspx?search=%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B5%20%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B8 🔹Яндекс Маркет: https://market.yandex.ru/catalog--novogodnie-zhivye-elki/19065823/ 🔹

👍5🔥4👌1

Signed Susanna Uraeva

20 Dec 2024, 11:27 UTC≈1,590 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎓На лекциях мы часто дискутируем со слушателями, достаточно ли эта карточка продающая. Ошибка начинающего селлера — примерять контент на себя, мол, нравится мне самому картинка и покупателям понравится. ‼️Запомните: Мы не наши клиенты! В работе опираемся не на свое видение прекрасного, а на своего клиента и на метрики. В каталоге обучения Озона нашла цикл коротких видео о продающих карточках товара. там есть и реко

🔥115👍3👏1💯1

Signed Susanna Uraeva

19 Dec 2024, 07:30 UTC≈1,500 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Москва! Вакансий подвезли к Новому Году!!! В нашей классной московской команде E-business Activation открыта вакансия Digital Content Specialist (да-да, смотря какой фэбрикс, смотря сколько дитэйлс 😹) Что нужно делать: 🎨 Разрабатывать коммерческий контент для продвижения бренда в онлайне 🎨 Экспериментировать с улучшением контента (мы за А/Б-тесты и принятие решений на основе данных) 🎨 Готовить отчеты и презентации

16🔥4👍3🤩1

Signed Susanna Uraeva

18 Dec 2024, 15:20 UTC≈1,340 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А что бы сказала твоя мама? 🤔 У Роберта Фитцпатрика есть чудесная книга «Спроси маму: Как общаться с клиентами и подтвердить правоту своей бизнес-идеи, если все кругом врут». Если интересуетесь темой изучения своего клиента, его потребностей, активно кастдевите, то очень рекомендую! Еще и читается быстро. В чем основные сложности проведения интервью с ЦА: 🪄люди хотят неосознанно выглядеть лучше, чем они есть на са

🔥15👏5😍3

Signed Susanna Uraeva

5 Dec 2024, 10:31 UTC≈2,440 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Завтра Ozon проводит большое мероприятие, посвященное Fashion — Ozon fashion fest Много работала с этим сегментом, погружалась в производственные процессы, модерировала International Commodity Fair, поэтому не могу позволить себе пропустить такое событие 💃 Ozon активно усиливают категорию Одежды, интересно наблюдать за развитием в контексте среднего чека. Главные цифры за 8–11 ноября: 💎 х2 к выручке и заказам в к

🔥94🤩2

Signed Susanna Uraeva

27 Nov 2024, 15:12 UTC≈2,590 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Видеообложки на Озоне все? Грустить будем?

👏6🤔5😱5😢1

Signed Susanna Uraeva

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @uraeva_online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сусанна Ураева | uraeva.online” (@uraeva_online), 689 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uraeva_online.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.