Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The betrayal knows my name ZINE

Channel

The betrayal knows my name ZINE

@urabokuzine

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003761157652
TypeChannel
Username@urabokuzine
Created13 April 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/urabokuzine

Growth

426 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:0242no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:5142first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
895.2%
avg views ÷ 42 subscribers
Avg views / post
376
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held11 (13 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total376
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3237.6%
🔥1315.3%
🥰1011.8%
custom 5397717956182446939910.6%
❤‍🔥910.6%
💋55.88%
💘44.71%
custom 539805115545030401433.53%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC376 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🤍 🤔 В нашем особняке Тасогаре в последнее время такой шум... Встречайте наших новых стражниц и стражей! … ~ Художницы/ки: 🌹 бордюра - тг 🤍Deadуля – тг 🌹 morinaga – тг 🤍Magnavarra – вк 🌹 личи – тг | вк 🤍Senku – тг 🌹 vissha – тг 🤍Yams – тг | вк 🌹 N,?iR – тг 🤍Hualin – тг 🌹 сушка – тг 🤍Дантист – тг | тикток 🌹 Lian – тикток 🤍lew – тг 🌹 min - тг Писательницы/ли: 🤍Vulpecula – фикбук 🌹 Lun – ао3 | вк

❤‍🔥5🔥2🥰2

21 Jun 2026, 07:25 UTC339 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Все приглашения были разосланы! В ближайшее время опубликуем список наших творцов♡

❤‍🔥43🥰2

16 May 2026, 17:50 UTC618 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩 Набор завершён! 🤩 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤩Всем огромное спасибо за участие🙂 В связи с тем, что заявок оказалось слишком мало (12), мы принимаем абсолютно всех.❤️ 🤩Ответы будут отправлены в течение двух дней. Также мы приняли решение, что ещё ненадолго откроем формы, так что если вы забыли подать заявку, можете сделать это в течение этих двух дней.

6💘4🔥1

15 May 2026, 08:04 UTC501 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Напоминаем, что сегодня последний день приёма заявок! Набор закроется 16 мая в 2 часа ночи по мск

🥰41

11 May 2026, 17:19 UTC517 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Мы боимся, что не сможем сделать страницы со всеми второстепенными персонаж(к)ами, поэтому будем очень рады, если вы напишете, кого хотите видеть в зине. Можно написать как в комментарии, так и в лс канала До конца набора осталось 4 дня!

💋5🥰21

22 Apr 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,290 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Будущие стражи Звельт, набор авторок и авторов является открытым до 19.05 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Анкета для художниц/ков Анкета для писательниц/ей Анкета для косплеерш/ов 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 В планах: -20-30 художниц и художников -5-8 писательниц и писателей -2-5 косплеерш и косплееров -Формат А5, мерч • Имейте ввиду, что информация может поменяться Желаем всем удачи!💜

custom 539771795618244693974custom 53980511554503040143🔥1

15 Apr 2026, 07:21 UTC665 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Набор участниц и участников начнётся 21 апреля💜 Вопрос по поводу формата зина и мерча ещё будем решать, но сейчас больше склоняемся к печатному формату, чем к электронному

🔥92

13 Apr 2026, 23:33 UTC≈7,740 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Проверка заинтересованности!

  1. Хочу участвовать как художник(ца)46%
  2. Хочу участвовать как писатель(ница)17%
  3. Хочу участвовать как косплеер(ша)8%
  4. Хотелось бы мерч28%
  5. Хотелось бы печатный зин (скорее всего предзакажу)45%

The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6custom 53977179561824469392

13 Apr 2026, 12:36 UTC≈7,670 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Проверка интереса к электронному зину по "The betrayal knows my name" 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍✝️🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Ваш отклик очень важен для нас и он решит дальнейшую судьбу зина В планах: 💜 Электронный формат 🤔 2-4 писателей/ниц 💚 15-25 художников/ниц • При бо́льшей заинтересованности, чем нами ожидается, возможна печать мерча, но, скорее всего, всё равно печатного зина не будет Все вопросы по поводу зина можно задать в личных сообщения

9

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @urabokuzine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Apr 2026, 23:33 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

Проверка заинтересованности!

  1. Хочу участвовать как художник(ца)46%
  2. Хочу участвовать как писатель(ница)17%
  3. Хочу участвовать как косплеер(ша)8%
  4. Хотелось бы мерч28%
  5. Хотелось бы печатный зин (скорее всего предзакажу)45%

The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 400,869 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The betrayal knows my name ZINE” (@urabokuzine), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urabokuzine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.