Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Музыкальный Маркетинг | UpSound

@upsound_org

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,342subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001347287491
TypeChannel
Username@upsound_org
DescriptionСтудия музыкального маркетинга Бориса Суворова. Продвигаем артистов в интернете. По поводу услуг писать: @upsound_music Наш сайт: we.upsound.org
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/upsound_org

Growth

11,33311,34411,338.57 August 2026 — 11,342 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,342 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,344 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,341 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,333 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,338 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,342 subscribers11,3427 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,331–11,346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:2311,342+4
11 Aug 2026, 18:5711,338+5
10 Aug 2026, 18:1311,333-8
9 Aug 2026, 21:3111,341-3
9 Aug 2026, 00:5411,344+2
7 Aug 2026, 10:0011,342no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:5611,342first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 11,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.706%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (10 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total33,163
Reactions total224
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
792
Videos
127
Links
551

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 35s
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

245 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11145.3%
👍3815.5%
❤‍🔥3012.2%
🔥228.98%
👏135.31%
😁114.49%
52.04%
🤝52.04%
😎41.63%
🎉20.816%
😍20.816%
🥰20.816%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC793 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Появился фильтр нейротреков для Яндекс Музыки Энтузиаст с Хабра проверил 3,8 млн треков и сделал расширение, которое помечает нейротреки и позволяет их пропускать в «Моей волне» Яндекс Музыки. Разбираем цифры, закон 243-ФЗ и то, как всё это влияет на продвижение живых артистов. В статье разберем: 📌 Что именно посчитал разработчик и можно ли верить этим цифрам 📌 Как математика отличает нейротрек от живого 📌 Позицию

👍62❤‍🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,030 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Как музыканты России борются с ИИ и новым законом Нейросети забирают у живых музыкантов деньги, чарты и контракты с лейблами — а к 2028 году, по прогнозам CISAC (международной организации по защите прав авторов), рынок ИИ-музыки вырастет почти в 20 раз. Что всё это значит для артистов и как остаться в игре, когда хиты всё чаще пишет машина? В выпуске разбираем: 📌 Скандал вокруг хита «Шадэ» 📌 Травлю за критику ИИ 📌

5👍3🤝1

6 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,460 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Куда исчезают деньги за прослушивания: Разбираем принцип выплат стримингов Стриминги не платят вам за то, что слушали именно вас. Они складывают все деньги от подписок и рекламы в один общий котёл и делят его между всеми артистами пропорционально доле в общем потоке прослушиваний. Поэтому сто тысяч стримов превращаются в три тысячи рублей, а миллион прослушиваний на стриминге приносит артисту примерно 30–40 тысяч р

4👍2😍21

6 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,370 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Вас просили выступить, записать фит или дать инструментал бесплатно — «за опыт и охваты»? Ваша реакция?

  1. Да, согласился и не пожалел31%
  2. Да, согласился и пожалел11%
  3. Да, отказался11%
  4. Не сталкивался46%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🥰2😁2🤝1

6 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,280 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Кажется, почти каждый музыкант хотя бы раз получал предложение выступить, записать фит или отдать бит бесплатно. Аргументы обычно одни и те же: «это же опыт», «будут охваты», «потом обязательно будут деньги». Но сработала ли эта схема хоть у кого-то? Или бесплатная работа так и осталась бесплатной? Интересно узнать ваш опыт 👇

4 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,580 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Нейросеть Higgsfield для контента артисту: гайд по использованию Визуал нужен каждому артисту: обложки, тизеры, промо для соцсетей. Но на съемки уходит много времени и денег, особенно если вы хотите стильный контент от профессиональной команды. Чтобы немного сэкономить, часть задач можно отдать нейросетям — они помогают собрать визуал без полноценных съёмок. Мы в UpSound всегда тестируем новинки. И не обошли сторон

❤‍🔥6👍32👏1

3 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

В вашей команде помогают за деньги или за респект?

  1. За деньги. Плачу друзьям как всем остальным31%
  2. Плачу, но по дружеской цене31%
  3. Не плачу — они в проекте по любви22%
  4. Плачу «как появятся деньги». Пока не появились12%
  5. Из-за денег с друзьями уже разошлись4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,360 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

В музыкальной индустрии проекты часто начинаются «на энтузиазме» Кто-то снимает клипы, кто-то ведет соцсети, делает обложки, красит артистов или играет на записи — потому что друзья, потому что верят в идею. Но где проходит граница между взаимопомощью и бесплатной работой? И должен ли друг получать деньги за свой труд? Поделитесь, как это устроено у вас 👇

11😁1

31 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC≈1,790 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

11👏4👍3

29 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,850 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Почему стриминг платит артистам копейки Вы выпустили трек, набрали сто тысяч прослушиваний, а ваша выплата — всего три тысячи рублей. Как так вышло? Стриминги платят не за то, что слушают именно вас: все деньги от подписок сваливаются в один общий котёл и делятся между всеми артистами пропорционально доле в прослушиваниях. В этой системе 1% артистов забирает 90% всех денег, а остальные полтора миллиона делят крохи.

7👍54👏2

28 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,660 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Маркировка AI-треков на стримингах: что нужно знать музыканту С 15 июля 2026 года Tidal вводит самые жёсткие правила для ИИ-музыки среди всех стримингов: полностью сгенерированные треки получат маркировку «ИИ», лишатся выплат, а слушатели смогут одним фильтром убрать их из своих рекомендаций. Пока одни площадки только рассуждают о маркировке, другие уже экспериментируют с ИИ-детекторами. Примем не все попытки удачн

17👍1🤝1

28 Jul 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,520 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💣 Грек с треком «Будда» занял 83 место в чарте VK Музыки! Это отличный результат и ещё одно подтверждение того, что мы движемся в правильном направлении. За каждым таким достижением стоит большая работа всей команды, и особенно приятно видеть её отражение в чартах 🔥 Поздравляем Грека с этим событием! Спасибо за доверие и совместную работу — впереди ещё больше крутых результатов ✊🏻

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @upsound_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTCAnonymous Poll194 voters

Вас просили выступить, записать фит или дать инструментал бесплатно — «за опыт и охваты»? Ваша реакция?

  1. Да, согласился и не пожалел31%
  2. Да, согласился и пожалел11%
  3. Да, отказался11%
  4. Не сталкивался46%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTCAnonymous Poll182 voters

В вашей команде помогают за деньги или за респект?

  1. За деньги. Плачу друзьям как всем остальным31%
  2. Плачу, но по дружеской цене31%
  3. Не плачу — они в проекте по любви22%
  4. Плачу «как появятся деньги». Пока не появились12%
  5. Из-за денег с друзьями уже разошлись4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 524,792 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Музыкальный Маркетинг | UpSound” (@upsound_org), 11,342 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upsound_org.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.