Channel
@uplexlaw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003768985768 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uplexlaw |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uplexlaw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 42 | +14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 28 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 28 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (22 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,528 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
82 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 37.8% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 25.6% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 15.9% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 8.54% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 6.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вашу работу используют без разрешения. Что делать? Фотографии, иллюстрации, дизайн, тексты и другой контент охраняются авторским правом. 😎 Пара важных тезисов от команды UP LEX: 1. Если работа опубликована в интернете, не означает, что ее можно бесплатно брать и использовать. Свободно использовать чужое произведение без согласия автора можно только в прямо предусмотренных законом случаях. Например, цитировать уж…
❤3🤔2👍1
Вы знали, что на шрифты тоже могут быть права и их реально защищают? 😎
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
За ваш сайт можно получить штраф - и вы об этом даже не знаете! Сайт часто делают по остаточному принципу: дизайнер собрал красивую страницу, маркетолог добавил формы, соцсети и аналитику. Вроде все готово. Однако юридически сайт может быть совсем не готов. 😎 Что рекомендуем проверить в первую очередь: — политику обработки персональных данных — согласия на обработку данных в формах — cookie и сервисы аналитики — …
❤2👍1
Эти ошибки могут стоить вашему бизнесу сотни тысяч рублей Мы собрали самые распространенные ошибки, из-за которых бизнес регулярно теряет деньги. Большинство предпринимателей узнают о них только после получения претензии или иска. Что это за ошибки? 🤔«Нашел фото в интернете - значит, можно использовать» Нельзя! Даже одна фотография может стать причиной судебного спора и требования о выплате компенсации. Кстати, с…
❤4👍1👏1🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤2👍2
Posted without readable text
Товар пострадал из-за атаки на склад. Значит ли это, что компенсации не будет? В последнее время все чаще появляются новости об атаках на склады и логистическую инфраструктуру. Вместе с этим многие селлеры задают один и тот же вопрос: 🙏«Если мой товар уничтожен или утрачен, могу ли я рассчитывать на компенсацию?» Сейчас маркетплейсы активно обновляют свои оферты и относят последствия атак БПЛА к обстоятельствам не…
👏3🔥2👍1🤔1
Posted without readable text
👍3❤1🔥1😱1
Представьте, что вы запускаете такие товары в продажу. 😎 Есть ли здесь юридические риски?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
С 1 сентября у бизнеса появится новый обязательный почтовый ящик У юридических лиц и ИП к 1 сентября должны появиться цифровые почтовые ящики, через которые можно будет получать официальные сообщения от государственных органов и Банка России. Такой ящик создается государством на базе «Госуслуг». В дальнейшем Правительство сможет определить случаи, когда получение таких сообщений через этот канал станет обязательны…
👍3😱2❤1
«Цена на маркетплейсе ≠ размер компенсации» или сколько стоит утраченный товар для суда? После недавних событий многие продавцы задают один и тот же вопрос: «Если мой товар уничтожен, сколько я смогу взыскать через суд?» 😎 Есть достаточно распространенное мнение №1: Суд просто возьмет цену товара, например, на Wildberries, и обяжет маркетплейс выплатить именно эту сумму, однако на практике все гораздо сложнее. О…
❤4👍2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @uplexlaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы знали, что на шрифты тоже могут быть права и их реально защищают? 😎
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Представьте, что вы запускаете такие товары в продажу. 😎 Есть ли здесь юридические риски?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 137,898 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UP LEX” (@uplexlaw), 42 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uplexlaw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.