Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Unnamed TM

@unntm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

951subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002236155441
TypeChannel
Username@unntm
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/unntm

Growth

944951947.56 August 2026 — 944 subscribers6 August 2026 — 944 subscribers7 August 2026 — 945 subscribers13 August 2026 — 951 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 943–952 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:27951+6
7 Aug 2026, 02:18945+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:50944no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:24944first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.2%
avg views ÷ 951 subscribers
Avg views / post
296
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held8 (3 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,778
Reactions total133
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

203 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53935665524632726837637.4%
custom 53935583662556107925225.6%
custom 53934228042028399164723.2%
custom 53935760099812585452110.3%
custom 539310731308514704552.46%
custom 539111836097500847520.985%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 8 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @unntm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC114 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @match_agency

Posted without readable text

custom 53935665524632726835custom 53934228042028399164custom 53931073130851470453

5 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC227 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

как строить медиабаинговую команду, когда рынок нестабилен? уже сегодня в 18:00 наша CBDO Полина станет одним из спикеров Voice Chat от INSIDE поговорим о том, как сегодня строить и масштабировать медиабаинговую команду, какие процессы действительно работают, как переживать кризисы и почему сильные команды продолжают расти даже в условиях нестабильного рынка when? 🤩5 августа, 18:00 (мск) where? 🤩telegram-канал IN

custom 53935665524632726839custom 53935583662556107928custom 53934228042028399165

3 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC263 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

FLOW by BROCONF. Pool Edition уже совсем скоро 🌊 20 августа affiliate-комьюнити снова соберется вне рабочих чатов — на FLOW by BROCONF. Pool Edition от MyBrocard это отличный повод встретиться с партнерами, познакомиться с новыми людьми из индустрии и совместить нетворкинг с летней атмосферой 🤩где: спортивный парк «Волен», Яхрома 🤩когда: 20 августа что ждет гостей: → Pool Party и пенная вечеринка → DJ-сеты в тече

custom 53935665524632726839custom 53935583662556107927custom 53934228042028399166

31 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC270 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @inside_affiliatePhoto

🎙 Как строить медиабаинговую команду, когда рынок нестабилен? Рынок постоянно меняется: связки живут меньше, конкуренция растет, а ошибки становятся дороже. Но сильные команды продолжают расти. Как? Обсудим это 5 августа в 18:00 на нашем Voice Chat вместе с представителями медиабаинговых команд. ⭐️Спикеры: • Полина — CBDO Unnamed Team • Матвей — Head of Buying F404 • Филипп — Head of Buying Mercurio Group • Мила —

custom 539355836625561079210custom 53934228042028399167custom 53935665524632726837custom 53931073130851470451

24 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC443 views24 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

we are hiring unnamed team растёт не на словах, а на объёмах 🤩 расширяем команду и ищем тех, кто готов расти вместе с нами открытые позиции в FB отдел: 🤩Middle / Senior Media Buyers — Tier 2 & Tier 3 🤩Senior Media Buyer — Tier 1 🤩Team Lead мы предлагаем: 🤩безлимитные бюджеты 🤩эксклюзивные оффера 🤩наставничество от опытных специалистов 🤩прозрачную систему роста 🤩гибкий подход к KPI и бонусам пиши нашему HR — обсуд

custom 53935665524632726839custom 53934228042028399166custom 53935583662556107924custom 53911183609750084752custom 53935760099812585452custom 53931073130851470451

17 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC461 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

может ли баер влиять на повторный депозит? сегодня важно не только привести игрока, но и понимать, какой потенциал есть у этого трафика на дистанции баер не управляет RD напрямую, но именно он влияет на качество аудитории через гео, креативы и подходы в карусели разбираем, почему дешёвый FTD не всегда = качественный трафик и какие факторы влияют на повторный депозит 🤩 сильный баинг — это не только про объём. это

custom 539356655246327268312custom 53935760099812585459custom 53935583662556107927

11 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC434 views34 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @inside_affiliateVideo

ACCESS REQUEST DETECTED… Система INSIDE Vault активирована 🔐 В честь предстоящего дня рождения INSIDE мы подготовили подарки и надежно спрятали их в сейфе… Но в целях безопасности код доступа был зашифрован. ✔️ Теперь твоя миссия — восстановить его. В течение 10 дней тебе предстоит выполнять задания, находить подсказки и собирать части кодовой фразы. ➡️ Только собрав всю комбинацию, ты сможешь открыть сейф INSIDE

custom 539356655246327268314custom 539342280420283991610custom 539357600998125854510

3 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC470 views36 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

GGC DONE 🤩конференции из раза в раз напоминают, насколько ценно живое общение и обмен опытом! спасибо организаторам, партнерам и каждому, с кем удалось познакомиться, пообщаться и провести время🤩 see u soon

custom 539355836625561079216custom 539356655246327268311custom 53934228042028399169

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @unntm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 614,881 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Unnamed TM” (@unntm), 951 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unntm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.