转发一些
Channel
不可名状的偏差
@unknowndeviation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001467422678 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unknowndeviation |
| Description | 这里有时效性过短的杂碎知识,以及一些这个人刚知道的常识,甚至包括日常吐槽、开示内心想法、或者钦点,可能没有任何意义 不仅因为这里记载了一部分这个人的踩坑经历,关键因为这里记载了一部分这个人的踩坑经历,主要因为这里记载了一部分这个人的踩坑经历 事实:这个人技术确实很菜(菜见到了菜的妈 推(qin)荐(dian): t.me/unknowndeviation/949 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unknowndeviation |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 46 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 46 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.3%
- avg views ÷ 46 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4.8
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (24 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 76 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,770
- Videos
- ≈468
- Links
- ≈1,850
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 35m 23s
- Average length
- 11m 48s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://music.163.com/playlist?id=2447344909 在想「怀念感放辣椒」到底是哪来的时候,发现了这个项目
#想法 最近在想如何建立一些不同的基准点,以此来判断自己的位置 过去:吃苦耐劳才能成功 现在:选择大于努力 这里面的例子其实都是用过时的/不恰当的基准来判断新鲜的东西 如何判断自己建立的基准点是「正确的」是个难题,以及不同的场景下还适用于不同的判断标准 完全搞懂之后的状态应该是见人说人话,见鬼说鬼话
https://telegra.ph/两个人关系很好如何区分这是友情还是爱情-08-03
各种猫科动物的叫声——猎豹:喵(小小声) 转自新浪微博-我和宠物的日常 地址:https://weibo.com/2855071827/HrfcL0nn9?filter=hot&root_comment_id=0&type=comment 甚至有喵开始卡痰...... @蛋黄星人: 发布视频 播放量:427.88万 弹幕:2.60万 评论:3271 点赞:11.88万 投币:5064 收藏:6.59万 转发:1.87万 发布日期:2019-04-25 07:40:33
b23.tv/BV1r441187wy
https://github.com/hosxy/keep-kernel-modules-hook 只需要 pacman 的 arch 更新内核保留模块的钩子
为什么中国人现在喝不动了? | 原文
qq宠物停止运营的原因? A.没收入 B.没人玩 C.傻逼魔方搬家时把服务器摔坏了 via 匿名
https://fixupx.com/i/status/2082289569895207401
https://fixupx.com/jackzho7941435/status/2082353359391240677
- ▎Source from ACG Collection via Neru Mayoi
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @unknowndeviation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 985,254 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“不可名状的偏差” (@unknowndeviation), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unknowndeviation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.