Channel
@universalguidance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
792subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001163367124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @universalguidance |
| Created | 19 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/universalguidance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 792 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 794 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 794 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (8 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 297 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
271 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 220 | 81.2% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 10.7% | |
| 💯 | 19 | 7.01% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Actively practice believing, or rather knowing since it is a fact, that the more blessed and happy you are on any level, the more you contribute positive energy to the universe. Actively practice reminding yourself day by day, that your happiness is not a burden. Achieving your desires, is a blessing for all. It does not make anyone less blessed. And if it looks like it makes others miserable, know that they would'v…
❤10
Did you know that interference is actually allowed on Earth unlike what's being spread everywhere? ✨ Earth call for assistance ✨ I call upon real powerful unconditionally loving beings to interfere on Earth and help to: ◇ Cleanse & shield Earth from negative entities & negative agendas that force people to be enslaved to survive and thrive on Earth. ◇ Cleanse Earth from entities and thought forms that lead to cri…
❤15💯2
It is important to remind yourself to be kinder to the versions of you that feel bad, triggered, on a low vibration, incapable of raising their vibration, etc. You've been heavily programmed, even with violence in certain cases. You've been bombarded with lies about yourself. You've been traumatized by how little respect other humans can show you. The last thing you need, is to invalidate your feelings, and call yo…
❤21
Being triggered is often used as an insult recently. Being triggered doesn't make you weak. It doesn't make what they said true and doesn't make you low vibrational. It just means you unconsciously, meaning not of your own doing, agree on some level or entirely with their lies. It doesn't make the lies true. Use it as an opportunity to fix that alignment, & what makes you easily triggered such as lack of self-valid…
❤9🔥4
By letting yourself get carried away with other people's negative comments towards you or their negative actions, you are letting them win and reach their negative goal to bring you down. In order not to get there, don't join their perspective. If they believe their input was powerful and true, don't just join them on it. If you fight them, you are proving that you unconsciously ended up agreeing. If it triggers you…
❤13
As your vibration generally rises, which is the case for most who read this post, the gap between how you perceive yourself and how the world treats you can start to seem jarring. This can cause you to be highly triggered, higher than you used to be in the past. Why? Because your standards have changed, and certain levels of respect are no longer enough for you. It is important to remember, not to be defeated by th…
❤11👍2
There is a reason you have felt uncomfortable your entire life with having your behavior policed or criticized by others. It is not because they were right and you need to be corrected or checked. It is because you are not supposed to be policed in any kind of way. You are not and have never been responsible for other people's realities, outcomes, or feelings. It is because they have not managed to see your beauty …
❤13💯6
✨✨✨✨ @universalguidance
❤16👍1
The universe is not in a budget deficit. There are no government budget issues in many timelines, because people stopped believing these weird programs in their personal lives. Your well-being, & your loved ones well-being, do not take from anyone else's well-being, on any level. You can be as rich as you want, it will only raise the collective's vibration to be richer. Same goes for health, happiness, peace and a…
❤12💯6
Self-love is the biggest catalyst for higher vibrations. If you love yourself, you will automatically take the high vibrational decisions in literally every area of life. Just because everyone is talking about it including celebrities, it doesn't mean it should be dismissed and pushed to the side as a mainstream boring topic. Tap into the real meaning of it and apply it regardless of how much everyone discusses it…
❤17
People can only tap into conclusions that their vibrations allow them to get to. The higher the vibration, the closer to the (real and ultimate) truth. It doesn't matter how logic-smart the person is, how much they achieved in the past or how many Nobel prizes they won. This is why you shouldn't take people seriously when they put you down. Observe their attitude. If it's not positive or loving, then they are not t…
❤14
Logic and scientific proof are not the only and ultimate compass for the truth. After being heavily trained to recognize the truth using logic, physical & scientific proof, many people and especially those that are (ironically) considered the ultimate spokespeople for the truth are excluding the real answers from the truth. Never rely on logic and evidence to decide your worthiness on any level, no matter how smart…
🔥10❤4💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @universalguidance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 450,540 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💎 The Cat Guides 💎” (@universalguidance), 792 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/universalguidance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.