Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UNIRATE24

Channel

UNIRATE24

@unirate_24

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

263subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450964310
TypeChannel
Username@unirate_24
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/unirate_24

Growth

2612632628 August 2026 — 261 subscribers8 August 2026 — 261 subscribers16 August 2026 — 262 subscribers24 August 2026 — 263 subscribers8 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 261–263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 20:03263+1
16 Aug 2026, 21:33262+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:05261no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:02261first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26m 38s
Average length
13m 19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1648.5%
🔥1442.4%
26.06%
👎13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
10.0%
1 of 10 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
84.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
159
over 8 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJpps8EWC2yR8a7NLyjhziYcBZNpVvZ6SjTH8Pn123 July 202623 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 23 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC83 viewsread 8 August 2026

⬆️Мониторинг в Unirate24 полезен не только службе безопасности. Финансовые директора могут использовать его для контроля рисков по клиентам и контрагентам, своевременно выявлять ухудшение финансового состояния и снижать вероятность роста проблемной дебиторской задолженности.

23 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Advertisementerid CQH36pWzJpps8EWC2yR8a7NLyjhziYcBZNpVvZ6SjTH8PnForwarded from @cfo_russiaru

Новости партнеров #CFORussia Чек-лист CFO при работе с товарными отсрочками Доля убыточных предприятий в РФ достигла 28,8%, а объем официально просроченных платежей между компаниями уже перешагнул 8,2 трлн рублей. Перед предоставлением отсрочек поставщики проверяли контрагентов – смотрели финотчетность, арбитражи и ФССП. Но по итогу получили проблемную дебиторку. Что они не учли? Команда Unirate24 подготовили боль

👍3👎1

21 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Запускаем ежемесячный дайджест обновлений Unirate24 Теперь раз в месяц будем рассказывать о новых возможностях сервиса и изменениях, которые делают проверки удобнее, быстрее и информативнее. Что появилось в Unirate24 за последний месяц: ⚖️ Судебные решения теперь доступны в сервисе В продуктах «Комплексная проверка физического лица» и «Суды» появилась возможность получить и посмотреть текст судебного решения. Те

👍4

15 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC148 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔎 Как увидеть невозвратного дебитора до суда В продолжение темы, которую мы разбирали в материале для журнала «Директор по безопасности». Главная проблема не в том, что компании не проверяют контрагентов. Проблема в том, что риск часто становится виден слишком поздно: лимит уже согласован, отсрочка уже дана, товар или работы уже отгружены, а вернуть деньги становится сложно. В открытых источниках у контрагента ещ

🔥4👍21

8 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC159 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вышла статья в «Директоре по безопасности». Иллюзия безопасности: почему российский бизнес кредитует контрагентов, от которых отказались банки Вышла статья в журнале «Директор по безопасности» (№07-2026). О том, почему стандартные проверки контрагентов работают ограниченно и что с этим делать. Несколько тезисов из статьи: 📊 Цифры, которые нельзя игнорировать → Просроченная дебиторка между компаниями достигла 8,2 тр

🔥51👍1

29 Apr 2026, 03:58 UTC222 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Последняя «бонусная» часть с вебинара по «мониторингу рисков», как это сделать с помощью ИИ Агента. Разбираем как построить ИИ агента, какие задачи ему поставить, какие источники информации мониторить, и что делать, если выявлен риск. Уже сейчас мы готовим новый вебинар, где покажем как агент работает вживую, берет конкретную компанию, находит по ней риск и уведомляет СБ об уровне риска и его причинах. Полная запис

👍3

27 Apr 2026, 05:48 UTC189 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Как обстоят дела с управлением риском по контрагентам в вашей компании

  1. Проверяем по открытым источникам63%
  2. Проверяем долговую нагрузку25%
  3. Ставим на мониторинг по открытым источникам50%
  4. Ставим на мониторинг по долговой нагрузке25%
  5. У нас нет отсрочки платежа13%
  6. Не проверяем контрагентов0%

The shares total 176%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Apr 2026, 05:44 UTC180 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подъехала свежая статистика по рынку — и она уже системная, а не разовая аномалия. Просроченная дебиторская задолженность бизнеса превысила 8 трлн ₽. Для сравнения: просрочка по кредитованию бизнеса в банковской системе — около 2 трлн ₽. 👉 Разница — в 4 раза. И это только та часть, которая дошла до арбитража. ⸻ Что происходит на самом деле Рост просроченной дебиторки идёт быстрее, чем рост бизнеса. Это означае

👍3

15 Apr 2026, 11:21 UTC179 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Следующий блок — суть вебинара (16 минут) Здесь уже без теории — разбираем практику: 📌 Источник данных — БКИ • какое покрытие по ИП, ООО и физлицам • где данные действительно полезны, а где — нет 📌 Как читать кредитную историю • на что смотреть в первую очередь • какие сигналы реально говорят о риске 📌 Оценка риска • в статике (перед контрактом или наймом) • в динамике (когда отношения уже идут) 📌 Разбор н

🔥5

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @unirate_24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Apr 2026, 05:48 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Как обстоят дела с управлением риском по контрагентам в вашей компании

  1. Проверяем по открытым источникам63%
  2. Проверяем долговую нагрузку25%
  3. Ставим на мониторинг по открытым источникам50%
  4. Ставим на мониторинг по долговой нагрузке25%
  5. У нас нет отсрочки платежа13%
  6. Не проверяем контрагентов0%

The shares total 176%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UNIRATE24” (@unirate_24), 263 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unirate_24.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.