Friends-n-YYY pinned an audio file

Channel
Friends-n-YYY
@unique_yyy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003885307237 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unique_yyy |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 29 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unique_yyy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 7 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 166.1%
- avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11.6
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 11.8%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 93 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 18
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 109
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 70.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#Y26 #M08
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/T8OeuC1QC_JpTdDb6fW6Xw 反转了喵 如何看待普林小虎队刊登的关于菲尔兹奖直播的评论文章? - 唱唱反调的回答 - 知乎 https://www.zhihu.com/question/2065917465054418301/answer/2065929095549133814
https://worldswritingsystems.org/
👍2
Show HN: TikZ Editor – LaTeX 图形所见即所得编辑器 原文:https://tikz.dev/editor/ 阅读时间:4 分钟 分数:425 🔥
https://www.bilibili.com/opus/1229213047382343689 我反感菲尔兹奖成功后,一群人过来认领关系 - 宜城漫士的文章 - 知乎 https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/2064675518549693961 OK 两个链接都已经荒野了喵 😇😇
独立博客版的 Hacker News 原文:https://bubbles.town/ 阅读时间:2 分钟 分数:577 🔥
Photo, posted without a caption
😁1
2026 年菲尔兹奖揭晓,中国籍数学家首次获得菲尔兹奖 国际数学联盟公布 2026 年菲尔兹奖得主。菲尔兹奖每四年颁发一次,用于表彰未满 40 岁、已取得突出成果并展现未来潜力的数学家。 邓煜 表彰他在偏微分方程方面的贡献,包括从稀薄气体的硬球动力学严格推导出玻尔兹曼方程、从非线性色散系统推导出波动力学方程,以及在非线性薛定谔动力学方面的概率方法研究。 John Pardon 表彰他在辛几何方面的成就,包括虚拟基本循环的新方法、某些流形的福冈(Fukaya)范畴与全纯曲线的计数,以及他在几何与拓扑其他领域的贡献,包括三维流形上的群作用和纽结理论。 Jacob Tsimerman 表彰他在将"o-极小性"重新塑造为算术与复代数几何的基本方法方面的贡献,以及他在证明多个核心猜想中所扮演的角色,包括周期映射像的代数性(格里菲斯猜想)和西格尔模簇的安德烈- 奥尔特猜想。 王虹 表彰她在调和分析与几何测度论方面的贡献,包括将多尺…
👍1
Friends-n-YYY pinned «https://space.bilibili.com/35868098 安利 #selected»
https://space.bilibili.com/35868098 安利 #selected
❤2
牛逼 https://fish.audio/zh-CN/blog/s2-1-pro-free-api/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @unique_yyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Friends-n-YYY” (@unique_yyy), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unique_yyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.