А какой цвет выберешь ты?
- Nardo Grey13%
- Цветной Meta PPF87%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3

Channel
@union_ppf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
275subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003201368405 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @union_ppf |
| Description | PPF UNION | АНТИГРАВИЙНАЯ ПЛЕНКА 18 лет системной работы с PPF Более 200 студий-партнеров Работаем через партнёрскую сеть по всему миру Вся информация — https://ppfunion.com/ |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/union_ppf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 275 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 275 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 277 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (4 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,167 |
| Reactions total | 83 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
138 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 39.9% | |
| custom 5370587884724193114 | 49 | 35.5% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 24.6% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А какой цвет выберешь ты?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Наши контакты: ⭐️ ppfunion.com 🟥 UNION Пишите или звоните: partners, support
❤6🔥4custom 53705878847241931143
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5🔥2custom 53705878847241931142
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5custom 53705878847241931144🔥2
Вокруг PPF-плёнки до сих пор много мифов 🚘 Разберём три самых популярных. Первый — плёнка желтеет. Желтеет только материал низкого качества. Современные полиуретановые плёнки сохраняют прозрачность годами и имеют гарантию от производителя ✨ Второй — под плёнкой портится краска. Наоборот. PPF защищает заводское лакокрасочное покрытие от сколов, реагентов и внешнего воздействия 🛡️ Третий — плёнку невозможно снять б…
custom 53705878847241931144❤2🔥1
«Оклейка — это дорого» — говорят обычно до первого скола на капоте 🚘 А потом начинается другая математика: перекраска деталей, потеря заводского окраса и минус к стоимости автомобиля при продаже 💸 PPF работает иначе: она принимает на себя камни, песок, реагенты и следы эксплуатации, сохраняя родную краску под собой 🛡️ Да, оклейка требует вложений на старте. Но в долгую она помогает сохранить не только внешний вид …
🔥3custom 53705878847241931143❤2
Участницы WOMEN’S WRAP BATTLE. Часть 2 🖤 В этом видео — девушки, которые вышли на площадку, чтобы показать свой уровень, справиться с волнением и пройти конкурсные этапы перед судьями и всей индустрией. У каждой — свой путь, свой опыт и своя причина быть здесь. Но всех объединило одно: любовь к оклейке, желание расти и смелость заявить о себе 🔥 WOMEN’S WRAP BATTLE by PPF Union стал местом, где участницы не просто …
custom 53705878847241931145🔥4❤3
Не каждый автомобиль нужно оклеивать PPF-плёнкой. И да, мы говорим об этом открыто. Если кузов уже требует ремонта — сначала нужно решить эту проблему, а уже потом думать о защите. Если автомобиль почти не эксплуатируется, а годовой пробег минимальный — оклейка может просто не иметь смысла. И если вы планируете продать машину в ближайший год, вложения в защиту не всегда оправданы. Мы за честный подход, а не за п…
custom 53705878847241931144❤2🔥1
Mercedes-Benz в сатиновой плёнке PPF UNION. Сатиновый полиуретан — это вариант для тех, кто хочет не только защитить кузов, но и изменить визуальное восприятие автомобиля. Он даёт мягкий приглушённый эффект: не глянец и не полный мат, а спокойная премиальная поверхность, которая подчёркивает линии кузова и делает цвет глубже. При этом плёнка сохраняет все защитные свойства PPF: берёт на себя мелкие царапины, песок…
🔥3custom 53705878847241931143❤2
Судьи WOMEN’S WRAP BATTLE. Часть 2 🖤 В этом видео — Инна Дудкина и Георгий w60bro, люди, которые оценивали не просто финальный вид работы, а каждую деталь: технику, чистоту установки, углы, кромки, рез и уверенность участниц в процессе. Именно такие комментарии показывают, насколько в PPF важны мелочи — потому что в оклейке нет случайных деталей. WOMEN’S WRAP BATTLE by PPF Union стал площадкой, где девушки смогли …
❤2custom 53705878847241931142🔥1
Сегодня гарантию на PPF дают многие. Но важен не сам срок. Важно, что за ним стоит. Мы уверены в своих материалах, поэтому предоставляем гарантию от 5 лет до пожизненной — в зависимости от серии плёнки. Она распространяется на такие случаи, как пожелтение, растрескивание и отслоение материала. За этим стоят не просто обещания, а 18 лет опыта, тестирования и работы с профессиональными студиями. Для нас гарантия —…
❤5🔥2custom 53705878847241931142
Голос участниц WOMEN’S WRAP BATTLE 🖤 На площадке мы поговорили с девушками, которые приехали показать свой уровень, пройти конкурсные этапы и стать частью первого чемпионата по оклейке автомобилей среди девушек. В этом интервью — эмоции, волнение, честные впечатления и та самая энергия, ради которой мы всё это создавали. WOMEN’S WRAP BATTLE by PPF Union — это не только про соревнование. Это про смелость выйти на п…
🔥3custom 53705878847241931142❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @union_ppf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А какой цвет выберешь ты?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 604,281 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PPF UNION” (@union_ppf), 275 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/union_ppf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.