Channel
@unicrypt_uncx_announcements
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
364subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001236970525 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unicrypt_uncx_announcements |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unicrypt_uncx_announcements |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 364 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 365 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 365 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 March 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
22 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 86.4% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 13.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Pleased to announce a couple of things: 1. We're partnering with Quiver, scope being the integration of lockers and overall advisory / product adoption 2. We've audited their LP lockers contracts with no findings and overall top-tier gas efficiency. Good job there. 3. We're going to help and support them design these hooks on top of Uniswap v4 as we're familiar with custom hooks / subsequent LP locking compatibili…
🔥2
Last week we launched V3 lockers on Robinhood Chain. Today we launch V4 lockers and token vesting. Secure a V4 position, vest tokens on a schedule, and let anyone verify the commitments on-chain. UNCX builds the trustless infrastructure that powers DeFi 🛠
❤3
New on UNCX Academy 📚 Locking a Uniswap V3 position on Robinhood chain isn't the end of the story. You can extend the unlock date, claim the fees it earns, or hand it to a multisig. The one thing you can't do is exit early. The Lifecycle of a Robinhood V3 Lock: https://academy.uncx.network/articles/the-lifecycle-of-a-robinhood-v3-lock
UNCX Lockers are now integrated with Robinhood Chain via Uniswap. New chain, new projects, but no track record. Locked liquidity is how a team demonstrates commitment before trading history exists. And with a V3 position, locked doesn't mean idle 🔒
❤1
UNCX Lockers are live today on Robinhood Chain via Uniswap. Lock a V3 position, choose when it expires, and collect trading fees without unlocking. All on-chain and publicly verifiable. Built on the same trusted contracts that have secured liquidity for 70,000+ projects 🔒
❤3
Do you want to know if a project is serious about its long-term goals? Check the lock 🔒 On Solana, LP locks are public and verifiable. Teams that lock show commitment in a way the market can actually see — not just claim. DYOR: Here's how Solana lockers work: https://docs.uncx.network/guides/for-projects/solana-lockers
❤2
DeFi needs standards. UNCX delivers them: 🔐 Locked liquidity 📊 Transparent vesting 🌾 Staking and Farming 🚀 Fair launches 🌐 Multi-chain minting 🪙 Token Dispersion Trusted infrastructure for projects that want to build — not extract.
❤1
Vesting is easier to trust when the schedule can be checked directly. If communities can see the unlock logic, dates, and structure for themselves, expectations become clearer. How to verify token vesting ⬇️ https://docs.uncx.network/guides/for-investors/token-vesting/how-can-i-check-if-the-project-locked-tokens
❤1
Different token allocations often need different vesting schedules 🗓 Team allocations, treasury holdings, community rewards, and advisor allocations each serve different purposes, so the release structure should reflect that. A single schedule is not always the best fit. A strong project plan starts with clear token allocation and a release schedule designed around each allocation’s role.
❤1
How tokens unlock over time has an impact on how supply is understood by the market. Different release schedules suit different allocations and objectives, including: ▫️ cliff releases ▫️ linear vesting ▫️ custom intervals The right schedule depends on what the allocation is designed to support. 📚 Read more about token vesting best practices here: https://academy.uncx.network/articles/token-vesting-best-practices
❤1
Minting is only one part of launch preparation. Before a token goes live, teams still need to think about supply, liquidity, chain selection, and how that structure will be understood by the market. At UNCX, we provide advanced tooling for token creation, vesting, liquidity locking, and distribution. Use UNCX tools to strengthen your launch structure and demonstrate a clear commitment to community-focused projects…
❤1
Token unlocks are not just dates on a schedule. They affect circulating supply, market expectations, and how clearly a project’s allocation structure can be understood. They also shape how communities interpret future distribution, which is why vesting design needs to be clear and well communicated. Every unlock matters. 🔒
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @unicrypt_uncx_announcements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 627,432 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UNCX Network Announcements” (@unicrypt_uncx_announcements), 364 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unicrypt_uncx_announcements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.