Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Oh

Channel

Oh

@unicrwn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

-418 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003356318868
TypeChannel
Username@unicrwn
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/unicrwn

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34392217 August 2026 — 421 subscribers8 August 2026 — 421 subscribers14 August 2026 — 429 subscribers21 August 2026 — 424 subscribers28 August 2026 — 423 subscribers5 September 2026 — 420 subscribers13 September 2026 — 439 subscribers28 September 2026 — 3 subscribers7 August 202628 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 51 days, net -418. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 03:223-436
13 Sept 2026, 16:40439+19
5 Sept 2026, 12:20420-3
28 Aug 2026, 17:34423-1
21 Aug 2026, 12:08424-5
14 Aug 2026, 19:07429+8
8 Aug 2026, 05:31421no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:00421first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54745116579023106902226.2%
custom 49539775559557466141720.2%
custom 52624572812739626961720.2%
custom 49562721937732429361416.7%
custom 50462886695733846241416.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @unicrwn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 00:43 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed kindergarten gf

8 Aug 2026, 00:43 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

stop gettinf ur accs deleted. Also stop crying about ur “csam” getting leaked but u sent it in da first place?? obvi its sad to have ur naked body go around but thats the consequences ob sending nudes and u should know dat…

custom 49562721937732429364custom 49539775559557466142

Signed kindergarten gf

7 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC62 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54745116579023106903custom 50462886695733846242custom 49539775559557466141

Signed kindergarten gf

6 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC77 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

iHate wen the person who chose someone over me asks wjy dey blocked like hallo😭😭😭

custom 54745116579023106903custom 49539775559557466142

Signed kindergarten gf

4 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC115 views20 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

react or leave channel

custom 526245728127396269610custom 49539775559557466145custom 49562721937732429365

Signed kindergarten gf

4 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC125 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

wait chill onMw daddi pciked da earrings iWann get my second hole done 😊😊😊

custom 547451165790231069014custom 49539775559557466142custom 50462886695733846242

Signed kindergarten gf

3 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC135 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

shoulf ι makw priv channel fwr personal

  1. yesssshhhh 🚬🚬🌟🌟53%
  2. nuuuuu 🌟🍭🐰47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed kindergarten gf

3 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC144 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 49539775559557466143custom 50462886695733846241

Signed kindergarten gf

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @unicrwn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

shoulf ι makw priv channel fwr personal

  1. yesssshhhh 🚬🚬🌟🌟53%
  2. nuuuuu 🌟🍭🐰47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Oh” (@unicrwn), 3 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unicrwn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.